Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pew study on US elections finds social media postings "relentlessly negative"
Guardian.co.uk via news360 ^ | November 2, 2012 | Katie Rogers

Posted on 11/02/2012 11:47:19 AM PDT by upbeat5

As the marathon campaign season wraps up researchers confirm what many have suspected: civility has taken a vacation

If the political postings you've seen lately on Facebook and Twitter seem particularly outrageous, it's because they are.

From the beginning of the political conventions to the eve of the final debate, social media and blog postings about US presidential candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney have been relentlessly negative, according to a new Pew study.

"We found social media very harsh," Tom Rosenstiel, director of Pew's Project for Excellence in Journalism, told the Guardian. "We also found it fairly insensitive to events. It moved some but was pretty relentlessly negative about both candidates, particularly Romney."

There is no doubt mainstream media coverage influences what is being said on social media, especially on Facebook, where users tend to be more politically engaged and often more partisan. In the Pew analysis, two outlets in particular were clearly slanted in opposite directions: for every 23 stories published by MSNBC about Romney, only one is positive. At Fox News, only about one in every eight stories published about Obama is positive.

With coverage of this campaign markedly more negative than 2008, it's leaking over into what we're sharing. By all accounts we're going stir crazy: everything's offensive, outrageous, or both at once. And, sometimes, the constant pot-stirring results in the breakdown of friendships between people of differing political stripes.

The tension is especially palpable on Facebook. Pew's team found that conversation about both candidates hit overdrive on the social network after the 3 October presidential debate, an event considered a solid victory for Romney. Since that evening, the conversation has gotten decidedly less civil, perhaps because social media conversation is already more partisan than what is found in public opinion or in mainstream media, according to Rosenstiel.

When this writer posed a question about political clashes on Facebook, Chicago attorney Walker Lawrence said Thursday he'd been "unfriended" for "my support for Obama ... happened this year and in 2008."

As for Twitter, a comparatively smaller, more self-selecting network, negative statements about Obama outweighed positive by less than 2-to-1. For Romney it was close to 4-to-1.

"It is a great way to learn about events," Rosenstiel added, "but it is not, certainly at this point in history, a proxy of the electorate."

Patience is boiling over on both networks as Americans near the end of a marathon election cycle. Earlier this year, Pew's Internet and American Life project found that 18% of users have unfriended or blocked someone online due to political issues. With only a few days to go until the election, don't be surprised if the number rises - if only just until sometime in mid-November.

But even as tempers flare this week and next, an increasingly rare story sparked by social media is bringing people together instead of tearing them apart. After many months without anything like it, a viral video of Fort Collins toddler Abigael Evans emerged on YouTube this week.

"I'm tired of Bronco Bamma and Mitt Romney," the red-eyed four-year-old blubbered into an NPR reporter's camera, and charmed millions of jaded YouTube viewers as she was literally bored to tears.

Thousands of exhausted people smiled knowingly and hit the share button.

US elections 2012 Social media Barack Obama Internet Twitter Facebook US politics Mitt Romney

Katie Rogers guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: media; pew; social; study
I wonder if Pew Research made note while doing this study that Pres. Obama is the most divisive president in our history.
1 posted on 11/02/2012 11:47:27 AM PDT by upbeat5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: upbeat5

Pew is lashing out against the people expressing their opinions.

They prefer the “relentlessly negative” media attacks on conservatives and Republicans.

We are just responding and giving equal time for the other side. Pew outs itself.


2 posted on 11/02/2012 11:53:19 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upbeat5
Reading between the lines here, it appears that Democrats are overwhelmingly harsh toward anyone who disagrees with them. Republicans can fall into the same pattern of behavior, but do so in a less pronounced way.

As an example:
A few years ago I saw a neighbor. She's very left-wing. I didn't attack her. I didn't personalize a problem, or point fingers -- but I did want to tweak her a little bit and indicate that Obama's America had not turned into a paradise.
I said, "This unemployment is really something, huh?"

She replied: "You Republicans are all racists! You just hate him because he's black! At least he's not stupid like Bush!!"

So ... yeah. Our society has become somewhat uncivil. I don't really feel that it's my fault.

3 posted on 11/02/2012 11:55:18 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Global Warming is a religion, and I don't want to be taxed to pay for a faith that is not mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upbeat5
Sorry, Buchanan gets that title.

After the Civil War it'll take a lot to beat out this guy!

4 posted on 11/02/2012 12:08:23 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upbeat5
"Civility" occurs when the peasants shut up and do as they are told.
5 posted on 11/02/2012 12:09:32 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the psychopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upbeat5

Twitter is liberal land.
http://politics.twittersentiment.org/streams/
Click on the “tweets/annotations” link for the tweets: foul language.


6 posted on 11/02/2012 12:22:45 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upbeat5

Social media, and the internet in general, have debased the culture and is destroying civility.


7 posted on 11/02/2012 12:31:21 PM PDT by Paradox (I want Obama defeated. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upbeat5

” - - - for every 23 stories published by MSNBC about Romney, only one is positive. “

Is this evidence that MSNBC and the White House are guilty of collusion to fix the National Election?


8 posted on 11/02/2012 12:36:04 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upbeat5

Well, after a peak at all the threats to riot and/or assassinate Romney if he wins, I think “harsh” is a pretty good description of the hatred out there. I sure am glad we’re the side who owns most of the guns.


9 posted on 11/02/2012 12:42:45 PM PDT by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson