Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Big Deficits Became the Norm
The Wall Street Journal ^ | December 18, 2012 | DAVID WESSEL

Posted on 12/18/2012 3:50:32 PM PST by MinorityRepublican

Big budget deficits haven't always been with us.

From the end of the Eisenhower years through the Carter presidency, the deficit averaged a modest 1.4% of the nation's economic output. The budget was nearly balanced in seven of the 20 years from 1960 to 1979. And, as Bill Clinton reminds at every opportunity, the U.S. government was in surplus for four years at the end of his presidency.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/18/2012 3:50:36 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

2 posted on 12/18/2012 3:51:19 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Abandoning the gold standard was one of the first steps down a bad path.


3 posted on 12/18/2012 4:09:36 PM PST by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
And, as Bill Clinton reminds at every opportunity, the U.S. government was in surplus for four years at the end of his presidency.

Clinton didn't have to budget for the Cold War which ended before he took office, was the beneficiary of the tax revenue generated by the jobs created by the tech boom, and punted the WOT and its expense to the next administration.

And yet in spite of this which included the trillion dollar hit we took on 9/11, the deficit was 165 billion and shrinking when, um, what changed in January, 2007?

4 posted on 12/18/2012 4:18:01 PM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (Ho, ho, hey, hey, I'm BUYcotting Chick-Fil-A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

“And, as Bill Clinton reminds at every opportunity, the U.S. government was in surplus for four years at the end of his presidency.”

If there was a surplus, then why did we have to borrow money throughout those four years?


5 posted on 12/18/2012 4:22:53 PM PST by running_dog_lackey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: running_dog_lackey
If there was a surplus, then why did we have to borrow money throughout those four years?

I guess if private government debt doesn't count when calculating the total debt, then one has to admit that there are no trust funds.
6 posted on 12/18/2012 4:51:56 PM PST by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson