Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eliminate the TSA
Townhall.com ^ | October 22, 2012 | Katie Kieffer

Posted on 10/22/2012 4:26:48 AM PDT by Kaslin

I’m reading the Constitution and I do not see a “Grope or Scan” clause. The TSA is unconstitutional. Let’s eliminate the TSA.

If you read my columns regularly, you know that I consider the TSA to be a carcinogenic petting zoo. I nearly always opt out. I object to the scanners on principle of their unconstitutionality. And I am concerned about the possibility of a scanner malfunction (thousands of service calls have been made to the backscatter X-ray machines)—which medical experts warn can result in extremely high radiation exposure.

Last week, I was traveling to New Jersey to speak at Americans for Prosperity’s Defending the American Dream Summit. I nearly missed my flight. And it was not because I overslept.

I arrived early to the Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport and already had my boarding pass. I’m thinking, “I’m golden. I have some extra time to grab breakfast and then relax before my flight.” No such luck.

After placing my luggage on the conveyer belt, I informed the TSA agent (a female) that I would be opting out. She said: “OK, well, you’re going to have to wait a while. Step over there and wait.”

I waited approximately 10 minutes and she never called for an agent. I reminded her that I needed to opt out. Her supervisor came over to her and said: “We are short on female staffers. I need you to do the pat-down and I’ll have another agent take your place up here.” She responded: “No. I don’t want to. I want to stay up here. Can’t you get another female agent to do it?”

He did not reprimand her for refusing to do her job. (This is not the private sector.) Instead, he made me wait until a different female staffer became available, further delaying me.

After my pat-down, the agent’s gloves set off the alarm. So, she did a second, more invasive pat-down in a back room. Her gloves still set off the alarm, so she said they needed to take apart my luggage and individually re-send everything through the X-ray machine.

Two TSA agents and four supervisors (it takes a village) unfolded all my clothes and even tore through my undergarments. They slowly sent small piles of my things through the X-ray machine, using about 15 bins, even though I only had a carry-on suitcase, a purse and a laptop. This process took about 45 minutes and I kept looking up at the clock, thinking: “I’m going to miss my flight!” I asked a TSA agent: “So what happens if I miss my flight?” He said, “You’ll have to work that out with your airline.”

I asked a TSA supervisor to call my airline and let them know I was on my way and see if they could hold the plane a few minutes for me. He said, “They are a separate company and we don’t know their phone number and cannot call them.” I said: “So you’re in the same building and you don’t know their number? And you can’t find their number on Google?” His eyes bulged, like a child caught lying.

I literally had only five minutes to catch my flight when the TSA agents finished scanning my luggage. I threw everything into my suitcase, wrinkling my suit. Then I tossed my laptop and cell phone cables into my purse and started running full speed for my gate.

Clothes were peaking out of my half-zipped suitcase and cables were flying out of my purse. Everyone was staring at me. I don’t blame them; I’m sure I looked like a riot.

The only reason I made my flight was because I spotted a courtesy transport (they look like golf carts) and begged the driver for a lift to my gate. He saved my day.

I now know that “opting out” is only an “option” if you arrive insanely early to the airport or you enjoy tossing cash into the gutter.

If you are a businessperson rushing to make a meeting; a bride and groom heading to a destination ceremony; a parent with unruly young children or a caretaker traveling with an Alzheimer's patient, you cannot endure the hassle and delay of opting out.

And the TSA apparently does not take responsibility for re-booking flights missed due to its security delays. So, opting out could mean paying $500-plus out-of-pocket to rebook if the TSA delays you.

My story is just one among many. I’m sharing my experience in hopes that doing so encourages more Americans to publicly voice their own incidents. The squeaky wheel gets the grease; we all need to express our outrage at the unconstitutional and unhealthy treatment we endure from the TSA.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: airlines; americans4prosperity; invasivepatdowns; kochbrothers; tsa; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Kaslin
{this lamppost reserved for Michael Chertoff}


41 posted on 10/22/2012 6:45:53 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Look at the little demonstration flyer taped to the wall in this picture...

