Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY
Let's see, the Obama Admin removed any reference to solid intel that terrorists and specifically an al-Qaeda-allied group was involved.
While inserting a false narrative about a protest that was not supported by real-time video intel that the Admin had access to.
But there was no intent to mislead.
The whoppers keep getting bigger and bigger.
2 posted on
11/27/2012 10:37:13 AM PST by
dirtboy
To: Free ThinkerNY
In a sane country both she and her boss would be out of a job and known by all as “liars.”
To: Free ThinkerNY
It doesn’t help that you are a Communist Muslim-lover, either, Susan. Just the sort of person that Obama would appoint to the UN. That’s bad enough.
4 posted on
11/27/2012 10:44:04 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Free ThinkerNY
“Note that my lips are moving,” said Rice.
To: Free ThinkerNY
You would think the trash that occupy this administration would stop at the first lie and make it official.
They know that most people with a brain know they are lying, so why continue? Nobody will do anything about it anyway.
6 posted on
11/27/2012 10:46:44 AM PST by
dforest
To: Free ThinkerNY
Every damned thing the administration says is intended to deceive!
7 posted on
11/27/2012 10:48:09 AM PST by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment,a Matter of Fact,Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: Free ThinkerNY
To: Free ThinkerNY
“as our assessments evolved” - Interesting.
Exactly who’s assessments?
Evolved? Huh - changed? to who’s benefit?
9 posted on
11/27/2012 10:52:07 AM PST by
fivecatsandadog
(Reality ruins everything.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations and liar Susan Rice said...
10 posted on
11/27/2012 10:52:24 AM PST by
DoughtyOne
(Hurricane Sandy..., a week later and 48 million Americans still didn't have power.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
"Neither I nor anyone else in the administration intended to mislead""""...............
Whatever they say, means just the opposite......., until they are caught, then it means something else.....
To: Free ThinkerNY
12 posted on
11/27/2012 10:55:09 AM PST by
Brandonmark
(OWCM is The new American Minority!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
“We intentionally made statements that were demonstrably untrue, be we didn’t intend to mislead you.”
Sounds like “depends on what your definition of is is” redux.
13 posted on
11/27/2012 11:01:37 AM PST by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Wonder if I can use this blase attitude the next time I deal with the .gov, IRS, LEOs, etc ?
F all ya’lls
16 posted on
11/27/2012 11:21:20 AM PST by
ßuddaßudd
(>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
To: Free ThinkerNY
What a joke....It was 9-11 and Muzzies love anniversaries. They picked a KNOWN site with no security.
They blamed the video FOR WEEKS. It was deliberate and intended to deceive.
To: Free ThinkerNY
Yeah right. Don’t be fooled by this.
18 posted on
11/27/2012 11:22:26 AM PST by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Free ThinkerNY
To this criminal regime, lying is like breathing!! They are the lyingest, liars I have ever seen. That is no lie!
19 posted on
11/27/2012 11:27:22 AM PST by
Batman11
(We came for the chicken sandwiches and a Sweet Tea Party broke out!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
20 posted on
11/27/2012 11:28:08 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Gee Rice said she did not intend to mislead the public about the September 11th attacks on the Benghazi consulate just read White House talking points she knew to be false. That out does Clinton’s famous what is the meaning of “is”.
To: Free ThinkerNY
So if it wasn’t intentional, then it must have been incompetence.
22 posted on
11/27/2012 11:40:23 AM PST by
Jack of all Trades
(Hold your face to the light, even though for the moment you do not see.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
“I didn’t intend to mislead”
There’s a pile of evidence that says you did, Ms. Rice. The evidence says that you intended to mislead and you knew you weren’t telling the truth. Did you think you could get away with it?
We hear that you are an exceptionally savvy person. You’d have to be very dumb to believe “I didn’t intend to mislead”, or “I gave you the best available intelligence”. I don’t think you’re dumb. You must have thought it “smart” to lie. We’ve got people digging hard to find out why you chose to lie.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson