The Reality That Awaits Women in Combat

The Wall Street Journal ^ | January 23, 2013 | RYAN SMITH

[ansel12]

What combat leader would not want to replace his man warriors with a shorter, lighter, weaker, sicklier, less aggressive, slower moving, more terrain limited, reduced distance traveling, hygienically vulnerable, smaller weight carrying, more prone to injury, version.

He would have to rewrite all the knowledge and experience, of what his troops are capable of and reduce all that accordingly, and simply eliminate some capabilities entirely, but a fair enemy would not seek to capitalize on those advantages of course.

In the meantime, I wonder if Americans have forgotten that if we lose in a major war, we disappear from the future, forever. It seems that many Americans are starting to see war as a sporting event, where you can win or lose, but it doesn’t really change anything.

[x1stcav]

We are sooooo screwed.

[YankeeReb]

Other than hardcore feminists, I can't imagine any woman thinking this is a good thing. The day will come when we need a return to the draft, especially given that the boob in the WH is hollowing out our military and inviting an attack. What will the public think as their daughters are drafted? When the first woman gives birth to a baby with birth defects, or has a miscarriage after being involved in combat, will the lawsuits start flying?

Finally why is this policy pushed through without any discussion whatsoever?

[Chode]

regular yeast and urinary tract infections???

[Michael Barnes]

So does this mean women now have to sign up for selective service at 18?

[RIghtwardHo]

Boy I hate this. I mean, I love the Patriotism but, well ... no.

[donaldo]

I was recently at the Post Office and noted that men reaching the age of eighteen must sign up with the Selective Service System even though the draft isn’t currently in effect. Why aren’t women required to do it? Isn’t this a denial of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? If not, then why not? I’m sure some Democratic feminist can explain the metaphysical subtleties of the situation.

[Jotmo]

Every carton of “Feminine Protection” that is shipped to the front lines is a carton of food or ammo that cannot be.

Or will we require them to go without?

[Viennacon]

One of the most disgusting revelations of a post-constitutional, progressive America. I will sternly advise my sons and future grandsons not to join the military, because it has become a bastardized joke. Gay sex, bestiality, women being raped, tortured, murdered by Muslim savages on the front line!

Can an act of congress block this decision by that slimeball Panetta and his cronies? This is so serious, the House should threaten to suspend military funding until it is reversed. There would be no way out of that one.... oh, wait... EXECUTIVE ORDER! Ain’t having a king great?

[thoolou]

Stupid, stupid, STUPID idea.

[broken_arrow1]

PMS on the battlefield could work to their advantage...

[BipolarBob]

For the women dying to get on the battlefield, now’s your chance!!

[Delta Dawn]

The only consideration for this decision should have been:

Does it make the US military a better fighting force?

A LOT of American fighting people are going to die just so that we can have a female Chairperson of the joint chiefs.

It is no longer about being the best. Politics rules ahead of any other consideration.

Reminds me of the movie, ‘An Officer and A Gentleman’:

So, you wanna fly jets Mayo? My mama wants to fly jets.

[Yardstick]

Other than hardcore feminists, I can't imagine any woman thinking this is a good thing.

But just moments ago I heard ABC radio news report that "women", with no qualifiers and therefore meaning all of womandom, are "celebrating" the announcement. So clearly you must be mistaken.

[Robe]

There is one and only one reason to make changes to the tip of the spear is to add to it's effectiveness. A force multiplier for instance.
This change is about one thing, female promotion possibilities.
This is gonna get people killed, either by guys trying to protect the females, or the lack of abilities on the part of females.
Israel found this out the hard way

[BwanaNdege]

“PMS on the battlefield could work to their advantage...”

Yea, right, now they will just fire in every direction!

[mlizzy]

In my opinion, there is nothing is more beautiful than a strong-willed Christian woman who stands by her man (instead of trying to replace him).

[Lizavetta]

Sexual assaults and rapes are going on in the military right now by American soldiers against American soldiers. The brass cannot or will not stop it.

This will only escalate on the battlefield, in my opinion. Not only that, the focus of the men will be distracted by the women, there will be female "issues", pregnancies, false claims of assault as well as real ones i.e. a clusterf*ck. On top of that the demoralization as female soldiers are captured, tortured, raped, and killed.

Not to mention most women are not as capable. Sorry, they're not. And don't tell me about your 230 pound shot-putting daughter who is more manly than the Incredible Hulk. MOST women are not physically equipped for being warriors.