Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To Win, Obama Sacrifices House, State Legislatures
Townhall.com ^ | November 15, 2012 | Michael Barone

Posted on 11/15/2012 6:11:29 AM PST by Kaslin

Barack Obama attended more than 200 fundraisers for his presidential campaign, but he refrained from raising money for congressional Democrats.

That proved to be a wise move for him, as were his strategists' decisions to run heavy ad campaigns against Mitt Romney and to build an even more effective turnout machine in target states.

But it proved to be less than helpful to his party. Democrats did gain two Senate seats thanks to clueless Republican candidates and Republicans' failure to produce better turnout.

But Democrats got beaten badly in races for the U.S. House and state legislatures. That's clear when you compare the number of House Democrats after this year's election with the number of House Democrats after 2008.

Democrats came out of the 2008 election with 257 seats in the House, well above the majority of 218. That enabled a tough Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, to squeeze out majorities on unpopular measures like the stimulus package, cap and trade, and Obamacare.

Two of the three were big liberal policy victories (cap and trade went nowhere in the Senate). But the Democratic Party paid a price in 2010 -- and kept paying in 2012.

Democrats have won or are currently leading in 201 seats in the House. (All these numbers could change slightly in final counts.)

Between 2008 and 2012, they gained seats in only three states: Delaware, where a popular Republican ran for the Senate in 2010; Maryland, thanks to Democratic redistricting; and California, where a supposedly nonpartisan redistricting commission was dominated by Democrats.

The reapportionment process following the 2010 Census cost Democrats some seats because their strong states had relatively little population growth. They have five fewer seats in New York, for example.

The reapportionment effect was strengthened because the 2010 backlash against Democrats gave Republicans control of redistricting in Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania, all of which lost seats, and North Carolina, which stayed the same.

As a result, in the 113th Congress, as compared to the 111th, there will be three fewer Democrats from Michigan, six fewer from Ohio, seven fewer from Pennsylvania and four fewer from North Carolina.

Democratic losses were greatest in the South, which gained seven seats from reapportionment. There will be 22 fewer Southern Democrats and 29 more Southern Republicans in the House next year than there were in 2009.

Another way to look at it: 123 of 201 House Democrats will be from the Northeast, the West Coast, Hawaii and Illinois. Only 23 are from the Midwest outside of Illinois and only 42 from the South.

Obama was able to build his electoral vote majority thanks to big Democratic majorities from core constituencies concentrated in these states, which gave him 207 electoral votes.

But the concentration of blacks, Hispanics and gentry liberals means there are fewer Democratic votes in the suburbs, the countryside and the geographic heartland. The Obama campaign strategy concentrated on turning out core voters. That left House Democrats short of the votes they needed elsewhere.

In state legislative races, Democrats also rebounded from 2010, but fell far short of the losses they sustained then. They went into the 2010 election with 53 percent of state senators across the country and 56 percent of state lower House members. (Nebraska elects its one legislative chamber on a nonpartisan basis.)

Democrats came out of the 2012 election with only 46 percent of state senators and 48 percent of state lower House seats.

In that time, they gained seats in both chambers in only three states: New Jersey (one seat in each body), Illinois and California.

Democrats still hold most legislative seats in the Northeast. But Republicans now have more state legislators in the Midwest, West and South.

The changes in the South have been especially striking. Democrats went into the 2010 election with 51 percent of state senators and lower House members in the South. They came out of the 2012 election with 38 percent of state senators and 40 percent of lower House members.

Looking back, Bill Clinton's re-election coalition worked better for his party than Barack Obama's.

Clinton carried the popular vote in the South, as well as the other three regions. Obama lost the popular vote in the South and carried it by only 3 percent in the Midwest.

The presidential election results looked a lot like 2008's. But the farther down the ballot you go, the more the results look like 2010's.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012election; fundraising; nancypelosi; obama

1 posted on 11/15/2012 6:11:38 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How did the fraud work into this. Did they simply spot in cards for Obama and scan them?


2 posted on 11/15/2012 6:14:47 AM PST by struggle (http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Leading from behind.................


3 posted on 11/15/2012 6:18:20 AM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Then again, why should a guy who is well on his way to installing himself as a dictator worry about such things?


4 posted on 11/15/2012 6:18:54 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle; All

What most refuse to acknowledge is that it was unlikely that ANYBODY could have beaten the voter fraud planned and perpetrated by the Obama machine. They seem to prefer pointing fingers, blaming Romney and blathering on about Patraeus' sex life.


Col Allen West; "I don't want to see America become like Zimbabwe where people don’t trust their electoral process. If we cannot trust the integrity of the voting system then we are no longer a free republic".

Col West has opened the door.

