[drpix]

While the US has from its beginning been a “melting pot” of immigration, that pot has been broken since 1987, when for the first time in our history, those who came here illegally were - by policy - legalized rather than removed. Even more have since taken the cue to come and/or stay illegally and by policy they remain to demand yet another Amnesty. To say that the voting demographics of a traditional American “melting pot” legal immigration is changing policy is ignorant or dishonest. To say the policy of legalizing the illegal invaders into citizen is changing voting demographics is the only truth!

As for the election, the change in total popular vote, from 131 million in 2008, to 124 million in 2012, reveals a lose of 7 million voters in 2012. That was what counted in 2012, not the growing Hispanic vote, even when boosted by the unrestricted participation of non-citizens. The 7 million that didn't vote did not come from the Democrat pampered base of Hispanics but from the forgotten non-minority Americans.

By anointing Romney, a go along to get along, no-fight “moderate,” GOP leaders chose to abandon/downplay the positions and issues that would fire-up those forgotten non-minority Americans - who have seen their quality of life continuing to decline under this 3rd world invasion condoned by the elites making national policy.

Instead you propose to “adapt to the reality of the changing demographics” by legalizing even more “undocumented” Democrats into voters who will vote for more policies promoting our national decline. This leaves me wondering if you are really that unaware of our recent “immigration” history or are yourself a closet Democrat.

[chopperjc]

You miss- understood me. I am not advocating for any specific policy. What I am pointing out is demographics. You always have to adapt to current surroundings. My point is the voters haven’t moved in 25 years. The only thing that has changed is the make up of the country.