Posted on 12/18/2012 3:50:32 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
Big budget deficits haven't always been with us.
From the end of the Eisenhower years through the Carter presidency, the deficit averaged a modest 1.4% of the nation's economic output. The budget was nearly balanced in seven of the 20 years from 1960 to 1979. And, as Bill Clinton reminds at every opportunity, the U.S. government was in surplus for four years at the end of his presidency.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Abandoning the gold standard was one of the first steps down a bad path.
Clinton didn't have to budget for the Cold War which ended before he took office, was the beneficiary of the tax revenue generated by the jobs created by the tech boom, and punted the WOT and its expense to the next administration.
And yet in spite of this which included the trillion dollar hit we took on 9/11, the deficit was 165 billion and shrinking when, um, what changed in January, 2007?
“And, as Bill Clinton reminds at every opportunity, the U.S. government was in surplus for four years at the end of his presidency.”
If there was a surplus, then why did we have to borrow money throughout those four years?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.