Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Could Use the Whiskey the Tea Party Drinks
Townhall.com ^ | January 7, 2013 | John Ransom

Posted on 01/07/2013 4:01:08 AM PST by Kaslin

While many of our heroes have lost their gloss, Abraham Lincoln still shines brightly for many Americans because there is so much to learn from his life.

For example, in 1858 Abraham Lincoln was defeated in his race for the United States Senate by Stephen Douglas, making it Lincoln’s third electoral defeat in a row. As Lincoln emerged from the telegraph office into the rain-soaked street in Springfield, Illinois he lost his balance when his foot slipped on the slick boardwalk. Catching himself before he tumbled into the mud Lincoln muttered to under his breath, “A slip, but not a fall.”

He then smiled brightly.

Recognizing the symbolic importance for his political life of catching himself before he fell, Lincoln understood that his political career was not over despite his string of defeats. He started for home reenergized. In two years he was elected President of the United States.

“I claim not to have controlled event,” Lincoln candidly wrote in 1864, “but confess plainly that events have controlled me.”

Lincoln’s critics (both contemporary and posthumous) have often pointed to this confession as a sign that while Lincoln successfully rode the whirlwind of Civil War, he was not the builder of the nation that others have claimed- a kind of second founding father after Washington.

But it was this essentially negative trait (negative in the sense that it was passive and did not require action) that allowed Lincoln to remake US society on the basis of the words of the Declaration of Independence that declared “all men are created equal,” to include African Americans. He was able to accomplish this revolutionary object through passive management of the Civil War without turning it in to a “remorseless revolutionary struggle,” which might have irreparably divided the nation during Reconstruction.

Nowhere was Lincoln’s task more arduous than in managing and massaging the personalities of his generals (and to a lesser extent, members of Congress). Many of Lincoln’s strongest critics were generals who felt that Lincoln wasn’t taking their advice on how to conduct the war. In this chapter we will explore how Lincoln ignored personality (and public opinion) in supporting his generals and stuck to the principle of rewarding those that fought and won battles.

The most striking examples of this were the cases of General George McClellan and US Grant.

McClellan was the commander of the Army of the Potomac and later general-in-chief of all Federal forces. Mostly on the strength of a strong personality, McClellan dazzled soldiers and politicians despite the fact that he squandered several opportunities to beat the Confederates in battle. He was glamorous, good looking and just credible enough to be plausible. Lincoln however was not fooled.

Instead, Lincoln found himself drawn to the unpopular and often shy US Grant. Grant won battles even though he was publicly ridiculed for being a drunkard, slovenly and lacking in refinement. When a group protested Lincoln keeping Grant in command despite hearsay that Grant was a drunkard, Lincoln only reply was asking them what brand whiskey Grant drank so he could get some for his other generals who hadn’t yet won a battle.

Lincoln once famously observed, “I have endured a great deal of ridicule without much malice; and have received a great deal of kindness, not quite free from ridicule. I am used to it."

Indeed, during Lincoln’s life he was ridiculed over his origins, (from a log-cabin); his looks (he described himself as “homely”); his lack of formal education (he was mostly self-taught); his wife (who could be quite arrogant and aggressive, not to say crazy); and a great deal besides. Probably no President dealt with as much abuse as Lincoln. Yet throughout his life Lincoln rarely struck back at his critics. He maintained, instead, a firm confidence about who he was which helped him turn critics into supporters.

In 1855, for example, Lincoln was hired to represent Cyrus McCormick who was claiming patent infringement against a defendant. In addition, McCormick retained a number of better established lawyers from the eastern US, including Edwin M. Stanton. As the trial commenced in Cincinnati, the other attorneys ignored Lincoln, shutting him out of the case with Stanton going so far as to call Lincoln “that damned long armed Ape,” within his hearing. Lincoln swallowed his pride and watched the trial from the courtroom with other spectators.

When McCormick later sent Lincoln a check for his services on the case, Lincoln returned the check explaining that he really hadn’t done anything to earn it.

When the client returned the check to Lincoln and insisted that he cash the check, Lincoln again swallowed his pride and cashed the check despite his grumbling about the “rough” treatment he got from Stanton.

