Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Republicans Should Welcome Chuck Hagel To The Pentagon's Top Job
Forbes ^ | Jan 7 2013 | Loren Thompson

Posted on 01/28/2013 9:48:57 PM PST by WilliamIII

Politics is said to make strange bedfellows, but the opposition of some Republicans to Chuck Hagel’s nomination as Secretary of Defense is downright surreal. The former two-term Republican Senator from Nebraska is President Obama’s choice to run the Pentagon for the next four years.

Over the next several weeks you’ll be hearing arguments from the likes of Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and other prominent Republicans that Hagel doesn’t measure up to conservative standards for serving as the nation’s top military official. However, the more you scrutinize Hagel’s resume, the more you have to wonder whether anyone could meet those standards if he can’t. Chuck Hagel’s nomination is a gift to Republicans, and they ought to take a closer look at the qualities he would bring to the Pentagon’s fabled E-Ring before assailing his suitability to serve.

Since the Republican Party at its core is mainly about domestic politics and values, I’m going to put the caisson ahead of the horse here by speaking first about Hagel’s accomplishments as a politician. When Chuck Hagel won his initial run for the Senate in 1996, he was the first Republican to accomplish that feat in the Cornhusker State in a quarter-century. His reelection bid six years later was so successful — he garnered 83% of the vote — that no other politician in Nebraska’s history had ever won statewide office by such a lopsided margin. When’s the last time you heard of a Republican senatorial candidate doing so well in a contested election?

If you think that Hagel engineered his election wins by being a mealy-mouthed centrist, guess again. In the Senate, he favored school prayer, missile defense and drilling in Alaska while opposing abortion, same-sex marriage and limits on assault guns.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/28/2013 9:49:03 PM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

On the one hand this seems disingenuous. Hagel won’t be opposing abortion on military bases if he’s working for Obama. Or gays in the military. On the other hand, some of his “conservative” critics aren’t that concerned about those issues, either.


2 posted on 01/28/2013 9:52:25 PM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

If Forbes loves Hagel so much why don’t they give him a job as CEO. That way they would only be advocating screwing themselves instead of the whole nation!


3 posted on 01/28/2013 9:53:42 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
Since the Republican Party at its core is mainly about domestic politics and values …
Oh brother. Another attempt to paint conservatives (never mind the GOP) as jingoistic isolationists, while failing to define the opposition. Never mind trying to induce them to look the other way while an open antisemite gets appointed to the top position in the country’s defense.
So Republicans should see Chuck Hagel’s nomination for what it is: an unexpected gift that would install one of their own in the Obama Administration’s top cabinet job. …
And just why does the esteemed author think Obama wants him in that job? If Hagel represented anything that was against Obama and his agenda, we would never have heard a single thing about this man. (Oh yes, all Republicans are the same and Hagel is “one of their own”.) Appending a barf alert . . .
4 posted on 01/28/2013 9:56:39 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
So Republicans should see Chuck Hagel’s nomination for what it is: an unexpected gift that would install one of their own in the Obama Administration’s top cabinet job.

If only the author were honest. Even within such a brief article, it is clear that Chuck Hagel today is not the same Chuck Hagel that was originally elected Senator in 1996. The dear soul came to Washington...and "grew".

He "grew" so much, in fact, that after being re-elected with a rousing 83% majority in 2002, he couldn't have been elected dogcatcher in Grand Island in 2008. Which is why Chuck Hagel chose to retire, rather than stand for re-election again.

"One of their own"? Hardly. At least, not anymore.

In a party where national security has always been a guiding strength, Chuck Hagel is the SOD who would happily hollow out the force and leave it fit for ceremonial duties only.

5 posted on 01/28/2013 10:15:05 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

If Zero wants him... that’s all I need to know.

TT


6 posted on 01/28/2013 11:07:23 PM PST by TexasTransplant (This needs to go viral http://vimeo.com/52009124 please watch it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
The GOP lost the election. Romney is not picking the Secretary Obama is although I suspect Romney might have picked him also....

Given who is the POTUS I'll take a grunt and decorated combat Veteran over probably any other choice O would have made..

7 posted on 01/28/2013 11:12:05 PM PST by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

This country is finished. We’ll struggle on another 20 or 30 years before
the final collapse.

When I heard the Boy Scouts will accept gay men as leaders I knew
we are at the end of our America.


8 posted on 01/29/2013 12:52:49 AM PST by ChiMark (America no more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiMark

When I saw tanks and helo’s at Waco, I knew this country was done for....live on TV.....may they all go to hell for murdering women and children...


9 posted on 01/29/2013 1:09:35 AM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
And why shouldn't they, for they are as bent and corrupt as he is....

Not to mention useless, traitorous as they're counterparts on the left, even thought they are left of right (the repubs)

10 posted on 01/29/2013 2:43:32 AM PST by SERE_DOC ( “The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” TJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goat granny
When I saw tanks and helo’s at Waco, I knew this country was done for....live on TV.....may they all go to hell for murdering women and children...

Ditto. And remember, it was wildly popular. R.I.P. America.

11 posted on 01/29/2013 3:01:43 AM PST by Forgotten Amendments (I remember when a President having an "enemies list" was a scandal. Now, they have a kill list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Forgotten Amendments

And lets not forget Ruby Ridge and the Weaver family.


12 posted on 01/29/2013 3:46:49 AM PST by greenhornet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

The WHOLE IDEA behind this mess is to have someone with the ‘R’ behind his name to get the blame for the military’s destruction.

‘Twas all due to them there Republicns, you see.


13 posted on 01/29/2013 4:30:14 AM PST by Flintlock (H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greenhornet68
And lets not forget Ruby Ridge and the Weaver family.

For me, I didn't give up hope until Elian. When the country CHEERED that storm trooper sticking a machine gun in a 6 year old's face ... FWIW, my flag went into the attic that day and has never flown again.

14 posted on 01/29/2013 8:04:54 AM PST by Forgotten Amendments (I remember when a President having an "enemies list" was a scandal. Now, they have a kill list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Forgotten Amendments
Ah, yes! Such brave young men. I wonder if these guys would ever fire on or disarm US citizens?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

15 posted on 01/29/2013 12:23:34 PM PST by greenhornet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson