Posted on 02/06/2013 6:40:27 AM PST by Uncle Chip
March 20, 2012
@1:01 “…the young woman’s parents asked that we not use her name…”
Why be asked to not use her name if they didn’t know it?
If I’m not mistaken, the Florida courts’ disciplinary branch would do the investigation if one were done. It’s the FL courts that grant lawyers the license to practice in their venues after passing the bar exam (or by reciprocity with another state). And its the courts that oversee professional conduct/discipline. If the investigative body recommends suspension or disbarment, it would have to go thru the state’s supreme court.
If by a miracle Zimmerman is acquitted by the jury in spite of all the jury-tampering by the media and the President, Holder is sure to go after him on civil charges.
As the lie becomes more obvious, the MSM loses interest in Trayvon. They don’t care that they’ve destroyed Zimmerman’s life.
Way old enough to have an abortion without parental consent, according to the Democrats.
I think it’s been stated before, but I believe this whole Zimmerman thing is to set the precedent of
“thou shalt not defend thyself from black thugs”.
I think they are particularly trying to get rid of the "Stand Your Ground" law although it really isn't applicable to this case--Zimmerman never had the option of retreating as far as I can tell from the reports.
Florida Kangaroo Court ping.
Nothing about this in the South Florida “Poor St. Trayvon of Sanford” media.
Admit to being confused. Aside from the false Dee Dee, do they have a witness named Dee Dee, was she on the phone with Trayvon during the incident? Does she have that phone number do the records match, etc?
I know I read Facebook or tweets or something of the girl who knew Trayvon but obviously not as closely as Crump’s made up story.
Crump lied because he needed Z indicted and better yet convicted, to sue for money. But is there a real witness now?
Well that's just great taking into consideration the make up of the Florida courts. I googled and found that the first three Florida Supremes were appointed by Lawton Chiles and the rest were appointed by Charlie Crist. Technically they are Republicans, but they would be Crist republicans. Don't know about the makeup of the disciplinary branch, but it's a good guess they're corrupt to the bone too IMO. Thank for the information.
I’m not a lawyer, but have seen how the process works in DC and assume those general outlines carry true in other states. Assuming that’s the case, the states’ highest courts themselves only have input after the investigation/ hearings/ appeals, etc. are concluded.
If no compromise has been reached the supreme court would hold a hearing and then rule. It can be a lengthy (and costly) process. Most lawyers, if the prosecutors at the disciplinary branch have irrefutable goods on them, will go for some sort of compromise settlement.
IMO, what was done here warrants disbarment, not just a slap on the hand. But Crump has the $$$ to fight charges to drag out the proceedings until he got an offer that he could accept, OR would assume that he could take a short-term suspension and let the firm carry on without him for the suspension’s duration, bringing in the $$$. That assumes the disciplinary body chooses to pursue him.
Mark Omara Press Conference Right After the Pre-trial Hearing - Feb 5, 2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=GwwXM349fh0
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.