Benghazi Betrayal May be a Cover-Up of American Weapons in Hands of Terrorists

Townhall.com ^ | November 17, 2012 | Rachel Alexander

[Carry_Okie]

It is now known that the American consulate in Benghazi alerted the White House several hours prior to the attack that they feared one was eminent.

Uh, methinks that would be "imminent." The author needs to brush up on his vocabulary.

Not a word about weapons going to Syria, the ongoing operation in Zero's reconfiguration of the Middle East into a unified nation dedicated to destroying Israel.

As if Stevens was going to buy all those weapons and just sit on them. Incredible.

[DoughtyOne]

I do wonder if this all boils down to Obama being embarrassed that he gave away 20,000 shoulder fired weapons to take down aircraft?

If he was moving part or all of those to Syria, the stink would be global. Europe would be furious.

That unified nation works with my take on things. I’ve been addressing it as a United States of Iran, but I have seen at least one talking head reference it as a United States of Islam.

Either way it’s chilling, because Israel would indeed be their unified focus.

Then they’d fall back on each other again.

[thouworm]

We refuse to look evil in the eye and call it what it is...because it’s OUR government right or wrong.

Until, perhaps, "we" begin to see that "our government's" foreign policy is not very different from "our government's" domestic policy. Maybe then "we" will wake up....or not.

[Uncle Miltie]

"American weapons had been given to Libyan terrorists"

That's been my (and others') speculation since mid-September.

Why the big cover-up? The only logical explanation large enough to cover the malfeasance is that the horrible thing being covered up is so huge, that the 0bama Administration would fall if it became known.

The only thing that big is 0bama supplying Al Qaeda.

I'm sticking with that hypothesis until better facts arrive.

[timestax]

[upchuck]

Perfect! :)