Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeals court to EPA: ... being a little overly optimistic with the biofuels, there?
Hot Air ^ | January 28, 2013 | Erika Johnsen

Posted on 01/28/2013 1:37:03 PM PST by rusty millet

The Environmental Protection Agency is getting taken to court left and right for their many overzealous regulations and intrusions into private industry, with varying results– but on Friday, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that, why no, the EPA may not punish the oil industry for their noncompliance with the EPA’s lofty Renewable Fuels Standard mandates in failing to blend a certain amount of cellulosic biofuels into their product, seeing as how those biofuels are not actually available.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cellulosicethanol; dnccorruption; dncrico; epa; epafraud; epavsamerica; fairydust; unicorns
Let the truth be known. The science does not exist to produce cellulosic ethanol in appreciable quantities. This area is as crooked as crony payback to "solar" companies".
1 posted on 01/28/2013 1:37:15 PM PST by rusty millet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rusty millet
Pretty sweet gig.

Tell somebody they have to make their product with a non-existent ingredient, then take money away from them when they fail.

That's a business model all Communists could like.

2 posted on 01/28/2013 1:40:00 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rusty millet

They knew fully well it was not achievable and that is exactly why they passed the regulation.

They want to do to oil what they have done to coal.

And don’t for a second believe it is for the environment as the magic negro is making sure energy prices are artificially high so his camel effing buddies can get more of our redistribution income. We have the energy here in fracking, coal, nukes and the communist progressives are doing everything possible to make sure we do not have access to that energy at a reasonable price.

Just like today there is NO solar, wind, skittle pooping unicorns, technology which can replace our traditional energy sources, there is no cellulosic ethanol available on a significant scale.


3 posted on 01/28/2013 1:54:11 PM PST by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rusty millet
Meanwhile back at the ranch the EPA is manipulating international food prices with corn to Alcohol. This gives new meaning to Alcoholics.
4 posted on 01/28/2013 1:55:37 PM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rusty millet

bump


5 posted on 01/28/2013 2:04:50 PM PST by lowbridge (Joe Biden: "Look, the Taliban per se is not our enemy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rusty millet
The science does not exist to produce cellulosic ethanol in appreciable quantities.

Large-scale production of cellulosic ethanol has been "just around the corner" since the time of Henry Ford and Thomas Edison. It remains so today.

Progress has been made, but the energy equation remains negative.

Call me when any biofuel provides a 2:1 or better energy payback on the entire production process.

6 posted on 01/28/2013 2:12:55 PM PST by tpmintx (Gun free zones are hunting preserves for unarmed people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rusty millet

You must use Unobtanium in your products or pay the fines.........


7 posted on 01/28/2013 2:33:10 PM PST by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rusty millet

Bush 43 even mentioned this in his SOU one year. Nothing has happened since.

It was always a longshot. Not only does the conversion process have to scale economically, the disruption due to land and water use constraints were hardly thought out. Then there’s the EPA constraint on a major shift on land and water use. Then there’s the potential objection from elitists.

Remember, windmills and solar are OK as long as the view from elitist property is not marred.

We can’t even get an oil pipeline through Nebraska.


8 posted on 01/28/2013 3:17:02 PM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson