Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GI (Manning) motive barely admissible in WikiLeaks case
AP ^ | 1-16-2013 | DAVID DISHNEAU

Posted on 01/17/2013 6:49:33 AM PST by Sir Napsalot

FORT MEADE, Md. (AP) -- A military judge's ruling on Wednesday tightly limited an Army private's ability to argue he had good reasons for allegedly sending hundreds of thousands of classified documents to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks.

Pfc. Bradley Manning can use motive evidence at his June 3 trial only to show that he didn't know the leaked material would be seen by al-Qaida, or to seek leniency at sentencing, Col. Denise Lind ruled during a pretrial hearing. Evidence of motive isn't relevant to the other charges, she said.

Prosecutors say Manning told an online confidant-turned-government-informant that he leaked the material because "I want people to see the truth" and "information should be free." Lind said such material is only relevant as evidence of "whether he knew he was dealing with the enemy."

She also barred Manning from using at trial any reports compiled by government agencies that concluded the WikiLeaks revelations didn't compromise national security. The defense can use such material only during sentencing.

The ruling was largely a victory for the government, which had asked Lind to exclude any use of motive evidence from the trial. ......

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/17/2013 6:49:38 AM PST by Sir Napsalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Not an expert in this area, but consider it’s written by AP, should we be skeptical of a ‘largely a victory for the governmen?


2 posted on 01/17/2013 6:51:38 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

” ability to argue he had good reasons for allegedly sending hundreds of thousands of classified documents to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks.”

What good reason could the little poofter have?!
He was miffed off that he couldn’t marry his boyfriend and sold out his country.
His actions led to the deaths of people outed in the papers he leaked.
Plus he had help from someone else to get some of that data as it was above is clearance.


3 posted on 01/17/2013 7:01:01 AM PST by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

What, the fact that he’s a contemptuous faggot isn’t permissible?

Just like this spy-faggot:

Jeffrey Carney
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Carney
Jeffrey Carney is a former U.S. Air Force intelligence specialist convicted of spying for East German Ministry for State Security (MfS). One of the MfS’s most successful spies, code-named “Kid”, Carney became alienated and angry at the Air Force and US policies under Ronald Reagan. He began handing over U.S. military documents to the MfS while working in West Berlin for the Air Force. After his transfer back to Goodfellow AFB in 1984, Carney decided to once again request permanent asylum in East Germany. His whereabouts remained unknown until 1990 and he was carried on the rolls as a deserter. Carney was finally kidnapped after fall of the Berlin Wall by the agents of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) on the 22nd of April, 1991 in the Friedrichshain district of Berlin.


4 posted on 01/17/2013 7:07:40 AM PST by TSgt (Infringe upon my 2nd Amendment rights and learn how to speed read at 3000 feet per second...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Why isn’t Bradley Manning swinging from a noose already?


5 posted on 01/17/2013 8:34:46 AM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers ("I'm not anti-anything, I just wanna be free." - Mike Muir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Give the little treasonous gay a fair trial and if and when he is found guilty, execute him. He deserves nothing less than to serve as an example.


6 posted on 01/17/2013 8:35:09 AM PST by toolman1401
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
The question is not if Manning is guilty of leaking or his motive(s).

My question is why there is no inquiry into how he got those sensitive info way beyond his clearance? And we don't hear any committee attempt to have an inquiry?

7 posted on 01/17/2013 8:51:44 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

“My question is why there is no inquiry into how he got those sensitive info way beyond his clearance? And we don’t hear any committee attempt to have an inquiry?”

Good Question!


8 posted on 01/17/2013 8:56:05 AM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

But seriously folks.

I don’t think his motive was spite, but rather blackmail.


9 posted on 01/17/2013 3:02:27 PM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

He is using the I’m gay and I have special protected class rights defense. I’m the victim and not the criminal psycho babble. Hang ‘em high.


10 posted on 01/17/2013 9:50:47 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson