Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

POLL: Americans Favor Legalization of Marijuana 51-44%
CNSNews.com ^ | December 5, 2012 | Gregory Gwyn-Williams Jr.

Posted on 12/05/2012 6:45:57 AM PST by CNSNews.com

Americans favor the legalization of marijuana 51 to 44 percent, according to a new Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday morning.

The poll showed a substantial gender and age gap on the issue:

-- Men favored legalization 59 to 36 percent, but women opposed it, 52 to 44 percent.

-- Americans 18 to 29 years old support legalization 67 to 29 percent, while those over 65 years oppose it, 56 to 35 percent.

-- Respondents between 30 and 44 years old also support the idea of legalization, 58 to 39 percent, while Americans between 45 and 64 are more closely divided, 48 to 47 percent.

The poll noted that the racial split evident in American politics is “barely noticeable” on this question, as 50 percent of white voters and 57 percent of black voters favor legalization.

Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, said of the data:

"With the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes legal in about 20 states, and Washington and Colorado voting this November to legalize the drug for recreational use, American voters seem to have a more favorable opinion about this once-dreaded drug."

Brown believes the legalization of marijuana in the U.S. is inevitable: “It seems likely…given the better than 2-1 majority among younger voters, legalization is just a matter of time.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; marijuana; potheads; trends
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: CNSNews.com
Interesting times.

The federal governemnt has no enumerated power that would enable them to either criminalize or legalize marijuana. To borrow from Clarence Thomas, they've "appropriated state police powers under the guise of regulating commerce", but they hold no legitimate authority by an "original intent" reading of the Commerce Clause. Having usurped the power from the states, they proceeded to delegate it to the UN by treaty, and now they claim it's out of their hands and they can't do anything about it.

21 posted on 12/05/2012 7:43:04 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

Over the course of several years in the program (AA), I’ve accepted all responsibilities for my behaviors and consequences for my actions. I don’t blame pot for who I became after college, I blame myself for not being adult enough to give it up.


22 posted on 12/05/2012 7:43:18 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
It will never happen.

There is too much power for government in the War on Some Drugs.

No government, especially totalitarian socialist governments, ever voluntarily relinquish a shred of power.

23 posted on 12/05/2012 7:46:44 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state." - Cornelius Tacitus, Roman Senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
There is no Federal Art 1 Sec 8 power to run a "drug war".

End the DEA and let the State's write their own "drug" laws.

24 posted on 12/05/2012 7:48:17 AM PST by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: showme_the_Glory

This thread reminds me of my friend’s son who has been out of college nearly 2 years with huge student debt and no prospects for a real job.

Despite this he cast his vote for Gary Johnson. And he said that the fact Colorado decriminalized pot was the most significant thing to happen on Election Day.


25 posted on 12/05/2012 7:48:17 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
Exactly.

I should state that I'm one of a very few people I know (of my generation) who haven't tried pot. When I was in college, it just never appealed to me. And now that I'm working and supporting a family, I've got more important things to think about than foolishness like that. :-)

Personally, I am *not* in favor of legalizing pot (or any other illegal drugs). I think that if something is "legal", then more people will use it - or use it more regularly - than would have normally. The populace is already over-doped, we don't need to pile on more drugs.

But to not study something that is clearly known to help.....To not prescibe (and monitor) a drug that has known benefits....to me, seems foolish.

26 posted on 12/05/2012 7:51:46 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

How is Prohibition not relevant?

How is it that pretty much everyone knows a lot more people who have had their lives ruined by alcohol than by marijuana not relevant?

And speaking of “Old BS” that’s routinely trotted out, no, I’ve never tried marijuana in my life, or any other controlled substance (being Eastern European my dad would give me a little glass of beer from time to time from about the age of 8 on up.)

Though people will never admit it the real main reason people oppose marijuana legalization on FR is that they perceive it would give satisfaction to people they don’t like (”hippies”).


27 posted on 12/05/2012 7:53:39 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
What is the moral argument for pot being illegal (when alcohol is legal)?

I think I can make a more compelling argument that the "War on Drugs" has been vastly more immoral then letting adults smoke pot.

28 posted on 12/05/2012 7:54:13 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
You can have a society that says "drugs are not OK", but which does not launch no-knock raids by quasi-military forces against the wrong house, in the middle of the night.

You can have a society that says "drugs are not OK", but which does not confiscate a man's real estate because unbeknownst to him, someone lit up a joint in one of its rooms.

