You do know that's not Sarah, right? ...
Posted on 02/12/2013 8:07:39 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Sen. Marco Rubio may be giving the Republican response to the president’s State of the Union address this evening and Sen. Rand Paul is giving the Tea Party response, but why wait until the president is done speaking? Sarah Palin is live tweeting her response and well she doesn’t like it.
Of course that’s no surprise, but she also created her own hashtag #sotUGottaBKiddingMe
She began by countering the president’s claim at the beginning of his speech that “there is much progress to report.”
Sarah Palin✔ @SarahPalinUSA
Obama: “There is much progress to report.” Oh really? Let's see what the facts show... #sotUGottaBKiddingMe
2:17 AM - 13 Feb 13
404 Retweets 149 favorites
She then tweeted some numbers with her hashtag including “22.7 million Americans are unemployed, underemployed, or have given up looking for work” and “$5.9 million was added to the national debt since Obama took office.”
She then started live tweeting in earnest. When the president mentioned stopping the looming automatic defense cuts also known as the sequester, she again blamed the president.
Sarah Palin✔ @SarahPalinUSA
Keep in mind that the sequester was Obama’s baby. He signed it into law. Now he thinks it’s economic Armageddon. #sotUGottaBKiddingMe
2:22 AM - 13 Feb 13
628 Retweets 136 favorites
And then she began explaining what she thought the president truly means. When Obama said most Americans “know that broad-based economic growth requires a balanced approach to deficit reduction, with spending cuts and revenue, and with everybody doing their fair share,” she wasn’t having it...
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
What candidate are you referring to?, its less than 6 after the reelection.
Look, the zombies had their make believe POTUS run for well over a year. This election has proved that make believe candidates who never intend on running cannot beat Democrats who do run.
Its a fact.
It’s also a fact that everyone who looks into runni9ng with things like steering and building infrastructure toward a possible run committees is called a ‘candidate’.
Now if you want to argue the semantics of the word, feel free. But your multi year history of trashing Palin still leaves what positive conservative end you think that will accomplish.
Better yet, as you have been asked and never answered for YEARS now, which of her positions do you disagree with and why?
As for Lakeshark, I think he and I can set aside our contempt for each other long enough to show you for what you are.
It was you who accused me of supporting Romney on this thread.
So? At least Lake and I agree on Palin. So how about telling us which of her positions offends you so?
Can’t do it without sharing a view with MSNBC?
contempt for each other ....LOL
I think i like you :)
Candidates?? This still gets me., I was having a field day with Trump (Trumps chumps) here last year. It was the most fun. Those fools thought he was running though it was obvious he wasnt.
I don't trash ‘conservative candidates’.
I make fun of those who foolishly follow imaginary candidates. I make fun of fools.
No imaginary candidate will beat a real Democrat one. Its a fact.
Its not going to work again. Too many care that they were burned. You folks need someone fresh.
I’ll reply tomorrow.
If you haven’t given us a solid conservative reason to trash Palin by then I’ll assume it’s because you are the liberal your posts show you to be.
Night woogums.
Positions?? Didnt she just tweet some opinions? You mean her opinions?
You once again act like she is running for something.
You are a leftist -you will eventually get rid of yourself BECAUSE like all leftists there is something missing within you -a moral void; that which you promote that is self destructive will necessarily take you down.
You brought up Romney here,
so what do ya think Romney would be doing now if he was POTUS?
You think he would have made us proud? How are he and palin alike?
You know nothing about me but you imagine you do.
Just like you once again imagine she is running after you imagined it before and woke up and she didnt.
As I posted endlessly in 2011, she is not running.
Your definition of leftist is “He who is shown to be right’ ?
Really, well if the bet is that I am gone from here BEFORE Sarah runs then that's an easy one, we will all be gone and buried before that happens.
You are on to something. There was an insane PDSer a few years back that finally was booted. I wish I could remember the name. Maybe we have the reincarnation?
I have no doubt there are many DUmpsters here masquerading quite effectively as Conservatives. They will spout "Conservative" speak on a small range of issues. That gives them creed. This allows them cover to utterly bash Palin to no end.
I have no doubt that of all Conservatives on the scene today, it is a resurgent Palin the left fears most.
I have absolutely no doubt that many of these relentless Palin bashers are evil leftists masquerading as Conservatives.
The way many will be finally exposed is if during the 2014 elections, Palin campaigns and fires up the base for Tea Party candidates.
I am certain that many of the PDSers will be rabidly foaming at the mouth against Sarah. All we have to ask these evil frauds is this, "Why are you so against Sarah when she is rallying the base for real Conservatives?"
Their hatred and leftism will reveal itself -- The should them be promptly banned.
I actually mentioned nothing about her running. IF you must ask me something RATHER than simply post messages attempting to personally disparage Palin THEN you just have to ask.
I like Palin and feel she is what is needed in DC. I like her because of her principles/positions -mainly those that require a moral backbone.
Plainly Palin is your enemy and as such YOU are an enemy of conservatism and the Republic.
You mean like that silly adolescent girl, Michele Malkin? Come off your high horse and realize that Twitter and Facebook communicate with millions from a non-elitist position.
I like Palin, looks how effective she was being sucker bait for the gullible. She is irresistable to them(like honey and flies, see I called her sweet LOL), and its working again which makes for good fun.
At least one here on this thread is calling her a ‘candidate’ again.
It proves what I post is right, which has not been challenged BTW with all the threats and insults.
You Palinistas are soooo 'plainly' dramatic.
She still wont run, you cant beat a live Dem candidate with an imaginary play acting one.
It sure didnt work last year and she wont be tweeting her way into the WH in 2016 either, maybe just into the hearts of the gullible.
The truth will set you free,
I did and you and a few others took offense to my joking about it. I said nothing about her otherwise.
Are you sure? That was from a clip in 2008 (before the election I think) when she was younger.
How about the Palin 2012 T-shirt? prescient? Or creating the future?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.