"Don't worry, Thenator! You're thafe with uth!"
I propose making the names and addresses of government officials publicly available.
Sounds like a good idea. That way, the criminals will know which homes are safe to hit and we won’t have so many injured criminals.
"Don't worry, Thenator! You're thafe with uth!"
State senator Martin Looney. ‘nuff said.
State senator Martin Looney. ‘nuff said.
OK, then publish all his personal data on the Internet: name. address, kids’ names, phone numbers (land, cell), e-mail accounts, bank accounts, house photos, floor plan, security arrangements, arrest records, EVERYTHING! Make his life totally transparent. See if he likes it.
This lawmaker is a terrorist.
make all lawmakers’ personal info freel available. and i mean everything.
let’s’ see how they like it.
>>Rep. Stephen Dargan of West Haven doesn’t back down from a fight. When people call and leave threatening messages he calls them back. By Friday at 2 p.m. he had about 70 messages on his home answering machine in response to his proposal to make the names and addresses of gun permit holders public. That information has been confidential since 1994.
“Everytime you try to expand Freedom of Information statutes everybody goes nuts,” Dargan said Friday. But he’s not fazed by the opposition to the bill. “I’m used to it,” Dargan said. “I’ve been a representative for a very long time.” Dargan was elected to the House in 1990. As chair of the Public Safety Committee, Dargan deals with law enforcement on a regular basis. But he said he hasn’t felt compelled to call any police officers to inform them of the phone messages. Dargan let CTNewsJunkie listen to one of the angry calls from a gun enthusiast. “You need to stop this please,” the caller said. “This has gone too far.” The male caller described the legislation as a “hate crime” against gun owners. Dargan, whose home phone is publicly listed, calls many of the callers back and talks to them if their number shows up on caller ID. He said they may not agree, but they seem to reach an understanding. “I’m a middle-of-the-road guy,” Dargan said.
Most of the anti-gun people are also avid abortionists and strong supporters of Roe v Wade. Ironically, Roe v Wade was decided on elusive right to privacy on which the justices couldn’t agree where that right resided in the constitution. So the anti-gunners are willing to abort Roe v Wade to be able to grab all the guns they can.
Senario...........if a nieghbor of yours confronts you for owning a fire arm and an altercation arises where the nieghbor is shot dead are these cretans not liable for indirectly inciting this incident, Much like yelling fire in a crowded theater?
Not if you have a bayonet.
is proposing ammunition control legislation...
I’ve been harping for many years on FR the fact that if they can’t get your guns they will get your ammunition.
The right to keep and bear arms (physical shooting objects and devices to protect yourself) mentions nothing about the right to keep ammunition.....if parsed by greasy, liberal, Marxist judges in the stacked Supreme Court.
Remember the phrase “what is the meaning of is” in the Clinton crime syndicate? Anything can be contorted into meaning something else by slick lawyers.
In this day and age with communism being home grown within Washington D.C. we are in very dangerous times.
I propose that all democrat politicians wear a sandwich board with their address and home phone number on both sides along with their childrens’ names and what schools they go to.
“State Rep. Stephen Dargen, a Democratic legislator from West Haven, wants the names and addresses of about 170,000 handgun permit holders in the state to be made public.”
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
LEO and Corrections officers might not be too happy about that
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2975153/posts
Why don’t legal gun owners preempt this assault by placing big signs in their front yards which read, “There are legally obtained guns on these premises”.
Seriously, someone’s going to get hurt with this idiocy. Could be someone hiding from an abuser, or a current or retired cop who has enemies who are spoiling for payback.
ANY information in the hands of government is already compromised. If it suits the desires of governments or tyrants it WILL be utilized.
This will simply encourage non-registration and non-compliance with government edicts. Once you start getting people in the habit of not obeying government edicts and taxes, it’s hard to get them back.
Hey Looney, when you permanently give up your 1st amendment right to free speech, come talk to me about giving up my 2nd amendment right.
If the do, that information must be correct lest the state be liable for consequence of errors. Seems that list published by a newspaper has a 25% error rate.
Names of gun owners are now confidential, but Dargen believes if people know how many guns are spread across communities, they’ll be safer.
I'll take a wild stab at it and guess... 170,000?