What’s most amazing is that Lincoln later picked Stanton to become his War Secretary after the resignation of Simon Cameron. At the time of his selection Stanton was still an avowed critic of Lincoln. Lincoln was willing to overlook this because of Stanton’s superb managerial skills. As their relationship matured Stanton became one of Lincoln’s warmest admirers. Standing at the foot of Lincoln’s bed as the latter died of a gunshot wound to the head, Stanton proclaimed of Lincoln: “Now he be belongs to the ages.”

The GOP right now could use a backward glance at Father Abraham and the lessons he bring with the ages.

Defeat in one election doesn’t always mean defeat forever. It helps, however, if you know what you where you are and whither you are tending; if you have high ideals and stick to them, as Lincoln did.

Too, we mustn’t always be so ready to excoriate our foes- foes inside our own party who are often arrogant, unreliable and closed minded, these people we call RINOs. We will later need these valuable allies to get elected and run the party.

But to those who are quick to criticize the Tea Party trend inside the GOP as unrefined and often perhaps extreme, I would remind them that just like in the case of Grant, the whiskey we drink more often leads to victory than defeat. And really, you can’t say that much about your other generals.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

1 posted on 01/07/2013 4:01:14 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’ll drink to that!

LLS


2 posted on 01/07/2013 4:06:03 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The GOP is not “man” enough to drink the Tea Party’s whiskey! It takes courage and there is non in the GOP anymore.


3 posted on 01/07/2013 4:06:52 AM PST by vet7279
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Whiskey? Bone head? He’s there! Maybe he would be better if he were drunk than he is when he’s straight. Looking at all the options? grasping for straws? get ready for this! “looking for hope and change”?! We are in a deep hole in the ground with no ladder.


4 posted on 01/07/2013 4:10:33 AM PST by ronnie raygun (Being Breitbart, Lexington / Concord, America's first gun grab attempt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

this is gonna be a good thread...

my whiskey is crown royal...


5 posted on 01/07/2013 4:12:30 AM PST by joe fonebone (The clueless... they walk among us, and they vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

I don’t think you can get it in the US, but if you see any “Forty Creek”, buy it. Beats them all.


6 posted on 01/07/2013 4:19:25 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"... Stanton proclaimed of Lincoln: “Now he be belongs to the ages.”

A minor quibble, Stanton may have said this but there was no report of it until nearly thirty years after Lincoln died. It sounds more poetic than accurate.

7 posted on 01/07/2013 4:23:00 AM PST by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

is this a straight or blended whiskey???


8 posted on 01/07/2013 4:30:16 AM PST by joe fonebone (The clueless... they walk among us, and they vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We need our own UKIP. The original went from being a mocked 5th party to potentially picking up tons of seats in the next national election in the UK.


9 posted on 01/07/2013 4:42:05 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
For example, in 1858 Abraham Lincoln was defeated in his race for the United States Senate by Stephen Douglas, making it Lincoln’s third electoral defeat in a row.

I believe this is inaccurate.

Lincoln ran for IL Senator in 1854 and 1858, though these weren't exactly elections where he was a candidate.

The state legislature, not the people, elected the Senator, so the race was between whether the nominated candidate for Senate could get more of his guys elected to the legislature.

Anyway, that's only two defeats.

10 posted on 01/07/2013 4:43:36 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
“I claim not to have controlled event,” Lincoln candidly wrote in 1864, “but confess plainly that events have controlled me.” ... he was not the builder of the nation that others have claimed- a kind of second founding father after Washington.

I doubt Washington would have claimed that he was able to "control events." He waited for an opportunity and counter-punched, with Yorktown the classic example.

11 posted on 01/07/2013 4:48:16 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
But it was this essentially negative trait (negative in the sense that it was passive and did not require action) that allowed Lincoln to remake US society on the basis of the words of the Declaration of Independence that declared “all men are created equal,” to include African Americans.

OMG, people...wake UP!

Lincoln didn't 'remake US society on the basis of the words of the Declaration of Independence', the Founders had already done that!

Lincoln repeatedly shat on the Constitution and our entire system of Law by making the federal government the final arbitrator of ALL Rights.

----------

He IGNORED the historical, documented fact the States had seceded from the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union.

He IGNORED legal precedent set by the USSC Court of Appeals.

He IGNORED the Constitutional provision of waiting for a Declaration of War before mustering troops.