We must fight election fraud.

It falls on ‘We the People’.

Silence is consent

There’s overwhelming evidence of fraud.- Here


_________________________________________________

SARAH PALIN speaks out on Twitter about massive Obama machine voter fraud:

>Sarah Palin News ‏@SarahPalinLinks Between suppression of the military vote and voter fraud, Obama stole another election. http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/46302 …DEMAND A RECOUNT! #VoterFraud

>Sarah Palin News ‏@SarahPalinLinks People need to stop pointing fingers within the GOP and investigate the Dems' massive voter fraud and suppression of the military vote.

MITT ROMNEY TWEETS ABOUT ELECTION FRAUD:

>MITT ROMNEY in 2012! ‏@PlanetRomney #tcot The Competent Conservative: Elections Have Not Yet Been Certified, Here’s What You Can Do:

>> These electi... http://bit.ly/Zzam8Y

Here

Excerpt from Mitt Romney's reference:

These elections are NOT certified yet. The only way to get this investigated, much less recounted or overturned, is through the Secretary of State of each of the five key states: Florida, Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. EVEN IF YOU ARE IN ANOTHER STATE you can help. But it won’t do any good to dilute our effort to challenge California or Michigan or other states. Until a major group gets involved to do more, here is the plan: Contact the Secretary of State of the state in question. See contact information below...

Read the rest- Here

___________________________________________________



The website,'Barack Obama Vote Fraud 2012' is keeping a running account of cases of voter fraud and what to do about it:

(Astonishing!) > Visit the site- Here
Sign this petition- Here

Another website:

Is There Enough Evidence of Voter Fraud To Merit a Recount? If you wish to add your voice, click here and sign the petition for a recount Here-

< Hannity and Col Allan West slam voter fraud Nov 12- Here

Photo of SOMALIANS brought to Ohio voting stations by the busload, 95% of whom did not speak English, and told to vote for Obama, straight Dem ticket- Here

Must watch videos!

VIDEO-- Programmer Testifies About Rigging Elections With Vote Counting- Here

VIDEO- Illegal Aliens Caught Voting and Stealing Elections In Florida In Vast Numbers- Here

VIDEO- MICHAEL SAVAGE: How Obama fixed the 2012 election- Here

VIDEO- Massive voter fraud discovered in April- Here

VIDEO- Whistle blower speaks out about voter fraud- Here

___________________________________________________


We can not wait for 2014 and 2016 to regroup and figure out new strategies. By then it will be too late. The Marxist/Muslim usurper will have completed his planned distruction of America. That's what people fail to understand.

We must act NOW.

Start with the election. If we let the Rats get away with this massive voter fraud, we're no better than a bananna republic.

We must keep digging and pounding him every day, in every way we can- phony birth certificate, Benghazi, Fast and Furious, his hidden life, records....

We are FReepers. We must fight!

Those who shrug and accept this atrocity without a fight are not worthy to be called Freepers!

Join us!! See thread, 'BARACK OBAMA FRAUD 2012- (MUST READ- MUST GO VIRAL!)' thread- Here




5 posted on 11/15/2012 6:21:13 AM PST by patriot08 (Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: struggle

You have got to ask? The rats cannot win an election without fraud. Which includes letting dead people vote. Also letting illegalvote and letting people more then once vote.


6 posted on 11/15/2012 6:22:15 AM PST by Kaslin ( One Big Ass Mistake America (Make that Two))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Contact List:

(1) Mitt Romney
http://www.mittromney.com/forms/suggestions
(2) Republican National Committee
http://www.gop.com/contact-us/Fox News
(3) National Republican Senatorial Committee
http://www.nrsc.org/contact-us/
(4) National Republican Congressional Committee
E-mail: website@nrcc.org
(5) FOX News
foxnewstips@foxnews.com
(6) FOX News
Friends@foxnews.com
(7) Rush Limbaugh
ElRushbo@eibnet.com
(8) Mark Levin
http://www.marklevinshow.com/contactus.asp
(9) Shawn Hanity
http://www.hannity.com/contact
(10) Laura Ingraham
http://www.lauraingraham.com/help
(11) Michelle Malkin
Email: writemalkin@gmail.com
(12) Newt Gingrich
http://www.newt.org/contact/
STATE GOVERNORS
(1) Rick Scott, Governor of Florida
http://www.flgov.com/contact-gov-scott/email-the-governor/
(2) John R. Kasich, Governor of Ohio
http://governor.ohio.gov/Contact/ContacttheGovernor.aspx
(3) Bob McDonnell, Governor of Virginia
http://www.governor.virginia.gov/AboutTheGovernor/contactGovernor.cfm
(4) Scott Walker, Governor of Wisconsin
govgeneral@wisconsin.gov
(5)Tom Corbett, Governor of Pennsylvania
http://sites.state.pa.us/PA_Exec/Governor/govmail.html
(6) Rick Snyder, Governor of Michigan
rick.snyder@michigan.gov
Please contact your senators as well.


