Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysis: Budget Constraints Limit Obama's Second-Term Agenda
http://www.reuters.com/ ^ | January 19,2013 | Andy Sullivan

Posted on 01/19/2013 9:07:36 AM PST by Biggirl

(Reuters) - President Barack Obama starts his second term in office facing unprecedented budget constraints that will challenge his ability to implement his economic vision.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: budget; dc; obama

1 posted on 01/19/2013 9:07:45 AM PST by Biggirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

I’m so sympathetic to him (NOT)


2 posted on 01/19/2013 9:10:25 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
Analysis: Budget Constraints Limit Obama's Second-Term Agenda

When your "agenda" is to destroy the Country, money is no object!

3 posted on 01/19/2013 9:11:23 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (It's not "GUN CONTROL"! It's "PEOPLE CONTROL"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

I doubt the Dems give one little flip about budget constraints. If they had a majority in both houses and the white house, they would be passing trillions in new expenditures and creating new agencies and departments as quickly and boldly as possible.


4 posted on 01/19/2013 9:14:08 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

The absence of a REAL BUDGET shows the Tyrant has
no bounds at all, despite the al Reuters’ nonsense.


5 posted on 01/19/2013 9:14:48 AM PST by Diogenesis (Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
"Spending caps that Obama signed into law in 2011 will make it difficult to boost investment in education, scientific research, transportation and other areas that he says will help the country retool for heightened global competition and rapid technological change, budget experts say."

Investment! LOL!

Here's Obama's economic vision


6 posted on 01/19/2013 9:16:21 AM PST by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

budget constraints??

The SCOTUS gave them the power to mandate what we spend our money own on.


7 posted on 01/19/2013 9:18:30 AM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Budget constraint is an oxymoron in Omamaspeak.


8 posted on 01/19/2013 9:22:38 AM PST by csmusaret (I will give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

That was a battle lost, but I am not so sure a war lost. Obummercare got redefined as a tax, in the grand Roberts cop out. (Four others, including the problematic Kennedy, agreed in opining that there was no way to salvage this hunk of ordure.) But there is a second chance to approach such taxing: not all taxes are constitutional (you couldn’t tax someone for being a Jew, for instance). That issue didn’t get explicitly brought up before the USSC in that infamous case. Look now at what, say, Hobby Lobby is now being “taxed” into doing for the sake of its owners’ faith. There is still a chance for the USSC to do something sane, after having kicked the can an unseemly distance down the road.


9 posted on 01/19/2013 9:34:03 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Not “economic vision”...but “economic nightmare”.

Does anyone have the feeling that nobama sees the rest of us as a smelly substance sticking to the sole of his shoe?


10 posted on 01/19/2013 10:06:09 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

“.....facing unprecedented budget constraints....”

Absolute bullish!t.


11 posted on 01/19/2013 10:19:53 AM PST by Gator113 (Leave my guns alone and REGISTER THE DAMN LIBERALS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Funny line from this article:

” Even as he has pushed through more than $1 trillion in spending increases and tax cuts to fight the deepest recession in 80 years, he has floated deficit-reduction plans that would trim costs over the medium term.”

BWA HA HA HA HA! Not a SINGLE budget proposed by the Assclown has gotten a vote from even DEMOCRATS! And “tax cuts”?? Laughable. The Reuters “journalist” of this piece must be an economic retard.


12 posted on 01/19/2013 11:02:37 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

There is no budget. How can what does not exist be constrained?


13 posted on 01/19/2013 11:48:54 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

You’re right. It is a direct tax on insurance policy ownership status, is not apportioned among the states according to population, and therefore is illegal. But what are the chances it gets struck down? Zero. You and I both know it will be deemed an income tax, and in that world anything goes except something like a Jew Tax like you mention.

There is still the hope it could be struck down on religious grounds of religious freedom. But then they’ll say, hey, the Quakers can’t refuse to pay for taxes that fund wars, so what are you complaining about? You can’t dictate policy from the pulpit. Healthcare is a matter if life and death, blah, blah, blah.

Basically, if Obamacare cab pass because Roberts says, hey, the mandate *could* be a tax, any old reason will do. The mandate was only the most obvious way it was unconstitutional. Did they even hither inquiringly where the Constitution said they nay do whatever else is in the bill? Did they even read the rest of the bill? Doubtful.


14 posted on 01/19/2013 11:58:45 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

This thing is just such a grand counterproductive turkey, that I doubt Roberts would sleep ill if he was brought arguments that it is an unconstitutional tax (the court ordinarily doesn’t look for arguments that have not been furnished to it, which they were not) and agreed with that.

I’ve long suspected that it would be cheaper than the extra costs of Obamacare, just to grant insurance vouchers to the welfare set.


15 posted on 01/19/2013 1:07:05 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Haven’t you heard? The Democrats have a plan for balancing the budget. All the fed has to do is make a trillion dollar platinum coin! Why didn’t anyone think of that before?


16 posted on 01/21/2013 3:51:33 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson