I sent you my resume.
You liked what you read.
I came in today for the face-to-face interview.
And now, all of a sudden; I'm not Qualified!!!???
You hateful bigot!!!!
Posted on 12/06/2012 3:55:45 AM PST by Kaslin
Last week, I was exiting my neighborhood Starbucks when I happened to overhear a middle-aged man talking to a younger man who appeared to be his son.
"It matters what you wear," the older man told the younger, whose clothes reflected a cross of grunge and goth. "When you go out with your friends on the weekend, you can dress one way; when you are going to a job, it matters what you wear."
While many might argue that appearance should not matter, we know in reality that it does. Expectations vary by subculture. What is acceptable for a musician may not work in an investment-banking firm on Wall Street. But the buttoned-up, investment-banking look might not go over well in an art deco environment.
Appearance matters in politics, too. Not simply personal appearance, but the appearance of the party and the organization itself. Is it homogeneous and reflective of a bygone era, or does it represent the heterogeneity of the American population?
Last week, my column, "If No One Goes with You, You Cannot Win," concluded: "Republicans need to communicate a compelling vision in order to win the hearts, minds and votes of the American people. This vision needs to be inviting to others, not off-putting or offensive.
"This vision would provide a framework for the tactics. Will others want to follow us? Only if the party offers a compelling vision, one that is inclusive and inviting. At every possible point, the question should be: Are we articulating a vision that people will hear and respond to?
"In the end, it's not enough to have the right policies or the right moral values. It comes down to who wants to go with you. If no one goes with you, you cannot win."
In speeches on Tuesday at the Kemp Foundation Leadership Award Dinner in Washington, D.C., Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., offered a compelling vision for the party, one that is inclusive and inviting.
I'd like to think that my column inspired them both, but I'll accept the explanation that great minds think alike.
Limit the size of government, grow the middle class and ensure opportunity for all were the themes of the night.
Ryan briefly mentioned the recent campaign but rapidly moved on. "For all of us, the work goes on," he said. "We must carry on and keep fighting for the American Idea - the belief that everyone should have the opportunity to rise ... to escape from poverty ... and to achieve whatever your God-given talents and hard work enable you to achieve."
Articulating the Republican vision is an area where Ryan sees opportunity for improvement: "We have a compassionate vision based on ideas that work - but sometimes we don't do a good job of laying out that vision," he said. "We need to do better."
He urged the party to focus on what brings Americans together rather than on what divides them. "We must speak to the aspirations and anxieties of every American. I believe we can turn the engines of upward mobility back on, so that no one is left out from the promise of America."
Rubio talked about the middle class and the role of government. "Government has a role to play. And we must make sure it does its part. But it's a supporting role: to help create the conditions that enable prosperity in our private economy. ... It is not the ever-expanding reach of government, but rather having access to the benefits of (a) thriving economy that allows the poor to rise into the middle class. Not by making rich people poorer, but by making poor people richer."
"To do that we need a limited and effective government," Rubio continued. "...Big government has never worked. The promise of more government as the answer to all our problems is easy to sell. But when it is put in practice, it fails every time. Big government has never been able to create and sustain a vibrant and stable middle class."
In addition to articulating a compelling, inclusive vision, the Republican Party has to come to grips with the reality that appearances matter. Reach out to women, Latinos and Asians and include them so that others can easily see that Republicans do more than talk about opportunity for all; they practice it.
Republicans already proclaim the obvious fact that their policies are more friendly than Democrats’ to “everybody.” They do so until they are blue in the face.
Republicans would have carried the last election handsomely had the set of Americans that passively polled in favor of them showed up in at least equal proportion at the polls as did the bums that the Democrats scared up from sea to shining sea.
And anyhow, what Republican goes out wearing “grunge and goth”? Except maybe Ted Nugent....
Maybe more should. And declare to the young-uns that elephants are cooler than donkeys. It couldn’t make things any WORSE.
Good point. Perhaps it makes it better
what Republican goes out wearing “grunge and goth”? Except maybe Ted Nugent....
Ted has done more than most people to try to keep our freedoms and decency of life. He doesn’t wear grunge...he wears hunting clothes.
When a-hunting he does go... I thought he gave heavy metal concerts too?
I think one of our problems is our appearance as a party, that is, as she said, what people see. We have some great people - Ryan, Rubio, Gingrich pere himself (Jackie’s not a bad speaker, either), and a host of others - but then we have the old guard that either won’t let them reach our or is actively embarrassed by the message. So we don’t look very committed, and it seems that every time we elect even good people, the “old” GOP comes out and stifles them and they don’t accomplish anything.
During the last campaign, it was Ryan’s plan to go to lower-income urban areas - including black ones - and give them this message of opportunity, inclusion (that is, we’re all in this together and we all progress together) and hope. But Romney and the GOP campaign managers wouldn’t let him do it.
My only hope is that this most recent failure may have discredited the Romney-Old Guard component of the GOP or at any rate weakened them so severely that they won’t have the crushing influence they have had over the last several years.
Shame on Mitt for being too timid. Not that he had particularly bad plans for how he wanted to conduct a presidency, but selling it is more than half the battle.
In this case, it should read; “The REPUBLICANS will endure until the day DEMOCRATS discover that they can bribe the public with the public’s money.
I sent you my resume.
You liked what you read.
I came in today for the face-to-face interview.
And now, all of a sudden; I'm not Qualified!!!???
You hateful bigot!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.