[Nachum]

When it is all said and done Joe, we don't have time for- you.

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[GeronL]

didn’t he just destroy their whole argument with that statement?

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[2ndDivisionVet]

“There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.” ~Ayn Rand

[CottShop]

[[Biden to NRA: We ‘don’t have the time’ to prosecute people who lie on background checks]]

Freeper to Binden- “Do you have tiem to prosecute peopel who lie on their Application to become Praesident”?

[entropy12]

Where did I hear, in Singapore if one is caught with illegal gun, one gets a life sentence, and if the gun is used in a crime, it is then a death sentence. That sounds harsh but could explain their very low crime rate.

[The Cajun]

We 'don’t have the time' to prosecute people who lie on background checks

This poor clown just blew their more laws argument out of the water, admitted their incompetence and has no idea what he did.
There's stupid and there is super stupid, crazy Joe is super.

[Secret Agent Man]

so we pass all these ‘needed’ laws yet don’t proscute people who break them.

then why have the laws, joe? they’re meaningless if you don’t prosecute the criminals breaking them.

[TomGuy]

If the FED doesn’t have time to prosecute those who ‘lie’ on the background check form, then why even have the form or require it to be filled out?

This is just another Lib/Lefist ‘feelgoodism’ that looks good on paper.

The only ones who will honestly fill out the forms are the ones the Admin/Dems and MSM are currently vilifying.

Criminals won’t bother with accuracy, if they even bother to fill out the form.

It is sort of like the adage: locks only keep honest people out.

[petitfour]

Like background checks for security clearances? Like TSA employees’ background checks? Like someone checking to see if a guy running for president was a foreign citizen for the purposes of attending a US university?

[Kickass Conservative]

So that explains why David Gregory wasn't prosecuted for waving the Illegal 30 Round Magazine at Wayne LaPierre in Washington D.C.

The Government was too damn busy, unless it was LaPierre doing the same thing to David Gregory of course.

[Lucky9teen]

[LibLieSlayer]

Too busy implementing stalin’s plan huh joe... you &*($&*&@* idiot.

LLS

[DTogo]

Mordor-on-the-Potomac has become so morbidly obese with laws, rules and regulations that it can't move to enforce them.

Joe just admitted that Mordor doesn't "have the time" or resources to enforce any type of gun registration or confiscation if We the People were to comply or ignore.

[NewJerseyJoe]

Ummmm .... I thought that the PURPOSE of a background check is to ensure that the submitted information was correct and truthful. And now Clueless Joe is saying that they can’t get that process straight?

[Arrowhead1952]

I am positive that Joe bite me was chosen as veep as assassination insurance. Dumber than a box of rocks.

[Sirius Lee]

Submitting false information on an ATF Form 4473 — required for the necessary background check to obtain a firearm — is a felony punishable by up to ten years in prison, depending on prior convictions and the judge, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

So Joe is telegraphing that the administration has no plans to prosecute the ATF's number 2 man for doing just that? Figures.

If the ATF won't police it's own, and can't enforce the law on the rest of us, how does Joe expect to enforce his gun grab?

[Sirius Lee]

Submitting false information on an ATF Form 4473 — required for the necessary background check to obtain a firearm — is a felony punishable by up to ten years in prison, depending on prior convictions and the judge, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

So Joe is telegraphing that the administration has no plans to prosecute the ATF's number 2 man for doing just that? Figures.

If the ATF won't police it's own, and can't enforce the law on the rest of us, how does Joe expect to enforce his gun grab?

[Sir Napsalot]

And fools like Ed Morrissey on Hot Air at the end of his opinion piece wrote: "I’m not opposed to expanding background checks in principle, but what’s the point if no one follows up on the bad actors they expose in the existing system?"

Obama's 23 Imperial Orders sounded so reasonable, don't you agree? To moderate Republicans/'conservatives', how can you not try to save the innocent children?

My question is why Obama/his ilk always SOUND so vague yet so ever-over-reaching?

How does the Ed Morrissey'es of the world think expanding the current background check is agreeable in principle? Should any one else also go through a background check because they might possibly be in your house and thus have slight chance of access to your firearms? to what degree is reasonable to 'save the life of just one child' in Carney's words?

[HomeAtLast]

What if considerable numbers of people stopped paying income tax? Do you think the govt would have time to prosecute them? Or resources? :)

I firmly believe that if people don’t have the guts to organize for the purpose of reining in the govt by withdrawing the revenue, they don’t have the guts to organize to resist gun confiscation (at any speed, it is still pure confiscation). And without organizing, you’ll just get picked off one at a time.