He IGNORED the 10th Amendment.

He IGNORED the Constitutional provision concerning a Republican form of government.

He gave us the first executive orders

He gave us the first tax on wages.

He gave us 'reconstruction'... the precursor to affirmative action.

-----------

IMHO, admiring Lincoln while hating Obama is the vilest form of hypocrisy, because Obama DOES ACT just like Lincoln!

12 posted on 01/07/2013 4:50:21 AM PST by MamaTexan (To follow Original Constitutional Intent, one MUST acknowledge the Right of secession)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

High ideals? That’s not what comes to mind when I think of the GOP lately.


13 posted on 01/07/2013 5:02:49 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
Too bad the rebels were on the wrong side of history, otherwise he wouldn't have had to do those things.

The Founding Fathers never thought that rebellious states would be the oppressors and fighting against liberty.

14 posted on 01/07/2013 5:05:24 AM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

Yep.


15 posted on 01/07/2013 5:10:34 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Courtesy of The Doors:

Well, show me the way
To the next whisky bar
Oh, don’t ask why
Oh, don’t ask why

Show me the way
To the next whisky bar
Oh, don’t ask why
Oh, don’t ask why

For if we don’t find
The next whisky bar
I tell you we must die
I tell you we must die
I tell you, I tell you
I tell you we must die

Oh, moon of Alabama
We now must say goodbye
We’ve lost our good old mama
And must have whisky, oh, you know why

Oh, moon of Alabama
We now must say goodbye
We’ve lost our good old mama
And must have whisky, oh, you know why

Well, show me the way
To the next little girl
Oh, don’t ask why
Oh, don’t ask why

Show me the way
To the next little girl
Oh, don’t ask why
Oh, don’t ask why

For if we don’t find
The next little girl
I tell you we must die
I tell you we must die
I tell you, I tell you
I tell you we must die

Oh, moon of Alabama
We now must say goodbye
We’ve lost our good old mama
And must have whisky, oh, you know why


16 posted on 01/07/2013 5:17:53 AM PST by NRA1995 (I'd rather be a living "gun culture" member than a dead anti-gun candy-ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Too bad the rebels were on the wrong side of history, otherwise he wouldn't have had to do those things.

Constitutionally, the South was right. Do you believe the government is only held to Constitutional provisions until some elected official decides they're on the 'wrong side of history'?

-----

The Founding Fathers never thought that rebellious states would be the oppressors and fighting against liberty.

LOLOLOLOL! You DO realize the Founders are the ones who PUT slavery in the Constitution, don't you?

17 posted on 01/07/2013 5:31:53 AM PST by MamaTexan (To follow Original Constitutional Intent, one MUST acknowledge the Right of secession)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

Templeton Rye.

Best Rye I have ever tasted.


18 posted on 01/07/2013 5:33:39 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The GOP and the Tea Party both could stand to sober up and realize what they're really up against.
The hard core that these people worship grew up bombing ROTC centers, robbing banks, murdering cops, and inciting violent riots. Until they're confronted by the same sort of dedication, in spades, they won't take anyone who isn't on their side seriously. They got where they are by playing an inside game pushed along with violence their "outside: comrades incited which kept the threat of massive violence driving their agenda. The same sort of game backed by the same sort of open violence is all they understand.

That's exactly why they're so rabid about gun control. When I was still in High School the bastards were running a letter writing campaign at the State level objecting to the sale of .22 caliber, .38 caliber, and 30-06 caliber, ammunition in nearly every 7-11 type store in the state. One of their main concerns then was, "will hicks start shooting protesters".

To Hell with just protecting "Assault Weapons". When Congress critters are as inscrure as the poorest folks in a bad neighborhood, you can buy ammunition at every little market like you could in the fifties, and carrying a firearm openly or concealed doesn't require any sort of permit, then things will be back to the sort of freedom the authors of the Constitution envisioned.

19 posted on 01/07/2013 5:34:21 AM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
The South fired the first shot and confiscated Federal property.

The South, unhappy with the status quo, wanted to spread slavery and force it upon people who were for freedom.

If bad consequences came from the Civil War it was because the South didn't have a just cause for rebellion.

20 posted on 01/07/2013 5:48:49 AM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson