Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Panetta has said US "didn't have enough information" on Benghazi to act.

Panetta said he and senior U.S. military commanders felt strongly that they should not put U.S. forces at risk at the time.

He said — quote — ‘‘It was really over before we had the opportunity to really know what was happening.’’ More here.

Un-freeking-believable.

13 posted on 10/25/2012 1:18:45 PM PDT by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jane Long
That is an absolutely pathetic and unbelievable excuse. They would have had no idea how long the people there might hold out. They could have put assets in the air and had up to two hours to decide whether to use them while they were enroute. But nothing was deployed.

Panetta's excuse is no different than a field commander getting a call from one of his squads saying they were pinned down and being overrun and responding "We probably can't get to them. Let's forget about it."

19 posted on 10/25/2012 2:05:09 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Jane Long
Looks like we have a thread with that article:

Panetta: US lacked early info on Benghazi attack

50 posted on 10/25/2012 9:48:49 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson