[TigersEye]

The libs couldn't wait for technology to find a marketable solution and wasted loads of time and money mandating CFLs and demonizing incandescent lights. Well, here it is, most likely. Cheaper to use than CFLs, better light quality, unbreakable, no mercury vapor risks and moldable to unlimited forms.

Where do we go to get that eco-wacko-wasted money back?

[DesertRhino]

If it ain’t 35 cents a bulb, it’s no improvement.

[Usagi_yo]

“field-induced” — sounds an awful like EM transmissions. I wonder what the Human race is going to look like 10,000 years from now. Will we be born ‘wired in’ with our own biological network receivers?

That is of course if we survive.

[VanShuyten]

Sounds good, but might not be intense enough to replace a 100 watt bulb.

[Red Badger]

So, these bulbs are ‘neverdim’?.........

[celmak]

Love the first comment in the article's website:

These filthy scientists are a threat to America's Light Bulb Freedom act.

If God wanted man to use Luciferian glowing devil sticks then he wouldn't have given the world the glory and beauty of the incandescent light. God's shining light.

Stop them while there is still freedom to be had.

[Cringing Negativism Network]

OK I see these are invented in America.

If production to replace the existing fluorescent bulbs is based in AMERICA, I’m all for this.

If it’s yet another scam to buy a bunch of imported bulbs, I say keep it unchanged.