Each of these people, including Akin, stood for lower taxes and a limited government. The fact that any of them lost their election does not equate to their supporters believing “stupid stuff.”
What it does prove is that cowards run from those who support their core beliefs if a candidate makes a single misstatement on an ancillary topic that the MSM blows out of proportion. Well, either that is true, or perhaps those people who most promote a rational economic theory such as Austrian economics are otherwise devoid of rational thought elsewhere in their lives.
Which is it?
I'm “sickofRINOS.”
The difference between Cruz and those two crackpots you claim you gave money to (and still cant learn the obvious) is that Akin and Angle blew easy elections for no valid reason, just being stupid.
It doesnt matter if you like what you thought they stand for because they are not in office, in the Senate, Reid and that hog are in the Senate instead of them because they are so stupid they lost easy wins for no good reason.
If you are going to give money to losers like them you might as well be honest with yourself and become a Democrat.
I am sick-of-those-who-help-libs.
Because Obama and Reid are destroying this country and Angle, Akin and Mourdock were key to getting him where they are now.
Romney did the same as them with his 47%. He is the same as them in my eyes, a loser.
If you love O you should love them. I don't. Following losers just gets you more losing.
And many really want that, they love the cult feeling of bathing in victim hood and endless losing and 'everyone against us'. They cant get enough of it.
Your accusing me of being a Romney supporter was very entertaining. Better yet a Rover supporter, yep, I just look back fondly at GWB era , right guys ???? LOL
Akin was my pick in that primary. A FRiend was warning he was not ready for prime time. I argued about him with it “why isn’t Akin a first tier candidate?” but he turned out to be right.
He flat out cost us a seat by refusing to quit after he was no longer viable (the reason why he couldn’t win is irrelevant, he couldn’t win so he should’ve quit, he could have had a future, now his career is an elected official is over)
Those of in the know warned about Angle because of her history of losing races. Like when she lost a GOP House primary and whined for a re-vote (not a recount). Sue Lowden or Danny Tarkainian would be in the Senate right now. But Angle conned enough people for her to win the primary.
Mourdock is different cause he was running against an elderly RINO incumbent and as a twice elected State Treasurer who would have thought he’d run such a lousy race? Very disappointing.