Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/15/2012 8:53:00 PM PST by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Para-Ord.45
The "high earners" are high earners because they don't spend every cent they come by on Escalades and bling.

The "high earners" invest their money and create SUSTAINABLE JOBS for other people.

Government does not create sustainable jobs, because government does not do anything at a profit.

Only companies that earn profit pay taxes and pay wages to employees who pay taxes on their wages.

Without investment, there is no profit, and without profit there are no taxes or jobs.

2 posted on 12/15/2012 8:57:33 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state." - Cornelius Tacitus, Roman Senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

>> because of the sensitivity of the negotiations.

Hogwash.


3 posted on 12/15/2012 8:59:37 PM PST by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45
Photobucket
6 posted on 12/15/2012 9:12:04 PM PST by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

Barry knows his way around a Boehner. He’ll get his 250 grand.


7 posted on 12/15/2012 9:13:20 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (It's not about the guns. It's about the control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

He’s getting #%*$ed. He’s giving in on tax hikes for the wealthy to prevent tax hikes on the middle class and defense cuts come January 1. It sucks. It makes Dems feel good but doesn’t help the country one bit.


8 posted on 12/15/2012 9:19:24 PM PST by RC one (Akin/Mourdock-2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45
..as expected; Crybaby / Whimpering Boehmer caves
again...
again...
again...
again...
again...
again...
again...
....
again...
again...
again...
again...
again...
again...
again...
again...
again...
again...
again to the n degree

"Marble-Mouthed" Mitch "something in his Mouth" McConnell; couldn't comment again...

12 posted on 12/15/2012 9:50:19 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Who'll take tomorrow,spend it all today; who can take your income & tax it all away..0Bama man can :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

Wow! Who could have seen this one coming?


13 posted on 12/15/2012 10:21:25 PM PST by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45; All

The GOP needs to dump Boehner now.

Any refusal to make the move just shows me that the GOP are not Conservative. At All. Period


17 posted on 12/15/2012 10:56:07 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (Seems that the ones who understand little about the economy are economists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

Anything less than going over the fiscal cliff (only way I see spending cuts happening) should be met with civil war. The problem is those on the right won’t do it. It is always easier to say it than to do it. We will just proceed to give up more of our freedoms and earned wealth. But hey, so many will boast that they will do something this time. Bah!


18 posted on 12/15/2012 11:33:06 PM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

Actually a surprisingly shrewd move in my view, and I’m not a fan of Boehner at all. But he can toss this out there, and it’s purely for rhetorical/political purposes. The problem is supposedly that Repub’s are holding up everything in order to protect the rich. So Boehner says “OK, but $250K ain’t rich, $1 mil is”.

But anyone making a mil a year can easily shift around their income so as to be completely unaffected by a relatively small change in their tax rate. Nobody’s going to pay a lot more in taxes because of this, and that’s why Obama won’t accept it. But if Obama starts whining that “this will hardly help with the budget at all,” Boehner gets to laugh in his face and say, “neither does raising it on 250K and above”.

But if it ends up being just prelude to caving all the way to 250K, then it’s still a loser though, and knowing Boehner, I have to think that might be a likely scenario.


19 posted on 12/16/2012 12:21:57 AM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

Boehner is doing “WeekEnd at Bernies”..
The republican party is quite DEAD you know..


20 posted on 12/16/2012 3:58:20 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

The situation the Feds are facing is this: when you haven’t a clue how to manage money, you always need more.


21 posted on 12/16/2012 4:57:53 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny (Thought Puzzle: Describe Islam without using the phrase "mental disorder" more than four times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson