Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/10/2013 9:46:13 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Besides being our most noble emperor,he’s a professor of law! How could he POSSIBLY have missed the message???/sarcasm;)


2 posted on 02/10/2013 9:57:52 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The Lying POS who resides at 1600 Penn Ave. has decided he will unilaterally reduce our nukes to 900 (for now) without a treaty or Senate approval on the action. By “informal agreement” with the Russians. Nuts.

Now, what does the Constitution say about nukes? See how evil Obozo is.

Commie Dems: “We don’t need no stinkin Laws!”

And where are those in DC defending the nation as they swore in their oath of office?

Remember the part about “protect and defend the Constitution”?


3 posted on 02/10/2013 10:00:01 PM PST by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Sorry I failed to post the link:

Obama to Renew Drive for Cuts in Nuclear Arms (ours)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2987270/posts


4 posted on 02/10/2013 10:08:19 PM PST by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a ‘shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length’ at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.”
~United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)


5 posted on 02/10/2013 10:08:26 PM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Mabe he is shooting the skeet while the clay is still in the launcher?


7 posted on 02/10/2013 10:16:22 PM PST by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The bottom line is that the federal government has no Constitutional authority to make any law concerning firearms or weapons of any kind and that includes background checks. In fact, the Constitution expressly forbids it from making such laws in the Second Amendment

Furthermore, if the Fourteenth Amendment applies the Bill of Rights to the states as most liberals claim, then state governments are prohibited from making such laws also.
14 posted on 02/11/2013 2:04:00 AM PST by DangerZone (If the left had their way, all of America would be as safe as Sandy Hook Elementary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

>>The president and his allies seem to have missed the message<<

Elmer Fudd didn’t miss the message; he does what he damn well pleases. NOBODY is willing to call him out; so he keeps on ignoring the Constitution, the courts and anybody who stands up to him.

We are still waiting to resume drilling in the Gulf, after a judge ordered that Elmer Fudd had no authority to stop the drilling. Oil companies are too afraid; wildcatters are too afraid; everybody is too afraid.

Welcome to Acirema, land of the enslaved and home of the cowardly.


19 posted on 02/11/2013 4:05:15 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The courts would no more allow government to undermine the Second Amendment than the First.


But.....but.....but that was back before the courts were stacked by a liberal Congress pandering to the will of Marxist presidents.


20 posted on 02/11/2013 4:10:49 AM PST by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I wonder where these little bad boys fall...

http://www.racembac.com/bowmag.html

If I lived in Chicago or New York a crossbow with a few of these would be a good home defense option.


23 posted on 02/11/2013 5:02:50 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; All

“The courts would no more allow government to undermine the Second Amendment than the First.”

If this is the case, then why, since at the very least Sandy Hook, has no one from the Supreme Court explained to the “dear leader” that this agenda, this campaign, to infringe upon the citizens is non-Constitutional, and therefore NOT going to be certified by the court...

Much less the people, who WILL (and are choosing to) resist, and are already opposing this agenda...

I find the silence to be more damning, than supportive of its just potential, to stave off these oppressions...

It does illustrate, that the opposistion to our liberties is hedging its bets that we (at least some of us) will fight back with every means at our disposal...

What a poor (and sad) decision on their part...


25 posted on 02/11/2013 5:10:08 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
Mark Landsbaum: Don't panic about global warming

Baby Talk - Do low fertility rates spell economic collapse?

The War Against Black Men

The Root Cause of Gun Violence

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

42 posted on 02/11/2013 12:24:40 PM PST by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson