OFFICIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Posted on 11/16/2012 6:40:41 PM PST by Seizethecarp
An angry statement just sworn by the lead investigator of a team assigned to review Barack Obama’s birth certificate says Hawaii officials – who are Democrats like Obama – are using “elaborate non-cooperation” to conceal birth records from law enforcement and the public.
Zullo, a seasoned sleuth who heads the team deputized by Joe Arpaio, recently re-elected sheriff of Maricopa County, Ariz., fingers Hawaii’s governor, deputy attorney general and health department chiefs as obstructing justice.
Zullo’s affidavit charges these officials are “hiding” original birth records, thwarting the posse’s hunt for those who forged the document at the White House website.
His detailed catalog of Hawaii’s misfeasance is shocking.
The department, Zullo said, “has engaged in what the sheriff’s investigators believe is a systematic effort to hide from law enforcement and the public whatever original 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may have in its possession.”
Officials “changed their policies and procedures in a manner calculated to hinder our law-enforcement investigation,” he continued.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
She’s now a naturalised (check London Gazette) British subject living in London.
Director/Co. Sec name: VALERIE ZELPHA HELEN SARRUF
Address (partial): W2 1SY
Loook at the light on the haor of Malcom x and the woman he is next to, then look at the light on the two men stage left and right.Compare that difference. This can’t be a genuine photo, whether authenticated or not.If you look at the photo immediately preceding that one, you will see a more pronounced difference.
The leftist black power nationalists have been up to this for years. The original image may have been authentic, but this one is not, the background and the figures are from different photos IMHO.
BTW, I love your photos, but this one is surreal.
Look at the light on the hair of Malcom x and the hair of the woman woman he is next to, then look at the light on the two men stage left and right.Compare that difference. This can’t be a genuine photo, whether authenticated or not.If you look at the photo immediately preceding that one, you will see a more pronounced difference.
The leftist black power nationalists have been up to this for years. The original image may have been authentic, but this one is not, the background and the figures are from different photos IMHO.
BTW, I love your photos, but this one is surreal.
I don’t think they had photoshop 50 years ago.
OFFICIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Thanks. We have it. I doubt he was really looking for her, the intention may have been to see if anyone from the family overseas was still alive who remembers.
She would not have been hard to find.
To remove the watermark, sign in or register.
(Some images may still show a watermark. Images may not be used without a license.)
COPYRIGHT IMAGE LINK
Malcolm X And Eric Abrahams At Oxford In 1964
Caption: UNITED KINGDOM - DECEMBER 05: MALCOLM X (left), leader of the Organization of Afro-American Unity and member of the BLACK MUSLIMS, is pictured with Eric ABRAHAMS, President of the Oxford Union, after a Press Conference in Oxford, England. (Photo by Keystone-France/Gamma-Keystone via Getty Images)
That is, there is absolutely no indication that what Team Obama's lawyer received from the Hawaiian authorities bears any resemblance to that which the WH Web site released to the world.
What is obvious is that Team Obama took various bits and pieces from the documentation given to them, and recast it as a Birth Certificate. No amount of careful parsing by the Hawaiian or the Obama-ites can quite cover the gap. E.G., "...content agrees with data on file in Hawaii" ... etc. ad nauseam.
Of course, there is no certified copy of a BC because there is no BC to begin with. What there is, is that none-too-artful-creation by Team Obama. Sheriff Joe has the goods. But, so what? There is nowhere to bring them. Ditto,the phony SS# and Selective Service Registration.
Also, it seems insane to me that no one inquires as to the circumstances of Obama's resignation from the Illinois Bar after trying exactly one case. We do know that on his original application, which was on public view for a long while on the Illinois Bar Association site (no longer), that he falsely denied ever using another name, neglected to mention drug use, traffic violations, etc. Apparently, opposing attorneys challenged his credentials and he was offered the opportunity to resign rather than face discipline (which is a very common Bar tactic). Mrs. Obama was ordered struck from the Bar for fraud in an insurance case. Oddly enough, since this was caused by ignorance of client's false testimony, she, (though a complete legal lightweight, actually has far more law-office experience than her husband), actually has IMO, a better chance of reinstatement!
Neither of them is an honest-to-God lawyer by any stretch of the imagination and wisely were never trusted to independently handle substantial cases by their firm.
That is, there is absolutely no indication that what Team Obama's lawyer received from the Hawaiian authorities bears any resemblance to that which the WH Web site released to the world.
