Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
Benghazi Index
“some members of Congress were relying on the media for information that they should have been briefed on.”
No wonder our elected representatives are such morons. You can’t rely on the media for anything accurate or truthful.
First of all, I thought he was already under oath?
Second: check out the pic at the top of the article at Gen P’s confirmation hearing. I did not know that Ms Broadwell was in attendance. Right up front and center.
Patraeus has proven he`s not worthy of off-the-record trust. Put that philandering, lying POS under oath and question him publicly or don`t bother.
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
Where in the article does it say he may not be under oath when he testifies?
If he’s not- then it’s a useless exercise.
William Colby was pulled into Congress and put under oath. It too bad no one even remembers William’s name.
Petraeus was the subject of an Obama organized FBI grift and blackmail worthy of J. Edgar Hoover in the old days.One can only hope that Petraeus has enough fortitude to tell the truth about Benghazi, instead of the Obama talking points on the subject.If not , then the good general needs to be turned upside down and shaken vigorously.
UNaccountability porn and secrecy porn all rolled into one little incestuous bed.
R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.
Why should he be ‘allowed’ to decide how, when, and where he testifies? If it’s not under oath, it’s worthless.
How ‘bout we let him testify “under the desk” instead???
Oath, smoath. You can have him swear on a ten foot tall stack of Bibles and it won’t matter. Oaths mean nothing to the man as evidenced by his oath to God and his wife regarding his marriage. He also took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution too. The man is dishonorable.