Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals Panic As They Lose the Gun Narrative
Townhall.com ^ | December 26, 2012 | Kurt Schlichter

Posted on 12/26/2012 5:47:25 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: Kaslin

Shelves empty of guns and ammo and 2 hour wait lists at gun ranges pretty much tell the tale...


21 posted on 12/26/2012 6:37:50 AM PST by CAluvdubya (We're doomed....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
not around her in the deep blue states

Um, it hardly gets bluer than Obama's home state, and even here in Illinois, almost EVERYone I talk to, liberal or otherwise, has come over to the "dark side" of supporting gun rights as a way to protect the children. I totally stumped the most liberal person I work with by a simple challenge, how do you define an assault weapon? These people, at the infantry level, cannot handle even the simplest engagements. Even my own lib extended family, who would normally try to shut me up on any politically controversial topic at a holiday gathering, sat silent or otherwise supportive as I extolled the virtues of gun ownership and the ridiculousness and impossibility of citizen disarmament. Just like the author of this article, I was floored. Pleased, but floored. I had expected an all out "bad family argument." It didn't happen. Amazing.

So, IMHO, if anything, the left is ripe to lose this argument big-time. Why? Because the logic of self-defense is so basic and so natural that even a deeply programmed liberal cannot escape the power of the argument: we have a right and a duty to protect our kids, and weaponizing their caretakers is still the best, simplest way to do this in a world where craziness happens. Period. We win. They lose. Deal with it.

Peace,

SR

22 posted on 12/26/2012 6:38:21 AM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

“Let them try... quitter...”

...You are incorrect. I’m no quitter. I am ashamed of myself however for sounding like one.


23 posted on 12/26/2012 6:38:58 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m not sure “stand-down” articles like this are believable. It would be like this administration to force its way toward gun control, even if everything in the article were true. The enemy is not to be trusted to be predictable.


24 posted on 12/26/2012 6:39:28 AM PST by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
He's on to something, Message boards across the Internet are full of people saying the 2nd amendment is not about protecting hunters its about citizens rights not to be infringed upon to toss out a bad government at the point of a gun if necessary, and of course a God given right to self protection.

The RNC should be out there beating liberal politicians over the head with this instead of trying to find a middle ground, but the RNC is run by RINOs.

25 posted on 12/26/2012 6:40:32 AM PST by reefdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer
Because the logic of self-defense is so basic and so natural that even a deeply programmed liberal cannot escape the power of the argument: we have a right and a duty to protect our kids, and weaponizing their caretakers is still the best, simplest way to do this in a world where craziness happens. Period. We win. They lose. Deal with it.

I hope so. Difficult for me to gauge. Where I live gun ownership is a given. It is the blue Northeast states that concern me.

26 posted on 12/26/2012 6:41:50 AM PST by EagleInGA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It is not what Obama and his crowd of fawning demons do in public view that bothers me, it is what he does behind the scenes that is so damaging. I would not break into the “home run trot” just yet. They will keep trying.


27 posted on 12/26/2012 6:42:45 AM PST by RatRipper (Self-centeredness, greed, envy, deceit and lawless corruption has killed this once great nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

I am ashamed for thinking that your were one. I apologize to you my friend.

Belated Merry Christmas.

LLS


28 posted on 12/26/2012 6:43:02 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (A child is born in Bethlehem KING of KINGS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia; Alas Babylon!

And if they ever do lose the narrative, why they’ll just order up another mass killing or two.

What really, really pains me about your comment is that it is utterly believable and probable .... and that I would even think this to be true is almost unbelievable, except it isn’t.


I too think that this is probable. It might seem paranoid to think that individuals are being watched and primed to commit an atrocity when one is needed to advance an agenda. But for some reason it happens over and over right on schedule when needed. And then the Politicians “have to act quickly” because the media has pushed the populace’s “hot button”.

But if they wait too long to act then reason and the real facts come out to squash their agenda. At that point it’s time to have another atrocity to show that this is not a fluke. All we have to do is look at recent history over the last fifty years to see the pattern.

What’s changed though is that media no longer fully controls the means of distributing information. The cracks in the “Gate keepers Dam of News worthiness” are about to fail spectacularly.