What is obvious is that Team Obama took various bits and pieces from the documentation given to them, and recast it as a Birth Certificate. No amount of careful parsing by the Hawaiian or the Obama-ites can quite cover the gap. E.G., "...content agrees with data on file in Hawaii" ... etc. ad nauseam.
Of course, there is no certified copy of a BC because there is no BC to begin with. What there is, is that none-too-artful-creation by Team Obama. Sheriff Joe has the goods. But, so what? There is nowhere to bring them. Ditto,the phony SS# and Selective Service Registration.
Also, it seems insane to me that no one inquires as to the circumstances of Obama's resignation from the Illinois Bar after trying exactly one case. We do know that on his original application, which was on public view for a long while on the Illinois Bar Association site (no longer), that he falsely denied ever using another name, neglected to mention drug use, traffic violations, etc. Apparently, opposing attorneys challenged his credentials and he was offered the opportunity to resign rather than face discipline (which is a very common Bar tactic). Mrs. Obama was ordered struck from the Bar for fraud in an insurance case. Oddly enough, since this was caused by ignorance of client's false testimony, she, (though a complete legal lightweight, actually has far more law-office experience than her husband), actually has IMO, a better chance of reinstatement!
Neither of them is an honest-to-God lawyer by any stretch of the imagination and wisely were never trusted to independently handle substantial cases by their firm.
It is an axiom that “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” But this case sure tests this to the limit!
It is still possible that the cover-up is not to hide a nonexistent BC but rather a BC that has some unknown information on it that is severely damaging to Obama’s eligibility or narrative.
I am strongly inclined towards the nonexistent BC probability.
Why did Zullo write this affidavit?
what the heck is the sheriffs department going to do about this?
I'm leaving that question open. I'm not into prophecy, although I have no objection to those who do believe. Imo, the Original Testament belongs to the people of the Exile and what you read comprises their legends and history. The predictions contained within it are past tense.
There will always be evil men who fill a void, and islam, being parasitic, has discovered our weaknesses and chosen leaders. They are a temporary affliction as all men are because they not immortal. Ours is waiting in the wings somewhere and hasn't revealed him/herself, but I hope they will - and soon.
“It is not clear what legal venue this affidavit is designed to be filed in, or what motion it would support. It points to some kind of corruption charge against the State of Hawaii and its officials, which might be some kind of federal case, if Holder could be evaded.”
RICO? IANAL, but if numerous state governors can be sent to the slammer for corruption...wouldn't aiding and abetting document fraud for an illegitimate president constitute major state corruption? The problem is the getting the semi-independent FBI to look at it...semi-independently, as in resisting interference from Holder.
Arpaio has deep contacts inside the federal bureaucracy. I believe he was told to stand down in the hope that Barry would be defeated at the polls. Since that didn't happen, the effort to remove him can go forward to the extent it can.
Check out the photo, what do you think? I have no doubt X was at a debate, I just think the photo had been altered. I do not know why adjustments were made.
You know I can’t post the copyright image:
The caption reads:
Title: Malcolm X In Oxford
Caption: Black Nationalist leader and Nation of Islam spokesman Malcolm X in Oxford with Eric Abrahams, right, the Student Union president, before addressing university students on the subject of extremism and liberty, 3rd December 1964. (Photo by Keystone/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)
Date created: 02 Dec 1964
The caption tells you he is with Eric Abrahams, the Student Union President who hosted MX at the debate, which they are photographed leaving with an unidentified man and a young woman. And you want me to tell you what it is that has been ‘adjusted’ in the image?
Maybe it would be more simple if you were to explain what it is that makes you believe that the copyrighted Getty image is a fake? He was there evidently, Abrahams was his host, evidently, the young woman turns out to have been a student of Shakespeare (he quoted a passage from Hamlet during his speech, so perhaps you could call her his ENGLISH LITERATURE COACH?) and the unidentified man I have no idea who he might be.
I’m wondering now if it bothers you that he’s with a young woman who is very obviously a white girl. It might be of interest to remember that MX didn’t consider arabs to be white.
He said, when speaking of the Bandung Conference attendees in Indonesia in 1955, that there were no white people at the conference.
Heaven knows how the arab contingent felt about that. Even the Mufti of Jerusalem who was also there, might have felt somewhat miffed.
You remember the mufti? MX said he was a charming, cultured man. Regardless of his close association with Herr Hitler.
obumpa
Is that Val in the Oxford Uni pic?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.