Skip to comments.Clinton: Facebook and Twitter are Not Evidence
Posted on 10/24/2012 4:50:20 PM PDT by Eleutheria5
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton downplayed the suggestion that emails implicating an Al Qaeda-linked group in the attack on the American embassy in Benghazi were proof of terrorist involvement, saying their claims of responsibility on Facebook and Twitter were not "evidence."
The recently obtained emails, which raise questions about whether the White House was trying to cover up the nature of the attack, show that the State Department told administration officials and the FBI within two hours of the attack on the consulate that the terrorist group Ansar al Sharia had claimed responsibility.
"These emails make clear that your Administration knew within two hours of the attack that it was a terrorist act and that Ansar al-Sharia, a Libyan militant group with links to Al-Qaeda, had claimed responsibility for it," Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) wrote in a letter to President Obama. "This latest revelation only adds to the confusion surrounding what you and your Administration knew about the attacks in Benghazi, when you knew it, and why you responded to those tragic events in the ways that you did.
"The American people have the right to know what information your Administration was receiving about the attacks in Benghazi once they began, when you received it, how you reacted to it, and why you and other members of your Administration continued for days after the attack to speak about it in ways that increasingly seem at odds with intelligence and other reporting that you had available to you, they wrote. We urge you to address the American people directly on these and other vital questions that still surround the tragic murder of our fellow citizens last month in Libya."
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
Already building your line of defense, Hillary?
Good, you’ll need it.
But a YouTube video caused everything!
Alright then, good enough for me. Let’s move on.
It’s only evidence if it’s right wing comments or videos on youtube from Christian film makers.
Looks like a few of us will be making meme photos in the near future.
Hillary is such a dumb beaver..Hey Hill, I got news for you..when Al Qaeda commits terrorist attacks the majority of the time they post the info ONLINE..This is probably the same woman who believed that her hubby’s bodily fluids on Lewinsky’s dress wasn’t “Evidence” either
what a coverup
Even if this argument was plausible, it doesn’t change the fact there was no justification for all of that declaration that it was just a spontaneous protest that got out of hand over a video. That still has no credible explanation.
But if it’s on Youtube (like the film) it must be true, right Madame Foggy Bottom?
A hundred guys with mortars, rockets, and heavy machine guns attacking your embassy is evidence of a terrorist attack. The seven hour fire-fight is evidence of a terrorist attack.
The Al Qaeda claim of responsibility is just icing on the cake. Parsing words isn’t going to make this go away.
Yes, they are.
Either way, it shows they were pretty clueless and an American ambassador has been killed in the line of duty, the first time us diplomat killed in the line of duty since 1979. The last one was Adolph Dubs who was kidnapped and shot by terrorists in Afghanistan who were almost certainly taking orders from the Soviet Union
Was the live drone video of the attack on Facebook and Twitter Hillary? Is that why you did not believe your lying eyes?
No but if you look on the Library table you will find the evidence right under the Rose Law Firm’s billing records.
They're not PROOF, but they're EVIDENCE.
“But a YouTube video caused everything!”
Step down, Hillary. You’re a disgrace.
IIRC, Iranian revolutionaries used Twitter a few years ago.
clintonh8r: Being famous is not a qualification for being Secretary of State.
This is all such postering by congress. Where's the date certain demanding it be addressed now and certainly before November 5th? And if the hildebeast is still playing semantics she should be asked to resign NOW.
‘her hubbys bodily fluids on Lewinskys dress, either’
The problem for hill was that she could not identify the fluid on the blue dress.
Not only that. How many times have members of the military gotten in trouble for facebook posts? Not evidence?
WHAT an ugly enabling weasel this witch is. From semen soaked blue dresses to bloody fingerprints on pillars, she always supports her ‘daddy’ figure. and THIS is supposed to be a ‘woman’ FOR women? SHE is the enemy to the feminine and to the truth. B*tch.
Neither are Rose Law Firm billing records if
They are kept hidden until the day after the
statute of limitations pass.
We know your game you crooked evil anti miliary
It’s not evidence until Hillary Clinton’s new legal team leaks it via back channels, just like the recent emails.
Remember: “We all had the same intelligence” -Hillary Clinton
and a pdf is nor a long form Birth certificate
She’s a money-grubbing Democrat grifter. There’s money involved in this. I don’t know if it’s Saudi money or Russian money or Chinese money or Soros money, but there’s money involved. I would keep a close eye on her. She may run to an embassy for asylum.
It was nice of Billy boy to get a team of lawyers for Hitlery. She is going to really need them.
Obozo, the laughing hyena, Panetta, Rice and Hillary sure got a lot of “splaining” to do. Where was Petraeus as this unfolded...
Hill wasn’t any better at answering that 3 A.M. phone call than Obozo was....
At some point, we the people are going to revolt against the abomination that our judicial system has become.
We have ceased to recognize obvious truth and evidence and we have allowed the system to be taken over by corrupt and self-serving lawyers who twist and parse every sentence to make it mean something that it does not, and then who obtain legal decisions based not on what is just but on what they can get away with via technicalities and loopholes.
Lawyers like the Clintons think they can manipulate their way out of every situation by clever word choices. What is worse is that we let them.
Hillary would still be trying to figure out if Pearl Harbor was a planned attack or spontaneous reaction to a Charlie Chan movie..
Gee! If ‘social networking’ sites are “not evidence”, then why has the Federal Government announced, during the Obama Administration, through the DHS, that ‘social networking’ sites, were going to be monitored, at all??????
Hopefully Obama will lose to Romney, but the 2013 Republican House (pray) and the new Republican Senate (pray more) will be in session three weeks before Inauguration Day.
A January Impeachment would be like a second Christmas Morning, and Romney taking the Oath of Office would be the third.
Oh to dream the dreams of Kings and Vagabonds...
The Obama admin sat around and watched that while pretending it wasn't happening, too.
“The Independent Accountability Review Board”
Who are they?
Has anyone heard of them before????
So they can not prove anything.