Posted on 10/22/2012 12:24:55 PM PDT by Snuph
The Libyan rights activist who the Democrat-media complex says was outed by Oversight Committee was previously brought to U.S. by the Obama State Department and featured and named on White House website.
This rights activist was hosted by the State Department for the International Visitor Program of the World Affairs Council in Seattle, Washington, in December 2011.
The House Oversight Committee reported:
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa issued the following statement in response to false Obama Administration claims that an Oversight Committee release of unclassified documents showing serious diplomatic security failures in Benghazi represented the first public association of the woman with the U.S.:
“The Libyan rights activist who was highlighted by the Obama administration in news accounts as having not been, ‘publicly associated with the U.S.’ until the Oversight Committee released documents had actually been brought to the U.S. in December 2011 by the State Department and her trip is highlighted on the Internet. President Obama should be ashamed of yet another example where his administration has been caught trying to mislead the American people about what happened in Libya.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
What a bunch of lying scumbags!!!
Still hours away from the debate and already getting this:
The connection has timed out
The server at www.freerepublic.com is taking too long to respond.
The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few
moments.
If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer’s network
connection.
If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure
that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.
Yes, it has been a busy day here on FR
Darn, was just getting set to post the over under time for the brown out.
I think I am going to be right. The Benghazi coverup is to protect Muslims in our state department, who were brought in by Obama and Clinton to decide appropriate methods of dealing with and being sensitive to the Muslims in the Middle eastern countries and situations as they arise. I believe this administration counseled with them about removing security detail, standing down on previous terror attacks, and not “overreacting” to the situation on 9/11/12. Obama deferred his responsibility to these Muslim state department people in the name of sensitivity, and that is what this is all about. It fits perfectly.
I think you owe an apology to all the lying scumbags.
Yeah. A bit too perfectly. It's yet another cover-up, a plausible explanation shuttered out before a gullible public to hide the truth:
That O'Bunga intentionally decreased the existing security force in place, and then refused to beef-up security in the face of repeated pleas that he do so, so that he could kill two birds with one stone.
First, knowing of the liklihood of the impending assault, he knew it would be a diversion from his abysmal track record of destructive fiscal policies and broken promises from Election 2008. Second, it was supposed to prompt a snatch-and-grab where he could then, in the 11th hour, sweep in and rescue the Ambassador, proving his bona fides as being tough on terror, and the right man to receive "that 3:00AM phone call." Right before the election.
As is often the case when a soulless pathalogical liar spins a few too many yarns, it blew-up in his cleaned-up, well-spoken face, and the Ambassador and several others ended up paying the ultimate price for O'Bungsuck's sociopathic Machiavellian proclivities.
This bastard should be tried, prosecuted and jailed for life for his repeated, incessant treason against America. The bed-wetting fag.
;-\
What we have here is a blown intelligence operation. It was blown before the attack. Why didn’t our guys on the ground there know it?
How about we find out who we trusted who double crossed us? Could be more than one person. Could be already dead.
As Eric Nordstrom said at the hearing...”I feel like the TALIBAN is IN THE BUILDING”!!! Newt says he’s talking about the State Dept.....but I think he could be talking about the WHITE HOUSE!
It’s unfortunate.
Sometimes after work and before a gig I’ll take a short nap so I can be rested for a long night. It would be cool if they could reboot (or something) so the site is limbered up for all the action it’s gonna get ;-)
I think I am going to be right. The Benghazi coverup is to protect Muslims in our state department, who were brought in by Obama and Clinton to decide appropriate methods of dealing with and being sensitive to the Muslims in the Middle eastern countries and situations as they arise. I believe this administration counseled with them about removing security detail, standing down on previous terror attacks, and not “overreacting” to the situation on 9/11/12. Obama deferred his responsibility to these Muslim state department people in the name of sensitivity, and that is what this is all about. It fits perfectly.
I think you are on to something. seem to recall someone making a quote at
The hearings to the effect that “ the Taliban are inside” . Believe it was Eric Norstrom commenting on requests for additional security.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.