Posted on 01/07/2013 9:22:51 PM PST by Errant
The following is an excellent interview of a part-time police lieutenant conducted by The SGT Report. Given all the inconsistencies surrounding the theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado, it behooves us to examine ANY mass shooting event with a carefully placed microscope and a skeptical eye. The events of Sandy Hook are still fresh and chaotic, and not all the facts are in, but we have yet to see the inconsistencies of the initial reports on the scene addressed, and, we still have not seen a single piece of surveillance footage to clear the abnormalities in the official story. Columbine's video footage was used by the establishment almost immediately after the attacks, yet, nothing from Newtown? As the interviewer in the following video states, we are not saying that the events at Sandy Hook are conclusively a false flag, however, the possibility should not be dismissed out of hand. If we are to go through a national battle over the 2nd Amendment rights of millions of people over Sandy Hook, we should at least have the right information before hand.
(Excerpt) Read more at alt-market.com ...
Nov. 7th - Will the constitution and gun rights be disarmed?
Interesting interview. Thanks for the post. BTTT.
I used to think that. Maybe some ineptitude, maybe the legacy of the Gorelick Memo allowed the events of that day. Then I saw video of Building 7 coming down and I wasn't so sure.
What was the end result of 9/11?
No, not for Iraq (how did they get in there, anyway?), nor for the Afghans, who have seen armies come and go, and of course Bin Laden, whom we are told is dead.
Not the bad guys, but for Americans?
The TSA, DHS, the Patriot Act, the routing monitoring of ALL electronic communications, the incessant gun control drum--only they are not letting go this time, gropings in airports after tons of jacknives, embroidery scissors, and fingernail clippers were confiscated, not to mention tanker cars of shampoo and other ointments and unguents.
Are we any safer, really?
No.
But we are poked and prodded, scanned and listened in on, deprived of property, privacy, dignity, and the right to travel unmolested and Government has grown fatter and more ravenous as a result.
SO what happened on 9/11?
America lost.
If we had won that war on terror (now aimed at conservatives who believe in the Bible and the Constitution) our lives would not have changed. We would have buried our dead, created more of theirs, and brought our boys home.
Instead the US Government is/was distributing weapons to criminals, granting weapons and foreign aid to our stated enemies, and treating us like we are terrorists--all the while our enemies are emboldened by our stupidity.
About gravity?
That sure looked like an intentional demolition to me. Have you seen the video (Not of the towers, but the collapse of WTC 7)?
I understand the physics of the WTC 1 and 2 collapsing, but fail to understand why building 7 came down, especially the way it did.
Do I think the GWB administration actively participated in the plane impacts with the towers? No. But there was intel that was not acted on to prevent it.
Bottom line is that we lost a significant amount of freedom, we aren't any safer, and everything done then has laid the foundation for much worse for our freedom since and much worse to come.
Government power has grown considerably, and with that has come the continued (if not accelerated) diminishment of our Rights.
Now we have someone in the White House who fancies himself King, who has abused every agency and power he has (much as a result of legislation passed after 9/11), and it's going to get far worse before it gets better.
Have you seen the footage of the reporters saying that “tower 7 fell moments ago” and talking about all the destruction while tower 7 still stands in the background?
Yes, I've seen videos of WTC 7 collapsing. I've also spent countless hours researching and reading the reports from on scene firefighters of the structural damage sustained by 7 from falling debris from WTC 1 and/or 2. I also read about the unsuppressed fires in WTC 7 and the amount of diesel fuel stored on the premises.
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
"Hayden: Yeah. There was enough there and we were marking off. There were a lot of damaged apparatus there that were covered. We tried to get searches in those areas. By now, this is going on into the afternoon, and we were concerned about additional collapse, not only of the Marriott, because there was a good portion of the Marriott still standing, but also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse."
Yes. I also heard reports that as many as 10,000 people had died in the collapsing towers, reports of other planes, etc., etc., etc. I'm not sure most of the talking heads could identify the different buildings in the WTC. Initial reports are rarely accurate in major catastrophes.
Can’t listen to it. Those damn drums in the background are too annoying.
Note I'm not condemning nor accusing anyone, just noting my impressions. I am willing to consider other data.
Whatever brought the building down does not change my assessment of the results. America has become a far more totalitarian state as a result, and frankly, that does not make us a bit safer as it is a threat to all that America stood for.
This is a good place to begin. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
As long as people refuse to take responsibility for their safety and security, as a country we'll move closer and closer to a socialist state. How the hell could Obama win a first term, let alone a second?
We aren’t safer *and* it also doesn’t make a bit of sense. Why didn’t we just adopt Israel’s protocols?
They were/ are a proven success & heavily tested.
Why would the AG need to meet with investigators over Newtown?...Wasn’t there some kind of ‘small’ school shooting in Beslan, Russia by ISLAMIC TERRORISTS eight years ago? I had heard that was dress rehearsal for an American school shooting in the future. But as we all know, Obama stopped terrorists and we no longer have to worry about them. The other three handcuffed prisoners? Put on a plane back to Chechnya?
Your preference respected, if they RESIDE in America, they are RESIDENTS of America.
Hmmmm,
After what other incidents has the AG of these united states gone and met with the local investigators?
Look for a pattern....
ping
Your memory is faulty. There was plenty of talk about gun control.
Yes there was.
What is different this time is:
President Obama does not have to run for reelection, so he can be more "flexible".
The left is desperate to get a gun ban because they have been losing the issue for 18 years and this mass shooting with small kids gives them a better opportunity.
The MSM is also losing power and desperate to get this done.
We have an usurper residing in our White House.
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.