..It looks like it was put up there by a six year old. Details matter, and to me, the sloppiness and slap dash matter that flyer was put up with, knowing that it was there for the traveling public at large, says a lot about the attitudes the TSA has for those passengers.

42 posted on 10/22/2012 6:51:17 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
Honey, I shrunk the IRS!
43 posted on 10/22/2012 7:13:28 AM PDT by carumba (The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made. Groucho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
What you have noticed is just another example of the complete lack of professionalism and respect for customers that DEFINES the TSA. Privatization is the only way to change that. Put someone’s reputation on the line and the quality will climb.
44 posted on 10/22/2012 7:18:41 AM PDT by Casie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels

Do away with the TSA and let the airlines pay for their own security. The customer flying should be the one to bear the cost burden for that security and should expect a quality product.
I will not fly because the airlines depend on the useless TSA and are glad to let the taxpayer pay for their business to operate. The market is perverted, and the product sucks.


45 posted on 10/22/2012 7:23:06 AM PDT by ExpatGator (I hate Illinois Nazis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels

Easiest would be to re-assert/re-allow the 2nd Amendment; but you must load with frangible ammo.

Problem solved.

I recently returned from an out of town, work required, conference where the TSA dip-shit was INDIVIDUALLY going through a tin of change. I bet there was 1/2 the gate sitting there, watching the stupid radiate from the checkpoint.


46 posted on 10/22/2012 7:49:03 AM PDT by i_robot73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
TSA = NAZIS w/union

end of

47 posted on 10/22/2012 8:00:02 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels
So what's your solution?

They've already reinforced the cockpit doors. Arm the flight crew, (and/or the passengers) and we could all get back on with our lives sans TSA.

48 posted on 10/22/2012 8:07:49 AM PDT by zeugma (Rid the world of those savages. - Dorothy Woods, widow of a Navy Seal, AMEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

[ I agree - it’s kabuki theater security ]

Maybe we should go through security dressed up as Kabuki actors?

Maybe then we could demostarte how dumb this kabuki thing is...


49 posted on 10/22/2012 8:13:38 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
But we cannot have anyone screaming Profiling!.

Who would you have do the profiling if not the same TSA drones you're currently complaining about.

50 posted on 10/22/2012 8:25:23 AM PDT by Delhi Rebels (There was a row in Silver Street - the regiments was out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ExpatGator
Do away with the TSA and let the airlines pay for their own security.

TWA can't keep their seats bolted to the floor and I'm supposed to trust them with security?

51 posted on 10/22/2012 8:29:02 AM PDT by Delhi Rebels (There was a row in Silver Street - the regiments was out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Casie
So, what is the solution? Private Companies. Why? Because the Gestapo like attitudes would not be tolerated. Employees would be better screened and trained. Standard Operating Procedures would need to serve an actual purpose or service. Like any private company, they would strive for excellence in their field and they would want to build customer trust.

That's probably the first reasonable suggestion I've seen yet. But how do we ensure that the private companies don't degenerate to a rent-a-cop level of service that's even worse than the TSA? You know that if it gets turned over to the airlines to fund and supervise then it'll go to the lowest cost vendor regardless of the quality of the product. And I think that the TSA has some sort of arrest powers that a private company wouldn't have, how do we back them up?

52 posted on 10/22/2012 8:33:47 AM PDT by Delhi Rebels (There was a row in Silver Street - the regiments was out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels

Apply consumer choice to your observation.
In other words, don’t fly with the airlines that do a poor job and treat their customers like crap.


53 posted on 10/22/2012 8:57:53 AM PDT by ExpatGator (I hate Illinois Nazis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There is agreement that the TSA should be eliminated. But what matters is the process to eliminate it.

To start with, the courts must be made to understand that profiling is *not* inherently bad. It is extensively used in Europe, and it works. America’s aversion to it dating to the Civil Rights era is “ancient history”.

Trying to create an illusion of “fairness” in security is just mind-bogglingly dumb. No, the odds of an elderly, Canadian Catholic woman in a wheelchair, traveling with her 5 year old granddaughter, being a terrorist, or being used by a terrorist, is infinitesimally tiny. Not worth it.

