How Bill Clinton May Have Hurt the Obama Campaign (The blame game begins...)

NY Times ^ | 10/24/12 | MATT BAI

[jimbo123]

When the histories of the 2012 campaign are written, much will be made of Bill Clinton’s re-emergence. His convention speech may well have marked the finest moment of President Obama’s re-election campaign, and his ads on the president’s behalf were memorable.

But there is one crucial way in which the 42nd president may not have served the 44th quite as well. In these final weeks before the election, Mr. Clinton’s expert advice about how to beat Mitt Romney is starting to look suspect.

[GOPJ]

One thing can be said about the New York Times - they NEVER did anything to hurt the Obama Campaign. They're no Clinton - not a fair weather friend. Nope, they've got that schmaltzy loyalty thing down pad - like one dead drunk for another ...

Matt Bai can be proud of his paper - an organization that has the best Press Release rewrite men in the business ...

The White House sends over talking points - suggestions - whatever, you know press releases and the New York Times hits overdrive in the re-write department. Obama and dems must be thrilled.

PRNewswire doesn't hold a candle to these boys.... Yeah, we're all impressed. Really. Really and truly impressed.... they suck more - or is it less? Something like that...

[Obadiah]

Down goes Frazier. Down goes Frazier. Down goes Frazier.

Come on, man. You have to do it right.

[timestax]

Here is a better one. I added the exclamation point to the newspaper headline !