Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women in Ground Combat - How did it happen? And what will it do to the military?
The American Interest ^ | January 28, 2013 | BING WEST

Posted on 02/12/2013 7:57:16 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2013 7:57:20 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Good article


2 posted on 02/12/2013 8:05:57 PM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
'Females in combat' will drive down heterosexual female enlistments. 0bama's 'openly gay military' will drive down heterosexual male enlistments.

Result: Bull dykes and flamboyant fag soldiers that do whatever President Gaybama tells them to, including firing upon the evil heterosexual masses.

3 posted on 02/12/2013 8:07:50 PM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (PRISON AT BENGHAZI?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.” SecDef Gates on Diversity after the Ft Hood shooting.

Symbolic of how these assclowns think.


4 posted on 02/12/2013 8:10:22 PM PST by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

When billets for the service academies were opened to women, I said than and was reinforced in my belief by a female officer that this would inevitably result in this present insanity.


5 posted on 02/12/2013 8:13:03 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Sending and promoting our Mothers, daughters, wives and sisters to the front lines is a sign of a sick society.

Instead of honoring these women we willingly send them out to die.......

it's absolutely insane.

6 posted on 02/12/2013 8:17:32 PM PST by Kakaze (I want The Republic back !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

7 posted on 02/12/2013 8:24:55 PM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (PRISON AT BENGHAZI?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I briefly thought that maybe, just maybe, the Chiefs were trying to make the best of a bad situation. That maybe they knew Obama would force this change on them whether they wanted it or not, and that they thought it best to get out in front of it and limit the damage. I based these thoughts mostly on the rarely mentioned part of announced change that said the services could, after a review, still prohibit women from certain positions if it was determined they were unfit for them. I thought maybe the Chairman was thinking that maybe the Army and Marine infantry units doing most of the brutal fighting would, in the end, remain all male.

I also foolishly (kind of) believe Panetta when he said that standards would not be lowered. If this were true, then very few women would ever make it.

But then Chairman Dempsey quickly squashed such illusions when he uttered what is quoted in the article about how the services would have to defend high standards that women can’t meet. Then when asked directly about it on Meet the Press, the Chairman said that they would ‘have the right standards for the right jobs.’ I think its a safe bet that the ‘right’ standards will be ones that are low enough to allow enough women in the infantry to satisfy the wishes of people like Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi. So its pretty clear now. The Chairman is saying that standards will absolutely be lowered.

Its a shame that the GOP is so worthless. Public support for this move is built on a lie that standards won’t be lowered. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is all but saying the standards will be lowered. And Republicans are nearly silent. Yeah, there is the proposal to pass a law forbidding the lowering of standards, but even if it passed the House, it would go nowhere in the Senate and would be vetoed by Obama even if it did.

If we’re lucky we won’t fight any more wars so we won’t ever discover just how bad an idea this is.


8 posted on 02/12/2013 8:25:30 PM PST by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

There will be nothing that comes out of this that makes the armed forces more capable or better than they were before. Not one thing.


9 posted on 02/12/2013 8:27:11 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Pritchett

No, that ghastly and stunning quote was from General Casey.

It’s amazing really. He said that if the military were to have less diversity in general, and fewer Muslims specifically, would be worse than the slaughter of all those innocent people. This should be an infamous quote, and he should be ridiculed for it. But I’ll bet few have ever even heard it. The GOP is simply worthless in opposing the cult of Diversity.


10 posted on 02/12/2013 8:29:53 PM PST by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
“The very nature of women disqualifies them from doing it (killing so brutally),” Barrow said. “Women give life sustain life, nurture life; they don’t take it.”

Clearly, the General never saw a ghetto.

11 posted on 02/12/2013 8:36:15 PM PST by Old Sarge (We are officially over the precipice, we just havent struck the ground yet...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

And in these coming times, that may not be a bad thing!


12 posted on 02/12/2013 8:37:34 PM PST by Patriot365
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

it is not about women in combat or even women in ground combat. it is about women in combat UNITS. this lack of correct terminology is right up there with assault weapons. women have been in ground combat. i do not want them in ground combat units.


13 posted on 02/12/2013 8:43:24 PM PST by bravo whiskey (“People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It makes all of our daughter eligible for draft registration, and any future draft. The only thing keeping them out, were court rulings to the effect that since women were barred by law from combat roles, they were not required to be included in any draft.


14 posted on 02/12/2013 8:52:16 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Pritchett
Not Gates but the Chief of Staff of the US Army, General Casey. His father died a hero in Viet Nam his son became a zero at the Pentagon.
15 posted on 02/12/2013 9:29:18 PM PST by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aetius

‘If we’re lucky we won’t fight any more wars so we won’t ever discover just how bad an idea this is.’

The Fates and the Furies are rolling about in laughter over that one. Congrats, you are a first time Hit parade winner on Olympus.


16 posted on 02/12/2013 9:33:11 PM PST by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Aetius; robowombat

Oops, thanks for the correction. I am reading a book about planning for OIF and had Gates and Casey on the brain.


17 posted on 02/12/2013 9:54:54 PM PST by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Starship troopers lays out the “pro” case rather well. ;p


18 posted on 02/12/2013 10:47:11 PM PST by Impy (All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
Is There a 'Positive Right' to Own Firearms?

And Your Little Dog, Too (It’s time to control the government’s guns)

Letter to Senator Cruz on constitutional issues in federal gun control proposals

Al Nusrah front spearheads capture of Syrian dam, claims suicide assault

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

19 posted on 02/12/2013 10:58:26 PM PST by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
Is There a 'Positive Right' to Own Firearms?

And Your Little Dog, Too (It’s time to control the government’s guns)

Letter to Senator Cruz on constitutional issues in federal gun control proposals

Al Nusrah front spearheads capture of Syrian dam, claims suicide assault

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

20 posted on 02/12/2013 10:59:27 PM PST by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson