Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

The guy went to a Republican not a Democrat, is that because it is his Rep? Or does that mean that somehow the Democrats couldn’t be trusted because it is something that the Democrats (administration) are involved with?


34 posted on 11/10/2012 11:13:41 PM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Irenic
The guy went to a Republican not a Democrat, is that because it is his Rep? Or does that mean that somehow the Democrats couldn’t be trusted because it is something that the Democrats (administration) are involved with?

I will make a guess at your question. Liberals could care less what Petraeus was doing or with whom so long as he could be counted upon to do what they required. From what I have read this affair has not been a 'secret' to the administration. And most likely Petraeus would have testified as if nothing was amiss until the whistle-blower let the Republicans in on the investigation.

Once the Republicans were told, there is no way Petraeus could go and testify at a hearing with the possibility that one of those Republicans might ask him about his affair. Petraeus had to go. Can you imagine what kind of tv it would make for a Republican to ask Petraeus, when did President Obama know about your affair?

40 posted on 11/10/2012 11:22:45 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson