Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fido969

Well, I could say that it’s more likely a black man named George Jones (say) would be a good president than a black man named Barack Obama. The name speaks of his non acculturation. He was an exotic oddball.


11 posted on 10/29/2012 7:42:45 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (cat dog, cat dog, alone in the world is a little cat dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

I contend that, by virtue of the national culture in which he was raised, and the defining beliefs and attitudes of the people that nurtured and influenced him during his childhood and youth (and this has nothing to do with his place of birth), plus the results of this developmental milieu as clearly demonstrated through and by his words and his actions, Barack Hussein Obama is a Kenyan and a Muslim. His personal formational life experiences shared no part of the life experiences of America’s multitude of black-skinned citizens, nearly all of them descendants of African slaves, born in America and lifelong residents of these United States.

First bathed as a young child in the anti-colonialism venom of his Kenyan forbears; then while approaching manhood steeped in the Marxist philosophy of a radical mentor named Frank Marshall Davis; later immersed by a demagogic preacher named Wright in the doctrines of Black Liberation theology, a gross Marxist perversion of the Gospel of Jesus Christ; honed by his associations with Wm. Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, both radical terroristic enemies of capitalism and representative government, and especially enemies of all things American; further schooled in Saul Alinsky’s Socialism-advocating, manipulative techniques of community organization, Barack Obama emerged a full-fledged socialist autocrat, prepared and determined to fundamentally transform the United States of America. This is his clearly stated intent and vow.

Obama’s “fundamentally transformed” America would be a unitary socialist republic, with the present 50 sovereign states reduced to the status of dependent provinces (although much of their originally intended sovereignty already has been gradually surrendered to or traduced by our federal “national” government), the whole completely subject to and ruled by a socialist autocrat; a dictator whose edicts would be enforced and administered by and through czars personally appointed by and responsible only to him. The Constitution of the United States of America, which clearly he holds in disdain, he would relegate to the trashbin of history.


18 posted on 10/29/2012 8:38:32 AM PDT by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson