Posted on 11/05/2012 7:28:56 PM PST by Individual Rights in NJ
This is just some NYT ‘blog drivel. The writer speculates that the victory [sic] might be rooted in the GM/Chrysler bailout.
actually, this belongs under “breaking WIND!”
Do not fall for believing exit polls today. We should know by now that they are not reliable.
“My take on why polls are not correct is the well known as the “Wilder Effect”.”
I remember this being trotted out in 2008 (the “Bradley effect”) when they thought Obama was going to lose and they were going to blame racism. It didn’t materilaize at the time, but I think it might this year because since day 1 (even during the Dem primaries) any criticism of the unqualified affirmative action token was dismissed (and attacked) as “racist”. Four years later the only way people can indicate displeasure with Obama without repercussions is in the privacy of the voting booth - let’s hope they do it!
Subscriptions to the NY Times are rising too. NOT.
Yes, except in their case,instead of guns and Bibles, it’s dingleberries.....
Bradley it was.
The party apparatchiks often have a good flow of vote Intel. It was about this time in’92 that Bush 41’s people told him that he’d lost to Clinton. So Priebus could be on to something or just blowing smoke cause he doesn’t know. Luckily my power’s still out so I can’t follow this. I’ll vote, cook dinner on the grill, read by LED flashlight and go to bed. I’ll wake up and see if we still have a country.
I’m not sure what you’re getting at but the rest of the thread seemed to fully understand the intention of the post.
Get a grip.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.