Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney ‘had no desire to run,’ son says
yahoo ^ | December 23, 2012 | Dylan Stableford

Posted on 12/23/2012 2:43:14 PM PST by lowbridge

Mitt Romney didn't want to be president, anyway.

That's what Tagg Romney, Mitt's oldest son, told the Boston Globe for its big post-mortem on his father's failed presidential bid published on Sunday.

“He wanted to be president less than anyone I’ve met in my life," Tagg Romney told the paper. "He had no desire to ... run. If he could have found someone else to take his place ... he would have been ecstatic to step aside.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bravosierra; bsmitt; bsromney; epicmittensfail; liarmitt; mittensfail; mittromney; romneo2012; romney; romneybs; romneyliar; saintmitt; shameless; shamelessbs; sourgrapes; stromney; wahtacrock; whatabastard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last
To: vaudine

” He destroyed several good candidates on his way”

Many conservatives said they supported Mitt because he had the best chance to win.

I wonder if Newt would have been better at attacking O and making the conservative case.

If we were going to lose anyway, why not put up someone who could have slammed O.


41 posted on 12/23/2012 3:17:39 PM PST by garjog (Heroes Died. Obama Lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

That is an extremely intersting theory.


42 posted on 12/23/2012 3:18:12 PM PST by NoExpectations
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NoExpectations

It does fit the timeline and the events as they happened.


43 posted on 12/23/2012 3:19:45 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: vaudine

The fact that he or someone close to him would even say this, true or not, is PATHETIC

If we have seen one thing from the leftist, Alinsky, community-activist set - it is that they never stop, never give up, and will use any method to win.


44 posted on 12/23/2012 3:21:02 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

That is so moronic. Gingrich was making traction at the debates, and Romney’s people used their tons of money to negative ad Gingrich to death. By your deeds we shall know you. So cut the crap that he really did not want to be POTUS. He campaigned and lost, cut the excuse.


45 posted on 12/23/2012 3:21:49 PM PST by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

Maybe the Romney boy should get together with the fat McCain girl.


46 posted on 12/23/2012 3:21:49 PM PST by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
political theory demands we purge the corrupt elements and seize control.

As Jefferson saw, when you have a whole lot of single member districts around you gotta' get 50%+1 vote to win. If you form a political party dedicated to winning, the losers will get together and form their own party and they too will seek 50%+1 vote.

Third parties get squeezed out in that mix.

You have to start a new party the way the Republicans did it originally. You take over whatever operating elements you still have ~ which are those state parties ~ AND you create a new party central committee and ask them to send representatives for the purpose of running a President.

Where you have disfunctional state elements, you replace them with other interested groups ~ the Republicans brought in the Abolitionist Movement ~ which had almost become a party but didn't.

There should already be action afoot in the state committees to deal with the RNC, RNC Senate and RNC House committees. I would expect a very good representation there from TEAParty elements.

Serious concern must be given this time to terminating some state parties ~ they don't win, their candidates are all stupid, and if they get an appointed Senator he or she will be a RINO.

No more RINOs ~ their time is over.

47 posted on 12/23/2012 3:22:28 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

I’m guessing Gary Johnson.


48 posted on 12/23/2012 3:24:38 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo
They'd have access to darned near a billion dollars, all the beer they could ever want to drink ~ and you know that deep down in their hearts all those mormons want to drink lots and lots of beer ~ that's why they have those strained smiles ~ beer lust.

Then, too, they'd have no common sense and in a decade their lawyers would have all the money!

49 posted on 12/23/2012 3:25:44 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

If you postulate the dems and GOP really are the same party trying to demoralize us and instil globalism, it makes perfect sense.

Perhaps Alex Jones is only half crazy afterall.


50 posted on 12/23/2012 3:25:52 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

May I have my 300.00 back, you SOB!


51 posted on 12/23/2012 3:26:05 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer. FREEDOM OR FREE STUFF- YOU GET ONE CHOICE, CHOOSE WISELY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

You have chosen poorly. Again. It DOES NOT MATTER. Romney took AZ and my vote was meaningless. As was yours it turns out.


52 posted on 12/23/2012 3:28:05 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Remember one thing.

The infrastructure...aides/secretaries/all of it is hardcore GOP and contains a lot of Mercinary types that have worked for Dems. Again, They have worked for dems. And the last thing they want is a meal ticket altered. Count on them sabotaging any new management.

So you have a powerless party filled with untrustworthy people that has the unjust albatross of racist old white guy around its neck.

You SURE you want to waste the minimal resources the tea party has by comparison?

Then add in all the traditional GOP moneymen fighting you tooth and nail to throw you out.

FAR mor logical to start over. The GOP did it to the Whigs.


53 posted on 12/23/2012 3:33:57 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; Hildy
It obviously WAS NOT a Conservative Year, a Republican Year or a Common Sense Year. It was a “someone else owes me a living” Useful Idiot Year.

The die was cast no matter who was the Republican Candidate. They made Romney, a Moderate, look like Attila the Hun because he wanted people to get Jobs. Liberals don't want Jobs, they want a Sugar Daddy and Obama fills the bill.

They would have convinced the Sheeple that any other Republican Candidate was the love Child of Hitler and Stalin. The Liberals own the Press and they decide what to report. We didn't have a chance.

The simple fact is that there are more of “them” than us, period. If there was ever a chance for people to open their eyes, it was the 2012 Election. It didn't happen and blaming Romney, based on his kid's stupid remark of all things, is completely absurd.

Wish in one hand and spit in the other and tell us which fills up first. The Republic as we knew it is OVER. Now we deal with the fallout and take care of our own.

54 posted on 12/23/2012 3:37:09 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (They Live, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

“The Republic as we knew it is OVER. Now we deal with the fallout and take care of our own. “

On that, I am in total agreement.


55 posted on 12/23/2012 3:38:30 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

You got that right - I watched the 3rd Party debate on C-span - very interesting. If I had to choose one of those people, it would have been old Virgil.


56 posted on 12/23/2012 3:40:24 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

It’s all we have left Norm. God Bless us one and all.

Merry Christmas...


57 posted on 12/23/2012 3:41:25 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (They Live, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge; ExTexasRedhead
The 'morality of compromise' sounds contradictory. Compromise is usually a sign of weakness, or an admission of defeat. Strong men don't compromise, it is said, and principles should never be compromised. Andrew Carnegie
58 posted on 12/23/2012 3:44:31 PM PST by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

And to you and yours.

But as bad as it is, it’s still better than being a liberal so all isn’t lost yet ;)


59 posted on 12/23/2012 3:47:37 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Just finished reading the lengthy “post-mortem” on the Romney campaign in today’s Boston Globe. Talk about a bunch of losers—literally and figuratively. Romney’s political director claims he didn’t know what Obama was doing with his massive paid staff in the swing states until after the election. If you look up “idiot” in the dictionary, you’ll see the picture of the man who made that comment (Rich Beeson in the margins.

Republicans once knew how to organize and win presidential campaigns. Now, we’ve got our own generation of Bob Shrums, trying the latest variant of the Rove playbook.

Newt Gingrich said it well the other day: the GOP is heading for permanent minority status if they don’t get their act together. A lot of us remember the bad old days of Bob Michel and less than 150 GOP members of the House. And sadly, Mr. Michel saw nothing wrong with that; he enjoyed his friendship with Tip O’Neil and Danny Rostenkowski, and they played him like a fiddle.

Morons like “Team Romney” are just another example of how much we miss Lee Atwater. His tragic, early death was an absolute disaster for the GOP.


60 posted on 12/23/2012 3:48:25 PM PST by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson