If Romney helps, in any way, and the fiscal cliff happens, then Romney and the Republicans will be blamed for the whole thing.
Either way, Romney would be wise to stay home.
Posted on 11/28/2012 8:21:04 AM PST by Timber Rattler
Yeah.
He should tell Obama that he has to wash his hair AND organize his sock drawer that day.
Who says we wanted either of them?
Quote us pal.
FACT: RNC rules stated that before a certain date, no state could be “Winner take all”.
What happened in Florida?
Well.. They gave the state, against their own rules, to Romney.
Did the same with other states too.
Whether or not we wanted him, the RNC decided for us “for our own good” who our candidate was going to be.
We got who the media and the RNC wanted.
Yep
Love your tag line, I still have some mormon family who think Romney will fulfill the WHP by helping obama.
I know big eye roll, there.
The title wording is weird:
“White House: Obama to meet Romney Thursday”
Shouldn’t it be:
“White House: Romney to meet Obama Thursday”
The original title implies obama is the one who will travel to meet with Romney at the White House.
Obama is going to thank Romney for not bringing up the bc forgey; not bringing up the fact that his bio stated he was born in Kenya; and for not mentioning that he gave the stand down order that allowed the US Ambassador to be sodomized and murdered.
He wants to thank him for be for being a swell loser and not riling the peasants into an uproar.
Good cop/Bad cop. Without an imaginary boogie man on the other side, the "team" would never be able to sneak their anti-citizen agenda through.
It's all a distraction. While we're busy hating each other, the "team" works behind the scenes to solidify their own luxurious lifestyles and unlimited power.
A pauper goes to Washington to work for "us" - and retires an untouchable multimillionaire (regardless of his/her party affiliation).
Romney governed, not ruled.
Government healthcare at a state level is something completely different than at a federal level, or do you disagree with a federalist model?
Romney governed in a liberal state. That would require some compromises. It’s called governing.
What Obama does, that’s ruling. You seem to be comfortable with Obama’s construct?
I don’t think Romney was perfect, but I thought he was good. And to not support Romney in the last election is to implicitly support Obama.
The 22nd isn’t really in danger, as long as the GOP keeps the House, (and it will).
Nothing good can come from this.
Are you saying that Romney lied and cheated his way to the Republican nomination?
Are you saying he spent millions of dollars to destroy conservative candidates by out right lies and distortions of their records?
Are you saying that these actions were bolstered by liberal Republicans, the GOPe and people yelling and chanting it didn’t matter because ‘he was the only guy who could beat obama’?
nah, Can’t be.
/s/
Many of us did indeed vote for the Rino despite our misgivings.
It didn’t matter.
We got Tammany Hall’ed in this election.
By both sides.
Yes.
That is exactly what happened.
And then, using the Ron Paul idiots as an excuse, they changed the rules to eliminate the voice of we the people because we bother them.
Why, how plebian of us.
We got Tammany Hall’ed in this election.
By both sides.
************************
The two parties are not opponents. They are accomplices.
Not true. I found Romney and his history to be completely repulsive. The man is nothing short of a snake in the grass. I voted, but not FOR Romney. I just voted against the other guy - the snake with the bigger fangs.
Obama wants to hold Romney up for something or he wouldn’t invite him.
However, if he thinks that Romney has any influence on the TEA Party Republicans in the House, he is barking up the wrong tree.
Ok, sugar whatever you want to think.
(I have enjoyed however the people who excuse Romney’s inability to govern because he was in a liberal state....totally ignoring that fact he ran for governor there because he could only win in a liberal state.)
To not support Romney was to not support Romney.
To not support obama was not to support obama.
That dance tune is not only warn out, it is ignorant.
Just to ease your mind however, I live in California unless my puny one voted counted as five million obama still won this state.
Romney lost because he was a lousy candidate and a liberal one to boot.
Lemme see . . could it possibly be . . appoint Romney Sec. of Business, ignore most of his advice, trot him out for photo ops, then in a few years, load ALL the blame for Obama’s failed “policies” on Romney and the Republicans’ backs? Hmm..mm, sounds like a plan to me; the usual Dhimmicrat plan . .
Gotta love that acronym. It's right up there with "Win The Future."
If that isn’t apparent to everyone at the moment, nobody can help them to see it.
Why does anyone think the RNC keeps trying to run candidates to the left of the Dem opponent?
The RNC won elections by running candidates that were obviously different from the Dem.
NOW we have these idiot strategists who think they have to ‘reach out to the left’ and run candidates that are liberals.
And they cannot understand why their candidate loses.
So they run progressively further left candidates.
Anyone want to take the bet that the next candidate they try and foist on us will be a huge Rino?
Anyone?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.