Posted on 12/15/2012 5:02:27 AM PST by wesagain
Over the last four years, modern-day “Sons of Liberty” – such as Joseph Farah, WND, its prized investigative reporters such as Jerome Corsi and courageous lawmen like Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse – have worked tirelessly to have President Barack Hussein Obama thoroughly investigated over the issue of his place of birth.
It is well-known that Obama had for years refused to release his claimed Hawaiian birth certificate and other official documents that reflect on whether he was born in U.S. territory as he claims, or in Kenya where his father of the same name hailed. If born in Kenya or somewhere else outside of American territory, Obama would be ineligible to run for and serve as president. And, even if born in America, Obama does not qualify as a “natural born citizen” under our Constitution, since he was not, as also required under our law to be president, sired by two American citizen parents. Only his mother was an American at the time of his birth.
The author and readers of this column know this issue well; we have lived and agonized over it as the Republican Party – the so-called opposition to the racist/socialist Muslim who lied his way into the White House – proceeded to bring the nation to its financial, social and international knees, put its head in the sand and looked the other way for fear they would be vilified by the leftist mainstream media. Obama’s father, an anti-neo-colonialist, anti-American, anti-Semitic and anti-Christian Muslim featured in his son’s book “Dreams from my Father,” is smiling from his grave.
Now, this Republican Party, soundly beaten in the November elections and essentially politically a dead letter, has yet a new opportunity to resurrect itself and show......
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Larry Klayman demands GOP lawmakers challenge Electoral College tally!
These Republican representatives seem to have joined the Casper the Friendly Ghost Republican Caucus. They are out of the loop again.
Larry Klayman brings Don Quiote to mind.
Has he even slayed a windmill?
One has to give him “E” for effort, though.
What would be great is if EVERY single Republican challenged it for slightly different, but related reasons. That would be too big to ignore.
Challenging the eligibility of mr Obama will not do a damn thing to help anybody’s self esteem and will not help a single horny child exercise the the proper use of a condom, so whats the point.?
Never happen. It seems that except for a few honorable people, the rest are willing to just go along with the Obama is natural born fantasy. We are going to be doomed by the failure of out own party to stand up for the constitution.
There is a scarcity of honorable people in the Congress.
They are calld “The Honorable” Mr./Ms. so and so but their honor is tinged with a singular fear of making Barrack Hussein Obama fess up.
Never happen. It seems that except for a few honorable people, the rest are willing to just go along with the Obama is natural born fantasy. We are going to be doomed by the failure of out own party to stand up for the constitution.
Not just the GOP politicians...
Look at people like Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin, who have attacked “Birthers” and even referred to Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Posse as “similar to 9/11 truthers” (Malkin). And people idolize these Obama Supporters and Enablers
After all the evidence that has been presented and confirmed...if by now you are not an Obama “Birther”...you definitely will be an Obama Supporter and Enabler
The GOP Media (no they are not conservative) has spent more time attacking “Birthers” and not covering the Obama Eligibility issue
And, when Malkin, Coulter, and the Obama Enablers provide the real, official Hawaii Birth Certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, then I will apologize. i am tired of the in-house subversion....the “peeing in the tent”
Gotta agree that there aren’t enough cojones in place to do anything to hussein. As said before, you could have him on live doing something unspeakable and it looks like most of the country would turn a blind eye to it. Sadly, he isn’t going anywhere.
“Constitution? We don’t need no stinkin’ constitution.” Eli Wallach. (I think)
Helping keep mankind warm for 65 years.
The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)
Vattel, who, though not very full to this point, is more explicit and more satisfactory on it than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, says: “The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.
Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830)
Ann Scott was born in South Carolina before the American revolution, and her father adhered to the American cause and remained and was at his death a citizen of South Carolina. There is no dispute that his daughter Ann, at the time of the Revolution and afterwards, remained in South Carolina until December, 1782. Whether she was of age during this time does not appear. If she was, then her birth and residence might be deemed to constitute her by election a citizen of South Carolina. If she was not of age, then she might well be deemed under the circumstances of this case to hold the citizenship of her father, for children born in a country, continuing while under age in the family of the father, partake of his national character as a citizen of that country. Her citizenship, then, being prima facie established, and indeed this is admitted in the pleadings, has it ever been lost, or was it lost before the death of her father, so that the estate in question was, upon the descent cast, incapable of vesting in her? Upon the facts stated, it appears to us that it was not lost and that she was capable of taking it at the time of the descent cast.
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As society cannot perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their parents, and succeed to all their rights.' Again: 'I say, to be of the country, it is necessary to be born of a person who is a citizen; for if he be born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. . . .
Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.
Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939),
Was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a child born in the United States to naturalized parents on U.S. soil is a natural born citizen and that the child's natural born citizenship is not lost if the child is taken to and raised in the country of the parents' origin, provided that upon attaining the age of majority, the child elects to retain U.S. citizenship "and to return to the United States to assume its duties." Not only did the court rule that she did not lose her native born Citizenship but it upheld the lower courts decision that she is a "natural born Citizen of the United States" because she was born in the USA to two naturalized U.S. Citizens.
But the Secretary of State, according to the allegation of the bill of complaint, had refused to issue a passport to Miss Elg 'solely on the ground that she had lost her native born American citizenship.' The court below, properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with the defendants [307 U.S. 325, 350] (Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227 , 57 S.Ct. 461, 108 A.L.R. 1000), declared Miss Elg 'to be a natural born citizen of the United States' (99 F.2d 414) and we think that the decree should include the Secretary of State as well as the other defendants. The decree in that sense would in no way interfere with the exercise of the Secretary's discretion with respect to the issue of a passport but would simply preclude the denial of a passport on the sole ground that Miss Elg had lost her American citizenship."
The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.
I can think of at least 4 republicans in the house who have nothing to lose by standing up to challenge the usurper.
For future historians, it will be one of the supreme ironies of the entrire span of American life that the worst and most destructive president in a long list was never eligible to run for office in the first place.
Obozo’s past is totally conjured. FACT
In my humble opinion, FMD is the most likely biological father of the O-B__tard. And it is likely he was not born in the US. Probably in Canada.
It is also possible that he is totally foreign born and bred.
Excellent post.....excellent! Now let’s get rid of him and then charge him with treason!
Across America there are many twisted minds right this very minute planning revenge for the election of Obama, they cannot penetrate Obamas security screen so they will seek out softer targets.
In the end this is going nowhere.
I fear our republic is already lost.
sfl
What part of "not eligible" do those in the anti-birther crowd fail to comprehend?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.