Obama told Rice to lie ,Rice kissed his feet and goose stepped out to Sunday morning TV
“CIA talking points for Susan Rice called Benghazi attack “spontaneously inspired” by protests”
CIA talking points for Susan Rice were purposely designed to Give Aid and Comfort to Our Enemies.
There fixed it.
How the worm turns....
In the second debate (the Crowley debate) Obama said he called it a terroist attack “from day one”. So why would he give the wrong talking points to Rice and congress. He was definately lying to someone. Either he was lying to Rice when he sent her out on the Sunday shows or he was lying to 60 million people watching the debates. Either way, he has just been caught lying (again).
Wonder who put THIS talking point of the Talking Point out??
Did CBS get these papers from the same who gave papers to Dan Rather about George Bush? Hahahaha!! LMAO!!
Hey, On Friday Petraeus was resigning because of an “extramarital affair” By yesterday it is a “SEX SCANDAL”.
So much for honesty from the nation’s President during the 2012 debates. I am still trying to understand how dumbed down our population has become. It is lost.
They were watching the drone live feed and knew it was not a demonstration but a planned military attack!
Obama plainly said she used the info she had.
He is like the Clintons. Very literal with the escape route included in the statement.
Never alone, didn’t have sex. It’s all in their desired definition.
It’s always not the full facts, and the MSM isn’t brave enough to use his own
” know a BS’er when you see one”
I can not believe we are so stupid to elect obama for a 2nd term.
The knowing telling of an untruth with intent to deceive and induce reliance.
A lot of us have been throwing around accusations that Rice lied. If she relied on talking points supplied to her directly by the CIA it seems to me she has the right to claim innocence of lying but she has to plead guilty to criminal naïveté and be disbarred from high office.
Rather than discount entirely this story, let us accept that she received talking points as described from the CIA. Immediately one wants to know who in the CIA wrote those talking points and who was responsible for them. Enter former head of the CIA General Petreus, why might he have been involved in presenting false talking points and why might he have rendered false testimony to Congress (whether under oath or not he is legally obligated to tell the truth on pain of criminal sanction) confirming that the "demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault "?
Rather than accept that Obama simply blackmailed Petreus the far more likely scenario has already been told to us in part by his mistress in her speech in Denver in which she stated that the CIA was keeping prisoners in the Annex. Evidently, this is a crime for the CIA to keep prisoners. There was a high degree of motivation in the head of the CIA to keep that criminality secret not just because it was something that might implicate him personally but because it would discredit American foreign policy, if you accept the Obama view that making nice to terrorists is a foreign policy.
Petreus might have regarded it as an act patriotism; at the time he saw himself acting to protect the institution and the country. He might even have believed that he was nobly falling on his sword for his Commander-In-Chief.
If that is the case, it was a case of grossly misplaced patriotism worse than the Iran-Contra affair. We will have to see what transpires Friday in Petreus' testimony when it gets leaked.
This comes out now that the CIA has been discredited and Graham threatens to tie up Rice’s nomination.
OK. What kind of an idiot goes out to talk on five news shows about a subject she knows nothing about. Shouldn’t a Secretary of State be smarter than a tape recorder?
CIA talking points? Or talking points prepared by the White House and called “CIA Talking Points”? Question for CBS: Is the talking points document signed? (Why do I feel we have been through something like this with Dan Rather?)