To: SWAMPSNIPER
Obama’s plan to circumvent the Constitution of the United States is an Impeachable Offense. It will give the UN, Useless Nations, the right to control our right to possess arms. The mere suggestion of this makes my blood boil.
The !~!@#$^ bastard swore to defend our constitution, not dilute it.
2 posted on
11/20/2012 2:51:28 PM PST by
BatGuano
(You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Treaties must be ratified. The President cannot enter into any treaty all by his dictatorial little self.
3 posted on
11/20/2012 2:53:54 PM PST by
GingisK
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Is there some hope that the Senate won't rubber stamp and approve it? Obama seems to ignore any resolutions or letters from the republicans in congress, so I believe the ‘strongly worded’ resolution is a waste of time, but is there enough sane democrats left in the Senate to link up with the minority republicans any kill the bill?
To: SWAMPSNIPER
...if Obama does sign it, the government should not spend any time or money on implementation until even if the Senate approves it.
The House decides the money right?
They should NOT allow any money for this. Make the dem Senate override that decision.
5 posted on
11/20/2012 3:01:47 PM PST by
Syncro
(The Tea Party is Dead-->MSM/Dems/GOP-e -- LONG LIVE THE TEA PARTY!)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Reject it? Hell, he probably WROTE it!
6 posted on
11/20/2012 3:05:07 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Why is the government more concerned about protecting a microbe on Mars than an unborn baby here?)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Remember!?!?!?! This is mostly the same house and senate members that passed the NDAA (lock em up by command of the president without charge, without access to counsel and indefinitely). Don’t worry, just sit back and accept the fact there is no longer a Constitution so accept that the majority of supposedly elected traitors in DC will WITHOUT A DOUBT allow the US to adopt this UN treaty. Most politicians denigrate the Tea Party folks because they are scared to death of us thus they must disarm us. Once this treaty is passed we can all respond in an appropriate fashion as the obozo, Holder, Hitlery and it, it goes by Janet Nipolitano, attempt to confiscate our firearms.
9 posted on
11/20/2012 3:27:17 PM PST by
drypowder
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Adopting it and enforcing it are to different issues.
This is not Britain or Australia.
10 posted on
11/20/2012 3:36:01 PM PST by
Venturer
To: SWAMPSNIPER
11 posted on
11/20/2012 4:02:21 PM PST by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
By the way, just another tooth in the gear of:
AGENDA 21
To: SWAMPSNIPER
A government that would try to implement this treaty in America would prove beyond all doubt that they mean to invoke an insurrection, with the intent to establish a dictatorship after squashing it.
15 posted on
11/20/2012 4:23:02 PM PST by
dagogo redux
(A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
reject it? good luck with that
it’s one of his many goals for the next 4 yrs
wait until he gets a breathless call with Putin....
19 posted on
11/20/2012 5:55:59 PM PST by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
I think the House members are just sending a shot over Barry’s bow. There are not 67 votes in the Senate for this POS. If politicians know how to do one thing it is stick thdeir finger in the wind. There is no desire for gun control in this country. It would kick off CWII.
21 posted on
11/20/2012 6:59:51 PM PST by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
33 posted on
12/04/2012 5:52:56 PM PST by
CodeToad
(Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
34 posted on
12/04/2012 5:53:10 PM PST by
CodeToad
(Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson