Posted on 02/09/2013 6:36:16 AM PST by Brandonmark
I don’t know if I’d be so quick to label him a black racist. One of the paragraphs in the manifesto, I believe, was a tirade against black supervisors who harassed white cops beneath them in revenge for past injustices, thus creating another generation of racist white cops. That at least suggests an awareness that it cuts both ways.
In short a person must know what things are racist in order to be NOT racist. Ignorance is racism.
For example, it is not racist to point out that blacks have done a terrible job managing Zimbabwe, even though all the Marxists and Socialists on the planet will scream that it is. On the other hand it is racist to claim that Zimbabwe is well managed and better off than white run Rhodesia, EVEN if the assertion comes from from absolute ignorance of the facts. The indoctrination necessary made the person a racist even though they don't know it themselves.
Dorner is this type of racist at least, or worse, and the convincing fact is his rabid support and promotion of gun control, as American gun control has always been primarily aimed and specifically created for the disarmament and subjugation of American Black citizens, and Dorner is ignorant of that fact.
PS Marxists and Obama supporters are racist, too.
Yes, he is not a Christian, and is heavy into vengeance. This is the norm for human action for thousands of years. Most of the world today acts on the same motives.
Read the ancient sagas, from the Iliad and Odyssey to the Norse sagas, and Germanic Operas. Vengeance is a powerful human motivator.
When you make up your own definitions, I guess anyone is anything you want them to be.
You are one of few who understand his motive and the fact he is not crazy. I think it's easy for people to dismiss this with “he's crazy, he's a nut case”, etc., rather than try to understand what is really going on with him. I am a psychological examiner and know this man is not crazy but most on here talking about him, don't believe me - again, it's easier to fluff it off as “he's nuts”.
OK, then let's use the Democrat definition, they make up their own all the time: No black person can be racist.
That makes you correct in your challenge.
Now you can lay out the facts and logic that support that definition, as I did mine.
Or not, your choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.