I would presume they chose King James NOT for the reasons given, buy because they don’t have to worry about copyright infringement, like they would for many other more modern and accurate versions.
I love the circular logic of claiming the bible says “nothing” about homosexuality, and then editing verses that do so they no longer do, pretending they are simply “correcting” misinterpretation.
I wonder if that also tried to “fix” the many verses in the bible that make it clear that marriage is for a man and a woman.
***buy because they don’t have to worry about copyright infringement,***
How true, but in England the copyright is held by the CROWN.