Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Gripen Proposition for the Dutch Air Force
Saab’s Gripen blog ^ | Feb. 3, 2013

Posted on 02/04/2013 11:51:41 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

The Gripen Proposition for the Dutch Air Force

(Source: Saab’s Gripen blog; posted Feb. 3, 2013)

2013 will be an exciting year for the Dutch Air Force and for Dutch politics. The reason: there is a decision to be taken on the new fighter to replace the outdated F-16s, says a report in Een Vandaag.

In a report that looks at the various options that are on offer, Kimo Demoed of Een Vandaag says that while the U.S. F-35 was the dream candidate for the Dutch Air Force for years, the JSF project is anything but smooth: "The costs are skyrocketing, there are numerous technical problems and the performance of the aircraft is disappointing."

Een Vandaag's reports on the changed gameplan on the replacement of the F-16 in the year of the decision, quoting Dick Zandee, former political adviser MoD and NATO, now working at Clingendael, who says that the F16 replacement puts the government under serious duress: "The JSF will cost more than 100 million E, and I believe this cost will increase. Social Democrats are against the JSF and the Liberals want it. This could become a serious political crisis."

The Swedish Saab Gripen is an alternative and Eddy de la Motte, Head of Gripen Export, says, "We can provide an unbeatable offer in terms of capability of the aircraft, fixed price and fixed schedule."

According to Dick Zandee (Clingendael), "the real question is, how much do you want to pay for this extra JSF capability? There are other good alternatives out there, like the Saab Gripen, that are capable and suit our needs for half the price. When we go for the JSF we can never afford four squadrons and that makes it difficult to conduct missions around the globe."

Zandee goes on saying: "Other Western countries are flying Gripen, Rafale or Eurofighter, I do not get the feeling that these countries are in danger because they fly European products. I urge the politicians to answer the question: What do we really need to be able do in the air? And not: What is the best aircraft money can buy?"

Eddy de la Motte points out, "We tried to make this aircraft good in a lot of ways: good to buy, good to maintain. It will live for 40 years, it can be updated, very flexible and we will provide you with the technology so that you can update it yourself. I think it is pretty much established that we are the most cost effective fighter."

According to in Een Vandaag, "While others are making progress, the JSF is troubled with a lot of problems. The American MoD made a long list with recurring problems: test schedule falls behind, software problems, safety systems falter, stealth not working, acceleration and manoeuvrability are disappointing."

Eddy de la Motte points out that the Gripen offers force multipliers that give it the edge. "You can operate the Gripen from an ordinary 800 metre piece of straight road. Landing, taking off and do rearming in less than 10 minutes. You can change the engine in less than one hour outside with 5 guys."

According to Een Vandaag, "In 2008 Saab made the Dutch an offer for 85, based on that number it will cost 56.4 million. The price of the JSF is unclear. We now estimate it at around 100/110 million.

-ends-


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; gripen; jsf; netherlands

1 posted on 02/04/2013 11:51:49 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They need the F-35 to protect themselves. The Gripen will never stand up to the next time the Germans decide to invade the low countries...


2 posted on 02/04/2013 11:56:56 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

I thought Germany already bought the Low Countries.


3 posted on 02/04/2013 12:04:14 PM PST by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The Saab is slow, had a huge radar signature, short range, and lacks 360 shoot down capability. On the other hand, at least you can get it in the air.

http://www.businessinsider.com/the-f-35b-grounded-exploding-lightning-fuel-tank-2013-1

4 posted on 02/04/2013 12:20:29 PM PST by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
"I thought Germany already bought the Low Countries."

No, they're in the process of buying the southern EU starting with Greece. Historically, they've found it easier and cheaper to just invade the low countries and take them over. They especially want to get a hold of the Dutch. Knock off the Belgium beer. Their biggest competition.
5 posted on 02/04/2013 12:48:43 PM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Whoops, I meant knock off the Belgiums to take out the Belgium beer market. Not the Dutch...


6 posted on 02/04/2013 12:49:59 PM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

US aerospace takes another bite in the Obama.

F35 design and test should have been frozen and the plane fielded years ago.


7 posted on 02/04/2013 1:22:47 PM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

I was told that 80% of all crude from the E hemisphere is brokered through Bussles.


8 posted on 02/04/2013 1:27:49 PM PST by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hattend

agreed...

I compare the F-35 to K-Mart....

By attempting to offer the customer everything, they actually succeed at offering the customer nothing...

The theory of the multirole aircraft is an outdated 1950’s thought process. Here it is in a nutshell..

air superiority aircraft obtain air superiority..

Fighters fight..

attack aircraft attack..

bombers bomb..

ground support aircraft support ground troops..

tankers refuel..

transports transport..

The F-35 is supposed to do all this????

Can you say F-111???


9 posted on 02/05/2013 4:22:49 AM PST by joe fonebone (The clueless... they walk among us, and they vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson