Posted on 12/10/2012 5:50:12 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
Live LENR experiment being broadcast as we speak: http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/12/mfmp-to-launch-eu-test/
P&F received several million dollars in money and materials throughout the 1990's and they still couldn't exonerate themselves.
Yet you still can't provide the basic scientific details I asked for in post #85. You're all claims, no substance.
Not to you. If it’s worth doing, some other legitimate freeper will ask.
That’s less than 1/100th of 1%, not 10%.
The home team can then pick up the months ago punted ball,
***ETFOOM. I was posting LENR articles before Rossi came along, and I’ll be posting them after he leaves the scene.
That's a disingenuous way of stating it. Their type of research costs a lot less money, and they got free palladium. It was more than enough to exonerate themselves and attract more funding.
No, it was not more than enough, not even close to enough. But at least there is a small subset of facts we can agree on, which is that they did some research in the early 1990’s. Some of it is available here
http://lenr-canr.org/index/menu/menu.php
which, of course, you won’t be reading because you never read this stuff.
HONEST skepticism is certainly a requirement......but part of HONEST skepticism is a willingness to actually examine presented data. Pathological skeptics refuse to do so. How much study have YOU done of the science behind LENR??
Good luck.
You need to present better data in a better way. Neither you nor Kevmo help your cause. Plastering FR with blog posts isn't going to work. Quantity and insults are no replacement for quality.
Pathological skeptics refuse to do so.
"Pathological skeptics" is nothing more than an insult used to cover up your inability to make a professional and convincing case.
500-700 layers of nanoparticle lattice, and the other wire only had a few layers, and wasn't long enough. Ooo-kay. Try to provide others with enough of the right material to fully replicate results? Too much to ask? We keep running into problems like that, one after annother...
The excuse reminded me too much of Rossi, just more in-depth. The lattices are exciting, but results still seem ephemeral.
Instead of being insulted (you guys won't look) show us something other than pathological appearing, marginal science? Yeah ok, just a call-and-response sort of response from a choir member. I snuck in. I admit it.
Scientism is not a religion I recognize as truly valid. It's always been against the law in Missouri.
It's not our fault Rossi has all but been proved, beyond ANY shadow of doubt to be an absolute fraud. Simply that he's not in jail, is meaningless.
See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2968176/posts?page=1...
That’s how it’s done: just science ...no hype; no snark, no seagulls, no name-calling...
Excuse me, but WTF are you talking about?? I've spent the last year trying to get people to actually look at the available published data. Most that continue to post on these threads simply refuse to take that action.
1) Neither I nor Kevmo started the name-calling.
2) The title that you so dislike was the choice of the original author.
3) I don't read Krivit, because much of his content is behind a paywall.
4) "New Energy and Fuel" blogs owner is actually of the opinion that Rossi is a fraud.
5) The idea that I go around choosing specific blog articles because they are "hype" is simply ludicrous....I don't have the time to waste.
6) I first saw the info about the Mitsubishi work on "Ecat World", which I knew was anathema to a few, so picked the first source that is known specifically NOT to be a "Rossi pawn" (as some here think).
7) Iwamura's (sp?) work is not unique as to the quality of science presented....it is, in fact, completely TYPICAL of the rest of the research in CF. You would know this if you had done even a modicum of study of the issue. I still recommend Beaudette's book. In fact, I think Beaudette still lives in Massachusetts....assuming from your handle that you are still "up east", you can probably drive over an talk to him.
Nice of you to take the time to read my FRProfile... ;-)</SARC>
Is that what this is about?
It’s a translation from Japanese ~ please to insert tab B so gracious to tab A.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.