7 posted on 11/15/2012 6:25:02 AM PST by patriot08 (Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s easier to focus a big national campaign on a few senate races. They’ll be able to work on everything else later now that they have the WH and Senate secured.


8 posted on 11/15/2012 6:29:40 AM PST by ari-freedom (It's the bennies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
"They’ll be able to work on everything else later now that they have the WH and Senate secured."

Secured? Uh, no. They have to defend 20 Senate seats in 2014, and the GOP only 13. Plus Brown may pick up Kerry's MA seat if he goes cabinet.

Bobo doesn't give a rat's ass about the House. He treated them like dirt when they had it, and now that they don't, that's simply more time for golf...

9 posted on 11/15/2012 6:56:20 AM PST by StAnDeliver (Own It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver
Exactly. Truth be told, he doesn't really give a rat's ass about the U.S. Senate either unless there was an infinitesimal chance that the GOP could get the two-thirds majority necessary to override his veto or impeach him. And there isn't as demonstrated by the election or re-election of joke candidates in GOP states like Indiana, Missouri and North Dakota because too many women voted with their "lady parts" instead of their brains.

ObaMao will behave like an absolute monarch and his puppets in the U.S. Senate (including some Republicans) will behave like a privy council.

10 posted on 11/15/2012 7:11:45 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So we have all these all these majorities and secretary of state elections in 2014.

It’s time to get voter ID in as many states as we can. That is our top priority.

Then we go after the public unions.


11 posted on 11/15/2012 7:20:50 AM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! [You can vote Democrat when you're dead]...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is in keeping with a POTUS who rammed through health care reform on a party-line vote despite FERVENT public opposition knowing that his party would pay a steep price in the 2010 elections (which they did). The guy’s swinging for the history books: he doesn’t much care how much carnage he creates to get there.


12 posted on 11/15/2012 7:21:39 AM PST by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Grampa Dave; thouworm; sickoflibs; justiceseeker93; Libloather; Condor51
The Demo'rats cannot win an election without fraud. Which includes letting dead people vote.

In Chicago, you can be a registered Republican your entire life---but once you';re dead, you vote the straight Democratic ticket.

13 posted on 11/15/2012 7:29:53 AM PST by Liz ("Come quickly, I'm tasting the stars," Dom Perignon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Kaslin; Grampa Dave; thouworm; justiceseeker93; Libloather; Condor51
RE :”The Demo’rats cannot win an election without fraud. Which includes letting dead people vote.
.....
In Chicago, you can be a registered Republican your entire life-—but once you’;re dead, you vote the straight Democratic ticket.”

Except who voted is recorded and checked against who registered. That is why both parties use those records to get out their vote, they know who voted and who didn't and their party affiliation.

So if there was massive voter fraud based on dead people in any district that is easy to show proof of. In fact wouldnt Rs have plenty of time to check to see if those registered were still alive BEFORE the election?

I am pretty sure that Dems didnt have to cheat to win Chicago, more-so have O win it.

Remember this ?
Dont believe the polls. The Democrats are over-sampled in them all except that one showing Romney ahead. They are just trying to head-fake us so we give up. Romney will cream Obama.”

14 posted on 11/15/2012 8:02:24 AM PST by sickoflibs (How long before cry-Bohner caves to O again? They took the House for what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“But it proved to be less than helpful to his party.”

His is a party of one.


15 posted on 11/15/2012 10:56:37 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“But it proved to be less than helpful to his party.”

His is a party of one.


16 posted on 11/15/2012 11:14:52 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

The crooked ward pols know all the tricks.

One old-timer told me the party machine bribes poll-watchers to leave the polls just for an hour while the crooks do the dirty work.

Some poll-watchers were offered brand new homes to go take a walk.

In other cases, when they roll in the voting machines the
winning votes have already been cast-——in the warehouse.


17 posted on 11/15/2012 4:53:43 PM PST by Liz ("Come quickly, I'm tasting the stars," Dom Perignon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: patriot08
Thanks for posting. Circulated some of your links, checked some others as well.

Re the Ohio Somalis, the article implied (by subtraction) that some 20,000 of them are (maybe?) citizens and eligible to vote. But there is certainly a concern in any big city with lots of non-English-speaking immigrants, whether non-citizens are being shepherded to the polls by "community organizers".

18 posted on 11/15/2012 8:31:37 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson