Besides being our most noble emperor,he’s a professor of law! How could he POSSIBLY have missed the message???/sarcasm;)
The Lying POS who resides at 1600 Penn Ave. has decided he will unilaterally reduce our nukes to 900 (for now) without a treaty or Senate approval on the action. By “informal agreement” with the Russians. Nuts.
Now, what does the Constitution say about nukes? See how evil Obozo is.
Commie Dems: “We don’t need no stinkin Laws!”
And where are those in DC defending the nation as they swore in their oath of office?
Remember the part about “protect and defend the Constitution”?
Sorry I failed to post the link:
Obama to Renew Drive for Cuts in Nuclear Arms (ours)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2987270/posts
“In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a ‘shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length’ at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.”
~United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)
Mabe he is shooting the skeet while the clay is still in the launcher?
>>The president and his allies seem to have missed the message<<
Elmer Fudd didn’t miss the message; he does what he damn well pleases. NOBODY is willing to call him out; so he keeps on ignoring the Constitution, the courts and anybody who stands up to him.
We are still waiting to resume drilling in the Gulf, after a judge ordered that Elmer Fudd had no authority to stop the drilling. Oil companies are too afraid; wildcatters are too afraid; everybody is too afraid.
Welcome to Acirema, land of the enslaved and home of the cowardly.
The courts would no more allow government to undermine the Second Amendment than the First.
I wonder where these little bad boys fall...
http://www.racembac.com/bowmag.html
If I lived in Chicago or New York a crossbow with a few of these would be a good home defense option.
“The courts would no more allow government to undermine the Second Amendment than the First.”
If this is the case, then why, since at the very least Sandy Hook, has no one from the Supreme Court explained to the “dear leader” that this agenda, this campaign, to infringe upon the citizens is non-Constitutional, and therefore NOT going to be certified by the court...
Much less the people, who WILL (and are choosing to) resist, and are already opposing this agenda...
I find the silence to be more damning, than supportive of its just potential, to stave off these oppressions...
It does illustrate, that the opposistion to our liberties is hedging its bets that we (at least some of us) will fight back with every means at our disposal...
What a poor (and sad) decision on their part...
Baby Talk - Do low fertility rates spell economic collapse?
The Root Cause of Gun Violence
Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.