Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catcher in the Rye dropped from US school curriculum [replaced with environmental propaganda]
telegraph.co.uk ^ | December 7, 2012

Posted on 12/07/2012 10:25:09 AM PST by grundle

American literature classics are to be replaced by insulation manuals and plant inventories in US classrooms by 2014.

A new school curriculum which will affect 46 out of 50 states will make it compulsory for at least 70 per cent of books studied to be non-fiction, in an effort to ready pupils for the workplace.

Books such as JD Salinger's Catcher in the Rye and Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird will be replaced by "informational texts" approved by the Common Core State Standards.

Suggested non-fiction texts include Recommended Levels of Insulation by the the US Environmental Protection Agency, and the Invasive Plant Inventory, by California's Invasive Plant Council.

The new educational standards have the backing of the influential National Governors' Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers, and are being part-funded by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Related Articles

Letters reveal the secret side of JD Salinger 27 Jan 2011

Why Harper Lee has remained silent 01 May 2011

JD Salinger 28 Jan 2010

Jamie Highfill, a teacher at Woodland Junior High School in Arkansas, told the Times that the directive was bad for a well-rounded education.

"I'm afraid we are taking out all imaginative reading and creativity in our English classes.

"In the end, education has to be about more than simply ensuring that kids can get a job. Isn't it supposed to be about making well-rounded citizens?"

Supporters of the directive argue that it will help pupils to develop the ability to write concisely and factually, which will be more useful in the workplace than a knowledge of Shakespeare.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: leftismoncampus; publicschools; purge; readinglist; salinger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: Resettozero

Salinger’s work is essentially conservative. It’s about individuals trying to recover from some past trauma and regain some dignity in their lives.


61 posted on 02/20/2014 9:09:40 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Borges
He whined about everything and did nothing. Holden committed the carnal sin of literature in that he was boring. He was the guy who corners you at a party and wearies you with the patter of little feats.

So when reading that novel keep in mind that the person was writing it while preparing for or recovering from D-Day (in which Salinger participated).

So?

No excuse for having your "hero" be a worthless whiner.

62 posted on 02/20/2014 11:08:14 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

He’s not supposed to be a completely sympathetic character. He also has signs of incipient schizophrenia.


63 posted on 02/20/2014 11:30:06 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Borges
He’s not supposed to be a completely sympathetic character

He was boring. He actually needed some problems in his life as he had none.

He also has signs of incipient schizophrenia.

He was a narcissist, not very intelligent and lacked a desire to learn. While it is possible to write a good story where the protagonist is all of these things this was not that story.

64 posted on 02/20/2014 12:02:10 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Boring is obviously subjective. He’s regarded as one of the most engaging characters in American Lit. Not unlike Huckleberry Finn (who’s problems were much more serious). The fact that he didn’t have any ‘real’ problems is part of the theme. It’s why he struggles. An early case of Affluenza.


65 posted on 02/20/2014 12:05:40 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Borges
He’s regarded as one of the most engaging characters in American Lit.

Probably by people who like being pretentious.

Not unlike Huckleberry Finn (who’s problems were much more serious)

Finn was actually doing something. Holden was not.

The fact that he didn’t have any ‘real’ problems is part of the theme. It’s why he struggles.

He is not struggling at all. He is enjoying being a self centered little snot.

An early case of Affluenza.

Is that a fancy way of saying he was boring?

Because he does not seem to be anything new, just your run of the mill bore.

66 posted on 02/20/2014 12:28:44 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

At the time his voice was completely new. The alienated urban adolescent. Hard to believe now because it’s so ingrained.


67 posted on 02/20/2014 1:37:31 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Borges
At the time his voice was completely new. The alienated urban adolescent.

Sure it was. Why every kid I knew growing up off Arthur Avenue, Flatbush, 3rd St and Avenue A, Roosevelt Avenue, and dem places in Brooklyn and Staten Island, dey all said, "Man, dis Holden guy, it's like he's living my life!"

68 posted on 02/20/2014 1:48:24 PM PST by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

The fact that he came from a blue blood privileged background added to the irony of his position.


69 posted on 02/20/2014 1:51:24 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Only if you use the term adolescent. Otherwise it is the same story since Rome and before. Boy mopes, whines and complains about nothing but never actually pulls on his sandals and tries to do anything constructive.

I know people like to think that they are cutting edge but I bet Og in his cave would have recognized Holden as that brat from downstream.

70 posted on 02/20/2014 3:47:28 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Borges
There is no irony in being a self centered rich brat.

It is cliche to say the least.

71 posted on 02/20/2014 3:49:32 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

The irony is that he’s upset even through he seems to have nothing to be upset about. It’s more than just a generation gap...it’s tied to a specific time and place and has been endlessly imitated.


72 posted on 02/20/2014 6:22:31 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson