Posted on 01/01/2013 1:44:44 AM PST by Olog-hai
Three days after CIA and State Department eyewitnesses reported on Sept. 15 that there had been no protest in Benghazi, Libya, before terrorists attacked the U.S. diplomatic mission and a CIA facility there on Sept. 11, President Barack Obama and White House Spokesman Jay Carney both publicly linked the attacks, which killed four Americans, to protests against an anti-Muslim video that had been posted on YouTube.
However, according to a new report by the Senate Homeland Security Committee, personnel working at the CIA Annex in Benghazi on Sept. 11 reported on Sept. 15 that there had been no protest in Benghazi that day, and State Department security personnel who survived the Benghazi attacks told FBI interviewers on Sept. 15 and Sept. 16 that they, too, had seen no evidence of any protest before the attacks.
If President Obama and his spokesman did not know by Sept. 18 what the CIA and the FBI already conclusively knew by then, people working in the State Departments Diplomatic Security command center certainly didas an internal State Department email exchange showed.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
The liars do protest too much.Obama, Carney Publicly Linked Benghazi to Video 3 Days After CIA, State Dept. Eyewitnesses Reported There Was No Protest
TREASON - in real-time, pre-meditated, continuous, ongoing...
(you don’t need a conspiracy theorist to know which way the wind blows)
Questions NEVER asked. Answers NEVER forthcoming.
Beyond the CIA, right after the attack we read here that there was no protest. There was the owner of the building saying so. There were eyewitness reports saying so. Meanwhile the administration was apologizing for embassy attacks in Egypt that evolved from protests. If we gave them the benefit of the doubt we would say the administration was confused about Egypt (protests) and Libya (terrorist attack). OTOH, they are proven sleazy liars so, no.
Hillary made em do it!
I updated my cruddy graphic to include Russia's move to the Syrian port of Tartus.
Slick & Mrs. Slick got away with the murder of Vince Foster right at the beginning of his first term. It went down hill from there. . . . . . . . . . .
That is an interesting graphic illustration of the importance of Benghazi.
The US news "reporters" then went apoplectic over the Romney criticism. For several days US reporters underwent a feeding frenzy over Romney's mild criticism of "The One". This emboldened Obama to deflect the obvious indication of his foreign policy failures in Libya and the Middle East as simple protests over a video. He was rightfully convinced that the media would go after Romney for partisan criticism, rather that himself for inane policy.
Obama has played this exactly right. There has yet to be any serious reporting of his and Madame Clinton's inept Middle East Foreign Policy failures.
As usual, the media for the Ruling Class tells us there is nothing here and to move on...
When the spontaneous lie fell through they continued to lie so people would say there was no connection between the protest and the attack, which people know believe.
In reality, the attack was planned then the protest was planned to make it appear as if the terrorist are so in tune with the news they can pick up on a news story and plan an attack in a matter of a few minutes, in other words “spontaneous”.
The purpose of the protest was to create the spontaneous lie.
Hillary and Obama orchestrated the attack, and the “spontaneous” lie is the proof. They lied about what was supposed to happen but never happened.
I’ll always think the protests over the video in Cairo were planted by the DC MusBro cabal to set the stage for taking away the 1st amendment of free speech when it comes to Islam. Benghazi got in the way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.