29 posted on 12/05/2012 7:54:45 AM PST by Notary Sojac (Only liberals believe that people can be made virtuous via legislative enactment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

As a former Prosecutor, absolutely legalize it. Alcohol is legal (a big argument n favor) and we wasted way too much time on minor pot cases. The overwhelming number of people smoke it responsible like people who drink.

Keeping pot illegal is an utter waste of resources AND ... it should be up to the States not the Feds. O’dimwit should stop raiding pot dispensaries in States that have legalized it.


30 posted on 12/05/2012 7:58:02 AM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
You know, we haven't been able to stop drug traffic inside maximum security prisons.

What makes you think we can stop it in a free country??

31 posted on 12/05/2012 7:58:34 AM PST by Notary Sojac (Only liberals believe that people can be made virtuous via legislative enactment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

Well, the path to conservative success is clear. The GOP should hold to the rest of its principles, but become the party of MJ legalization.


32 posted on 12/05/2012 7:59:37 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

As a former Prosecutor, absolutely legalize it. Alcohol is legal (a big argument n favor) and we wasted way too much time on minor pot cases. The overwhelming number of people smoke it responsible like people who drink.

Keeping pot illegal is an utter waste of resources AND ... it should be up to the States not the Feds. O’dimwit should stop raiding pot dispensaries in States that have legalized it.”

Legalizing would also get the armed illegal alien Mexican drug cartel criminals who grow thousands of acres of it out of my neighborhood!


33 posted on 12/05/2012 8:00:37 AM PST by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

Within 5 years marijuana will be widely legalized just as gay marriage will be institutionalized and widespread. Today’s tobacco companies will be growing and processing pot which will be heavily taxed. The progressives will then be demanding legalization of heroin, meth, and consensual sexual relations between adults and children as well as adults and animals.

Fast forward 30 years. Progressive ambulance chaser lawyers will be filing class action suits against the pot/tobacco companies demanding big settlements for throat cancer caused by smoking weed or brain damage caused by dependence on pot. They’ll also be suing the Boy Scouts to allow consensual sex between troop leaders and scouts during campouts.

The envelope will keep getting pushed until we have anarchy and total destruction of the social fabric. From there civilization will have to rebuild.


34 posted on 12/05/2012 8:01:42 AM PST by Soul of the South
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac; jpsb
My long-standing position is as follows:

1) A Police State is a bad thing. Our war on drugs is prosecuted badly. I do not like quasi-military forces kicking in doors. I do not support property seizures. These are bad attempts to enforce a law.

2) I would support legalization of drugs -- but only after Government charity is ended. If you can be responsible and support yourself AND take drugs, then it is none of my business. BUT the current situation is that a lot of feckless people get in trouble with substance abuse -- and they use MY money to survive. I will support legalization AFTER people become free to die in alleys due to their bad decisions. Until we live in such a free country, I think making drugs illegal isn't so bad.

35 posted on 12/05/2012 8:02:31 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Republicans have made themselves useless, toothless, and clueless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South
Yup. The Left always seems to look 30 years ahead. They play a long game and they have their eye on where they want to get to. Conservatives don't do that nearly as well. Looking 30 years ahead and asking "Where will we be?" is smart.

Too many people say "The case load at the county courthouse would be easier next month if we stopped prosecuting people for drugs". That sort of short-sighted thinking is why we're in a mess. We give in and give in and give in on all of our principles (moral society being a key principle) and then we get upset that everything is in decline.

36 posted on 12/05/2012 8:07:20 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Republicans have made themselves useless, toothless, and clueless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Ok, thanks, I’ll respond later, but would like to point out that some states are trying to drug test recipients of state funds. So things are moving in your direction. I just do not like the tremendous power gov derived by the war on drugs and see that as a much greater evil then hippies smoking pot.


37 posted on 12/05/2012 8:09:35 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

The majority of people and interest groups who think legalized pot is a great idea are also the very same self righteous citizens who go berserk over anyone lightng up a cigarette.

That usually includes not only liberals, who always want more government, but also those who think they are conservative but side with liberals in advocating more government control when someone engages in a legal practice they do not like.


38 posted on 12/05/2012 8:16:39 AM PST by Iron Munro (Big Moo & Bronco 'Bama = Robbing From The Hood and Boy Blunder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

“In reality, freedom has its costs. But a police state is more costly.”

Legalizing drugs (even heroin and cocaine) isn’t going to reduce the “police state” now, or ever.

That’s here to stay, short of a revolution or “civil separation” of the states.


39 posted on 12/05/2012 8:31:50 AM PST by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wbill

I’m probably the only person you’ll ever meet, who went to the original Woodstock festival in 1969, and didn’t get high OR drunk...


40 posted on 12/05/2012 8:34:07 AM PST by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson