Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear
Those who restrict us from defending ourselves should be held liable for not protecting us.

The courts, including the Supreme Court, have repeatedly held that Law Enforcement is unable to prevent every murder or mass killing, nor do they have the obligation to do so!

Hello??!!??

44 posted on 12/28/2012 6:43:29 PM PST by publius911 (Look for the Union Label -- then buy something else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: publius911

Nice try. However they are responsible when they take our rights away as per the 2nd amendment they have made us vulnerable. They also use the flawed reasoning that the police are there “to protect and serve” so we shouldn’t need guns. Shout all you want but they have put themselves into just the position you claim they don’t have.


50 posted on 12/28/2012 7:05:37 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: publius911
BTW >> The courts, including the Supreme Court,<<

The courts also said you have to pay for others insurance and won’t look at the eligibility of the usurper. So how’s that “Supreme Court” workin out for ya? Hello?

51 posted on 12/28/2012 7:08:20 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson