Posted on 02/12/2013 8:07:39 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Sen. Marco Rubio may be giving the Republican response to the president’s State of the Union address this evening and Sen. Rand Paul is giving the Tea Party response, but why wait until the president is done speaking? Sarah Palin is live tweeting her response and well she doesn’t like it.
Of course that’s no surprise, but she also created her own hashtag #sotUGottaBKiddingMe
She began by countering the president’s claim at the beginning of his speech that “there is much progress to report.”
Sarah Palin✔ @SarahPalinUSA
Obama: “There is much progress to report.” Oh really? Let's see what the facts show... #sotUGottaBKiddingMe
2:17 AM - 13 Feb 13
404 Retweets 149 favorites
She then tweeted some numbers with her hashtag including “22.7 million Americans are unemployed, underemployed, or have given up looking for work” and “$5.9 million was added to the national debt since Obama took office.”
She then started live tweeting in earnest. When the president mentioned stopping the looming automatic defense cuts also known as the sequester, she again blamed the president.
Sarah Palin✔ @SarahPalinUSA
Keep in mind that the sequester was Obama’s baby. He signed it into law. Now he thinks it’s economic Armageddon. #sotUGottaBKiddingMe
2:22 AM - 13 Feb 13
628 Retweets 136 favorites
And then she began explaining what she thought the president truly means. When Obama said most Americans “know that broad-based economic growth requires a balanced approach to deficit reduction, with spending cuts and revenue, and with everybody doing their fair share,” she wasn’t having it...
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
Can you post a credible link to Palin stating that, or is that just more Palinhater bullsh*t?
(Pssst! What makes you think it’s a man?)
Tweet tweet LOL
I enjoyed reading her tweets. Sarah Palin has to know her stuff to tweet all those facts in real time.
What a stunning reply. A rebuttal worthy of the great Churchill himself, I'd say.
Sicko, you're outdoing yourself tonight. I sit in utter awe of your tongue lashing abilities!
(gag...)
1. Let’s “invest” in more “clean energy” because Obama has a lot of campaign bundlers to thank #cronycapitalismonsteroids #sotUGottaBeKiddingMe
2. SarahPalinUSA: Stagnant economy, Greek-style debt, inflation, no jobs, high gas prices. What say you, Obama voters? #OBuyersRemorse? #sotUGottaBKiddingMe
Re-read the comment. It wasn't her that said that it was the subject of my comments, hint hint
Tweet, tweet
So can you post a link to someone credible that did, or are you just FOS?
Crony capital is monsteroids?
Solid analysis by Sarah, as usual.
Levi, isn’t it past your bed time yet?
Not as sharp as your abilities to predict the future, I am in awe myself:
Comment Subtitle : 'Only a fool cant see that Sarah is running.' (Windbag)
Funny how even certified ruling class establishment RINOs like Karl Rove can see that Palin’s running, but some long-tenured Freepers can't.
It fairly boggles the mind.
#411 posted on Saturday, August 20, 2011 7:02:43 PM by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
HA-HA, Windbag's keen perceptions. Tell the truth that Sarah was running.
Comment Subtitle :” It would be catastrophic if Sarah didn’t announce on Sept 3”(Windbag)
There's just too much hoopla going on about everything Sarah's been up to in the last week or so. Everything she's done has fueled the speculation that September 3rd is the big day. I don't think there's anything they can do to quell the anticipation now. …….
Can you imagine what's going to happen if she doesn't announce then? Heartbreak city all across the US, and a big “I told ya so” from all of her enemies and doubters.
It would be catastrophic, in my opinion.
#64 posted on Saturday, August 20, 2011 12:10:36 AM by Windflier
catastrophic??? LOL, not to brain-dead zombies like you.
Comment Subtitle : “Sarah must announce on Sept 3”(Windbag)
Of all people, Sarah knows how much is riding on what she says on September 3rd. She knows that she can't just breeze through her speech without tackling the question head on. The pat answer, “I'm still considering it” will not fly in Indianola, and she knows it. ….
I'm sure that Sarah is looking at this, and has already realized that events have moved into such a position that she must announce on the 3rd, then shift into a whole new battle strategy.
#156 posted on Saturday, August 20, 2011 1:48:43 AM by Windflier
Yes, she MUST, she must! LOL, but if she doesn't we will repeat the same lines in a year.
Way past my bedtime, but I love you folks. You are a blast:)
It was. Or were you one of the people that thought Romney was a good idea?
Cuz.. you know...that’s what all the PDS and trashing of other actual conservatives by you and yours led directly to. A liberal vs. liberal election. Anf gee whiz brain donor, just look at what all that hard work ‘won’.
Now its my fault she decided not to run just because I was posting on the Palin threads that she is not running?
So Palin read my comments saying she isn't running and said “If SOL says I am not running I cant run” then we got Romney.
??? HA-HA,
BTW: one of your Palinista buddies I see on this thread was a Romney supporter unlike me, but that's OK with you cos he's drinkin the Koolaid.
Nope, Lake and I have had many a heated battle over Romney.
If you do not think trashing conservative candidates all across the net adds up, that it does not feed the left or the RINO wing to move ever leftward, you are even dumber than you post. Or dumber THAN A post. Either way works.
Candidates?? What the hell are you talking about?
What conservative candidates?
I’m talking about photosynthesis in cave fungus...DUH....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.