She is in no way comparable to a 30 year old Pakistani Muslim with a beard and turban, carrying a Koran, in a group of similar men. Stop pretending they are.

And stop pretending that “anybody” can look like a Muslim. While a minority of Muslims can look like non-Muslims, the vast majority of Muslims broadcast their beliefs clearly in their dress, luggage, language and behavior.

In practical terms, this means that instead of “fairly” oppressing *everyone* who wants to fly in aircraft, let the people of profiled groups know that they need to appear at the airport several hours early for a detailed examination.

As policy, they also can be restricted in how many of them can be on a particular flight, when and how they can conduct prayers in airports, etc.

It is *not* oppressive or racist. It just recognizes reality.

In any event, once the courts accept the new paradigm of security by profiling, *then* the TSA can turn over its function to private airport security.

And *then* the TSA can be dissolved.


54 posted on 10/22/2012 9:16:24 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (DIY Bumper Sticker: "THREE TIMES,/ DEMOCRATS/ REJECTED GOD")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
I agree - it’s kabuki theater security and just an immense hassle, carried out by largely minimum-wage cretins and costs billions. But obama will never shut it down - yet another reason to vote Romney.

It was a Republican administration and a RINO-led Congress that gave us the TSA and these patdowns that make some sheeple feel better.

Romney is even more liberal than Bush, and there is nothing in Romney's actual past or record to indicate that Romney would change the TSA, and Romney has surrounded himself with the same types of liberal and moderate RINOs that Bush did, and Congress will be even more liberal than it was under Bush, regardless of who comes out on top.

If you pin your hopes on Romney getting rid of the TSA, I feel sorry for you. It was nanny-staters like Romney and his advisers that helped usher in the TSA.
55 posted on 10/22/2012 12:42:10 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels
Unless Obama recently signed another one of those secret executive orders, TSA can not arrest you. The procedure is to detain you while police are dispatched to question and possibly arrest you. The TSA can fine you.

I do not have experience with tons of different companies but I have worked in buildings / properties with private securities. Even Barksdale Airforce Base utilizes civilian private security.

Many are retired military, police, fire or prison guards. Some are even medics and have emergency medical training.

They are well trained and very professional. They have a clear chain of command and a firm grasp of their responsibilities. Most importantly, the men and women I met were always aware that public safety was the most important thing, but it was also important that visitors had a somewhat positive experience!

They were always very firm but polite. They would engage with visitors on the property that looked lost, confused, angry, loud, or were having problems. They would approach the person and offer assistance, using the conversation to quickly ascertain if the person was a threat, who they were and where they were headed on the premises. They worked as a team to cover very large properties and relayed information from officer to officer when they discovered a person they wanted to keep eyes on.

I only ever heard of one security officer being fired for bad behavior. I wasn't there but he apparently harassed his ex-wife's new boyfriend while on duty. :p

Anyway, you can't really compare the TSA mess to good private security. One is a wasteful, sloppy, abusive, government over-reach. The other is a well practiced, skilled, professional, and (most of the time) friendly asset.

56 posted on 10/22/2012 1:15:40 PM PDT by Casie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Osama is dead -so what?

Thanks to the Muslim 0zer0, Islam remains not only alive but now even more a threat to the West. Benghazi was but another one of many canaries in the coal mine of leftist delusion -another canary the pacifists and anti Americans attempt to bury and pretend away...

If the war is over WHY do we still staff TSA?

-Romney should ask these questions:
When is the TSA drawdown scheduled?
What date will TSA pullout from our airports?

Let us be real -IF the need that premises the existence of TSA continues THEN we are still at war. Killing Osama Bin Laden did not end the war BECAUSE the war was never simply against Osama Bin Laden -it was and remains a war against Radical Islam.

It is time to get rid of the TSA -not because the war is over BUT because the TSA is NOT screening for Radical Islamists.

57 posted on 10/22/2012 5:06:43 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson