Ha!
That’s right.
Rock stars, actors, sports people all ought to be taxed to the point of castration.
The only thing they can think of to do with their money is to buy drugs, anyway!
Very few of them actually support organizations for the disadvantaged and udnerserved.
Before Tiger Woods came along and trashed the golf scene, I used to say that golfers were the most generous and clean living of all the sports stars. They always were in the news giving huge checks to research organizations and to programs for kids... etc.
Now, all the sports types are crud... when will they get over themselves and do something good for sick kids or others at the bottom of the heap, who will never in their lives see the kind of income athletes get?
Start by taxing the ever-loving crap out of Hollywood. Ive suggested this before, and the esteemed Instapundit, Glenn Reynolds, was on the same wavelength last August when he suggested bringing back the 20 percent excise tax on motion picture gross revenue from the 1950s.The movie excise tax was imposed in response to the high deficits after World War Two, Reynolds recalled. Deficits are high again, and theres already historical precedent. Of course, to keep up with technology, the tax should now apply to DVDs, downloadable movies, pay-per-view and the like. But in these financially perilous times, why should movie stars and studio moguls, with their yachts, swimming pools and private jets, not at least shoulder the burden they carried back in Harry Trumans day when, to be honest, movies were better anyway.
As Reynolds noted, one side effect of such proposals is that it causes far-Left Hollywood types to suddenly begin babbling about the depressing effects of high tax rates upon economic growth, as though they had been suddenly possessed by the ghost of Milton Friedman. Thats fun even if the tax proposals end up getting defeated. Especially now that we have YouTube to disseminate and immortalize their panicked bursts of trickle-down economic wisdom.