29 posted on 12/26/2012 6:43:14 AM PST by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man; MissMagnolia; Alas Babylon!

Most people, especially gov’t/elite worshipping leftists, are appalled at the notion that those in power would seek even more power through mass murder.

But they will, and historically, it’s proven that it is ENTIRELY likely that they will.


30 posted on 12/26/2012 6:45:51 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Without guns, how will you shoot back?


31 posted on 12/26/2012 6:46:00 AM PST by Flintlock (PARANOIA--means having all the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
Millions will march on DC and millions will defend our Constitution with their blood. Count me in if it comes to it. “FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS”.

I got nothin to lose anyways.

32 posted on 12/26/2012 6:46:57 AM PST by Lazamataz (LAZ'S LAW: As an argument with liberals goes on, the probability of being called racist approaches 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

Bttt


33 posted on 12/26/2012 6:51:06 AM PST by aberaussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flintlock

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.- B. Franklin


34 posted on 12/26/2012 6:54:46 AM PST by TADSLOS (I took extra credit at the School of Hard Knocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 98ZJ USMC

My sister works with the ‘Safe Neighborhoods Project’, a get guns off the streets program and she agrees with the cops in schools idea and has talked about getting a gun for protection because of some of the bad ‘hoods’ she goes into.

I think the Left lost this argument years ago. I know at least five women who have purchased personal protection guns in the last couple of years because of what they see as a dangerous devolution of society. I think all these women have taken the ‘when seconds count the police are only minutes away’ mantra to heart.


35 posted on 12/26/2012 6:57:09 AM PST by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant
I don’t think they have lost the narrative at all.

I notice they haven't talked too much about the murders of the firefighters in Webster NY. I also notice that BamBam didn't interrupt his Hawaiian vacation extravaganza (all on our dime) to visit with the families of the victims of that massacre. A few reasons I suspect (I'm a cynic I know)

1) The gunman served 17 years in prison for killing his grandmother with a hammer in 1980. He was convicted only of manslaughter, and was paroled in 1998. Maybe Liberals see that this would cause the masses to start calling for more stringent sentences on convicted psychos, and that goes against all that the Schumers of the world believe in.

2) The suspect was already banned from owning guns. Notice it didn't stop him from setting a fire, waiting for the firemen to arrive then gunning them down. Even if he didn't have a gun who's to say the fire he set wouldn't have taken out a fireman.

3)NY has the toughest gun laws in the country. He was forbidden to possess a gun.....didn't stop him.

So this psycho didn't fit the media template therefore the story will be forgotten within a week.

36 posted on 12/26/2012 6:57:48 AM PST by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I think the tide is turning in our favor. Per local law any building owner may prohibit bringing firearms into the building by posting a notice . In my office such a notice has been affixed to the entrances for years. The building manager was asked a day after the Newtown murders if he would consider taking it down. They were removed this week.


37 posted on 12/26/2012 7:02:55 AM PST by Controlling Legal Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia; Alas Babylon!
And if they ever do lose the narrative, why they’ll just order up another mass killing or two.

Don't forget this is the justice dept behind Fast & Furious. This was the original intent behind that debacle. Give Mexican drug gangs access to high powered weapons, a few killings in the U.S. and viola, anti gun hysteria and calls for gun bans and confiscations. Newtown CT just accomplished that (in the left's eyes) more efficiently and with no connection to the regime.

Things I thought of as unthinkable 4 years ago seem very likely today.

38 posted on 12/26/2012 7:04:44 AM PST by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MrB

What I find interesting coming from my liberal friends is their total lack of acceptance that a government could turn on its people to the point that the people would feel compelled to fight back. I always get the eye roll, OMG sigh and the ‘it’s not the 18th century anymore’ comment.


39 posted on 12/26/2012 7:05:23 AM PST by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Here’s how we win:

Do what I did Saturday. I took two teacher friends out and shot guns with them. We shot several guns (that I unfortunately lost later after they fell out of a canoe) and the two friends genuinely had a good time breaking bottles and shooting scope. They are now interested in purchasing (and loving) their own set of guns.

If each of us did that, we will win.


40 posted on 12/26/2012 7:05:53 AM PST by struggle (http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson